Malcolm X and Patrick Henry, while being in different time periods, have many similarities in their use of pathos, and ability to connect to their audience. They were both fighting for freedom, just amongst different groups of people. Malcolm X was fighting for civil rights with his “The Ballot or The Bullet” speech, while Patrick Henry was fighting for liberty from the English during the American Revolution with his “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” speech. These two men had incredible talent which they prove with their writing styles, and rhetoric device usage. They fought very serious problems that people in our time can scarcely comprehend. Both of these men were extremely persuasive, and we’re not afraid to speak their minds. Henry …show more content…
One way Malcolm X did this was with his use of anadopillis, he stated, “Once you change your philosophy, you change your thought pattern. Once you change your thought pattern, you change your attitude. Once you change your attitude, it changes your behavior pattern and then you go on into some action. But as long as you’ve got a sit-down philosophy, you have sit-down thoughts, you’ll be in some kind of sit-down action.” (Malcolm X 2) In saying this he is trying to prove to the people that they need to change from a “sit-down” attitude to one that will cause them to act, and fight for their freedom. A way Henry relays this same message was with his use of Hypophora when he says, “I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motives for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other.” (Henry 56) Henry was not only facing injustice, he was facing danger which is what he is warning his peers of in the previous quote hoping to spur them into
In history, there have been great leaders who have inspired others, lead nations to success, and revolutionized the world as we know it. Famous figures in history are remembered due to their actions, their impact on societies, and most importantly: the struggles they went through to make great change. A wise man once said, “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger,” and leaders like Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.) and Malcolm X represented that through their lives’ work. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.) and Malcolm X: two revolutionary leaders, both alike and very different, were agents of change for their societies and nations all around.
At a tense meeting in a church in Richmond, Virginia, away from the watchful eyes of Britain, Patrick Henry began to deliver a rousing speech to the Second Convention of Delegates. His passion was tangible to the audience as he called the delegates to action. His speech was memorable to everyone in the room and powerful in convincing the delegates to support the war. Little did he know that this speech would continue to be known for its power and persuasion for generations to come. Throughout Patrick Henry's speech, he emphasized the necessity to act against Britain and support the war, but he did so in a way that was unavoidably persuasive. Henry used emotional appeal, metaphors, and rhetorical questions in order to convince the delegates
Context and quote- Henry is describing how powerful and great the army of the colonies could be if they attempted. “The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave” (82).
Malcolm X born on May 19,1925 in Omaha, Nebraska and Martin Luther King born on January 15,1929 in Atlanta Georgia sooner will grow up to be the faces of the African American civil rights movement. Malcolm X was well known for using violence when their is the need to use violence since at the time whites were very aggressive towards blacks, as a result black sometimes need to use violence to defend themselves. Martin Luther king was well known for not using violence at all since he strongly believed that nonviolent protesting was the best way to fight violence. During the civil rights era Martin Luther king wrote A “Letter from a birmingham jail”and Malcolm X Gave his speech “The Ballot or Bullet. With this they spread their message using rhetorical strategy to push for equality for blacks all over the United States.
They had different views but they had a few similarities. One of those being the fact that they both were assassinated because they wanted equal rights. Proving that no matter what happens they will not let go of what's correct. Another similarity is how they both had the same objective, everyone to be treated equally no matter what they look like. They both worked hard and stayed strong even after being punished for speaking their truth. In "Malcom X: By Any Means Necessary" ,a biography about Malcom X, the author says,"And he was a worker. He organized and preached." And in "Encounter with Martin Luther King
Henry to deliver because he was speaking to a group of people who were opposed
Each of these two leaders had different views on how to go about gaining freedom. While King believed a peaceful means would allow the blacks to achieve equality with the white Americans, Malcolm X took a more pessimistic approach. He believed achieving equality was nearly impossible and preached a more separatist doctrine. Each man's beliefs were formed in their youth.
Immediately as the speech begins, Henry’s tone manifests itself and remains unwavering. Henry begins, “It is natural for a man to indulge in the illustration of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth” (1). This sheds insight on his message and portrays him as a well versed individual. He then strengthens his tone when he says
“Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?” (Henry)
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were very significant during the Civil Rights Movement. Both were excellent speakers and shared one goal but had two different ways of resolving it. Martin Luther King Jr. chose to resolve the issues by using non-violence to create equality amongst all races to accomplish the goal. Malcolm X also wanted to decrease discrimination and get of segregation but by using another tactic to successfully accomplish the similar goal. The backgrounds of both men were one of the main driven forces behind the ways they executed their plans to rise above the various mistreatments. Martin Luther King Jr. was a more pronounced orator, a more refined leader, and overall saw the larger picture than Malcolm X.
Dr. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are notable activists during the civil rights movement in America. They were leaders highly credited by the public. They carried similar, and different views on how to take on oppression in America. “Nonviolence: The Only Road to Freedom” (1966) by Martin Luther King and “The Ballot or the Bullet” (1964) by Malcolm X had points were they agreed with one another, points of controversy were the did not see eye to eye, and points of disagreement about violence in the civil rights movement.
“Liberty or death!” This phrase was used by both Patrick Henry and Malcolm X in their speeches. Even though these men gave their speeches almost two centuries apart their goal was the same. They both wanted to convince their audience to fight for freedom. Through the use of rhetorical strategies, Patrick Henry was successful in convincing the colonies to fight for their freedom from Britain and Malcolm X was successful in convincing African Americans to fight for their rights.
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were both known as civil right leaders in the 1960’s. Both men had a different perspective on civil rights and how civil rights should be won. Both men also had strong beliefs on religious and followed on through that path in different ways. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X had several differences and several comparisons and had a big impact for the people of The United States.
Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot?” This effectively puts the audience into a panic of a future under the British, luring them more into Henry’s ideas of war. The audience, already hyped from their boosted sense of independence since the beginning of the speech, is now completely vulnerable to Henry’s words.
Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X were very huge leading figures during the Civil Rights movement. Though they had many differences, they had some similarities. Both men’s fathers were preachers and both men were religious preachers themselves. Dr. King and Malcolm X were around the same age and they were both assassinated. Coincidentally, both men had the same number of children and eventually they had the same ideologies for the Civil Rights Movement. However, Dr. King and Malcolm X were different in ways such as Malcolm X wanted black supremacy and Dr. King wanted equality, Malcolm X saw violence as an option to achieve his goals if peace did not work and Dr. King believed in complete nonviolence, and Malcolm X