Should The Government Use Social Media?

Leading into this, Social media isn't even safe anymore. You now always have to watch what you do on social media, one mistake can lead to a horrible life or years. One the same side, just different and a statistic, the article "Are You Being Watched?", also tells us about tracking out social medias. " A recent study found that 75 percent of the 500 most popular websites use tracking tools... Tracking is legal, but the idea that our online activities are being recorded to upsetting to many Americans.

The book, I Know Who You Are and I Know What You Did, by Lori Andrews, states that social network as in Facebook, Twitter, Myspace, Instagram, Snapchat, and etc. causes conflict in many aspects of life. In today society, social media seems to reveal more a more negative side of the public. Andrews also states that social media is a distraction to every aspect of life including job careers, education, politics, religion, family, and even death. Invading privacy on social media and violating rights of others can cause disturbing commotion and could lead to prosecution. People should use discretion when posting online, and make sure not to post anything purposely offensive or distasteful and graphic content.

The government should be able to monitor accounts if there is suspicion of terrorism. By monitoring suspects, potential terrorist would be stopped and many lives would be saved. After the tragedy in Charlottesville, companies like Facebook and Paypal are cracking down on white

The Internet powers our country. Not only do hundreds of millions of Americans use it daily, our government and states use it to do important national and international business. Our government already utilizes it to monitor the activity of its people. This monitoring has especially risen after events such as the Boston Bombing and the attacks of 9/11. The main reason that the government does this is to keep us safe. If the government puts more slack on this matter, then it will give a chance for terrorists to complete their objective. The normal person does not know how many terrorist attacks may have been stopped in the past years due to this surveillance, and how many lives it may have saved. Therefore, we cannot let our government halt

This essay explores the different relationships between social media platforms and the government to provide insight into the different ways the government uses media masses to further their agendas and how its good business is used for political gain. This essay also discusses the different ideologies and fallacies individuals have of the media’s role in society. This essay wasn’t written to persuade one either way, but rather to bring the important relationship to light, so with better understanding people can make wiser decisions as voters, consumers or investors.

By identifying and discussing the warning signs of terrorism, targets, and hazards, one can assess the various threats and risks of terrorism. U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Hawaii (as cited by Newman and Clarke, 2008) identified seven warning signs of terrorism: surveillance, elicitation, tests of security, acquiring supplies, suspicious people who don’t belong, dry runs, bomber indicators. It does not mean that seeing a stranger asking questions about a particular building and taking pictures that the building is the next target, but it is possible. Terrorism has historically attacked attractive targets that are famous, important, accessible, has a substantial immigrant population, and for domestic terrorism, site of animal laboratories (Newman & Clarke, 2008). Each target corresponds to the hazards of a terrorist incident such as weapons of mass destruction (WMD), chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, explosives, and cyber terrorism.

Mass surveillance can protect the citizen. According to the news report from CNNTech, surveillance can help the government fight against terrorism. In the U.S., at least 52 Americans have been charged with terror-related crimes for allegedly supporting ISIS, and intense surveillance by FBI plays a significant role. Moreover, Ghost Security (a non-government group) said that they have taken down 149 Islamic State propaganda sites, 110,000 social media accounts and over 6000 propaganda videos through surveillance software since it formed. The above statistics can show people that surveillance is important. Nowadays technology has improved a lot so that terrorists can have more strategies to launch attacks like using an app called Telegram for connection. To protect citizen and stop any attack as early as possible, scanning social media users’ data is an efficient

There is much controversy over whether or not the risks of social media outweigh the benefits. While it can be used for numerous types of criminal activity, it can also be used to stop these crimes and other criminals. Just a few examples of occurrences that can negatively affect or even inflict physical harm on people through social media usage include things such as cyberbullying, sexual predation, robbery, etc. These things can permanently affect people’s lives or even, in some cases, kill them. Given these risks, there are also many strategies the police utilize to catch criminals, which would not be possible without social media. So, which is it? Does the amount of predators or cyberbullies online and on social media give ample enough reason to consider social media more help than harm, or are there enough good things that result from social media usage to consider social media a valuable asset? Social media can be used as a tool in law enforcement, but there are too many negative factors, like crime and cyberbullying, that were directly caused by social media to consider it much of an asset.

Infamous terrorist group ISIS and their simplistic, yet effective methods of targeting the populous of numerous countries via social media have become a negative impact worldwide over the past few years. Terrorist attacks in the United States and other countries are becoming more prevalent, including the spread of toxic falsities. Popular sites like: Facebook, Twitter and World Star Hip-hop come to mind as a medium to the masses. This uncensored content sparks disgust with the populous with their governments and the future of those countries. With a surge of technology usage in our daily lives, this leaves the population, primarily young adults, susceptible

Like I previously stated, terrorist are not defined to one race or nationality, meaning any American citizen could have terroristic thoughts. It should be our government’s responsibility to make sure that our citizens are not terroristic. For example, social media pages need to be monitored by governmental services. Technology and social media sites have become a dependence in the US society. Whether it be facebook, twitter, or instagram people are constantly posting, tweeting, or talking about there feelings or interests over these social media sources. These posts could be harmful, inappropriate, and even terroristic and our government would never know. All in all, our government needs to not only watch the foreigners flowing in, but also the citizens sitting right in front of

There are many reasons why the U.S. National government should monitor our internet, but the number one priority is safety. The government needs to monitor if there are an y suspicious people looking at illegal or harmful things. If they do have reasonable accusations of someone, they should interrogate them to see the motives. This could prevent many large shootings and

Over the years, the amount of attacks on the US has increased, unfortunately. These attacks have occurred on planes, malls, churches, schools, etc., which in some cases people may have been able to report that a friend or family member had said something alarming to them. By reporting these people and having them monitored for a specific period of time could be beneficial for the public. As well as, those who were previously arrested for making threats. Monitoring people who previously announced that they were going to harm others could also save lives if the person attempted or announced to social media or a friend of their potential actions. There are cases where people should be monitored and when they should not be. Reports need to be assessed further before these people have the civil rights

There are a lot of different things social media is used for, like catching up with old friends, or the current events going on around us. Sometimes social media is used to plan out protests, terrorist attacks, and things of that nature. We do not have privacy at all, the government is always watching. Even though having our every technological move monitored seems threatening, it definitely has its advantages. They have access to evidence of cyber harassment, prevention of cruel leaked information, and

A key transformation of surveillance after 9/11 involves the emphasis on the future. Rather than focusing on the detection of past acts, law enforcement and security efforts are now geared toward the prevention of future terrorist attacks. This move toward preemptive surveillance has also been combined with a shift toward mass, generalized surveillance of everyday activities.

As technology has advanced, laws have been introduced to protect society, for instance the interception and disclosure of messages as part of the wireless telegraphy act 2006, section 48[6]. So why would you not regulate social media, a new technology phenomena with the potential to cause harm?