The topic of paying college athletes has been talked about for a few years now. A survey in 2013 shows that about 31% of the general public agree that college players should be played(Martinz, Madisen.
“Should College Student-Athletes Be Paid? Both Sides of the Debate.”CollegeXpress), They argue that these players work really hard while trying to maintain their grades, and are bringing in millions for their universities. Some even argue that paying players would However, the cons of paying college players outweigh the pros. The only sports that bring in as much as millions are men’s basketball and football, so paying any other team would be difficult. In fact the profit gained from these sports are used for essentials for each sport, such as food, jerseys,
…show more content…
Getting onto a college team is already very difficult. Only 7% of high school athletes make it into college sports (Martinez, Madisen. “Should College Student-Athletes Be Paid? Both Sides of the
Debate.”CollegeXpress,) It takes a lot of hard work and passion to stay onto a team. Many argue that these players should be rewarded for their hard work, however, that would only cause more problems.
This would affect most players attendance rate, and the attendance rate for college athletes is already lower than average. Not only that, but this would transform what is supposed to be an extracurricular activity into a business. Athletes would transfer colleges, looking for the highest salary. This would completely take the soul out of college sports. Fans of college football and basketball would be disappointed, because most of them watch for the passion and hard work displayed by the athletes, even though they don't get paid. That’s why college athletes are admired, because they work hard in what they love, and adding salaries would take away that charm, because by then they would work for the paycheck, not to improve. Even if all college athletes are paid, it would be very difficult for colleges to pay
Each university associated with the NCAA differ in size and budgeting. Some schools would have no problem paying each student athlete at their school only because of their profits from their ultimate money sports such a football and basketball, while other schools struggle now to even field enough teams to remain an NCAA school. This is why I find it intriguing to see where each school lies on how this situation could affect them. Athletes being paid could also affect high school and pro sports as well which interests me more to research this topic. High school athletics could improve by students pushing harder at the high school level to reach the college level because of pay, while pro sports could have many different affects such as students not leaving school early because of pay at the college level now.
If the NCAA decided to pay college athletes, it would create more problems than solutions. For example, if student-athletes are offered a salary, most likely the cost of school tuition will go up because the money paid to the student-athletes must come from somewhere and the revenue from sporting events and memorabilia will not be enough to cover all student-athlete salaries as well as expenses to run all the college’s sports programs. In addition, not all college sports draw the same fan base and therefore, income is greatly varied between sports programs which in turn will create an unfair balance when determining the salary for each student-athlete. All student-athletes regardless of which sport they are participating would expect equal pay.
With the current system, most of the profits of the NCAA make their way back to the athletes, as explained above, but if athletes were to be paid, interest in college sports would suffer. Currently, fans of college sports, myself included, watch college sports as opposed to professional sports largely because they realize the players are playing for the love of the game as opposed to for profit. If college players were to get paid, this reason would be moot, and college sports would essentially turn into a minor league for the professional leagues. As a result, college sports would lose most of their viewership and earnings
Even if the schools biggest programs are football and basketball pay them. Believe it or not paying the students money would make them more competitive, but in my opinion I think it would make them lazy since they wouldn’t work as hard. If you do start paying the athletes then you can just make them reinvest to the school for books and classes. See players might blow all their money on stuff they really don’t need, which means they can’t buy books and pay for classes because they’re being paid instead of having a scholarships that covers everything. Michael Rosenberg says “I think that only the star athletes should be the ones to get paid not the whole team.”
Many people believe college athletes need to be paid because financially tey are being taken advantage of by the NCAA and school system. These organization are raking in huge profit from merchandise sales, live events of media coverage. Unlike the professional leagues though, the athletes dont get a cut. College teams may not have the same national weight as some professional ones, but they are just avidy followed by thousands of adoring fans. Tons of merchandise jersey, tickets, foods is sold thanks to their performance but despite being the main reason the events are generating revenue the players dont see a dime.
Playing a college sport today is not just fun anymore. College sports are becoming a business and the athletes are the workers. The money some sports programs make from ticket sales, concessions, and media exposure is tremendous. Students playing sports are the ones people pay money to watch, so do the colleges not pay the athletes since they are the ones that bring in the money. They train year around to make themselves and their team better but what do they see for all of this hard work and dedication. Student athletes do not have time to get jobs so the colleges should be willing to pay athletes some small amount to help with some of living expenses.
You have to have really good grades or scholarships. So, in all it is very hard to not only make it on a team but to keep your grades up to stay on the team. You need to be pretty smart. Plus be very skilled at that sport. Some might argue that college athletes should be paid because they have a to do.
If this was to happen universities and all would go down hill just by paying the players and the negatives that comes with paying them. Also the best player in college would get paid the most just for the reason that the person is the best, but someone that is not as good as him should have a equal salary in college. Only in professionals should someone that is the best in the league should get paid the most, but not in college considering that college athletes are amateurs. Athletic scholarships are their compensation and a fair one instead of trying to get paid. College athletes don’t have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on-campus living, and meal plans.
Have you ever noticed how college athletes work their hearts out to play sports but do not get paid for what they do? In my opinion, that is just crazy. There is no way that I would do all of the hard work they put in and do not get any pay for return. They do get their college classes and materials paid for. That is a plus, but when they go out there and play sports for these schools, they are putting their bodies at risk because of all of the contact and rough housing they go through in each game that they play.
The college sports industry makes about $11 billion in yearly income, but not a penny of this goes to the athletes. There are many controversies over paying college athletes; these controversies date back to about the 1900s. More and more people are beginning to voice their opinions on whether to pay college athletes or not; people from former President, Barack Obama, to former collegiate football player, Dr. Phil, have voiced their opinions. College athletes would possibly stay in school longer if they got paid, plus they bring in tons of money to the school or university, and for every game they put their bodies on the line. I believe college athletes should get paid despite them possibly becoming financially irresponsible, already having
Paying college athletes would at least help the athletes leave college with a little bit of money to find them to find them a new
If college athletes began receiving pay, they might begin to care more about the money than the game. This could cause them to not play to their full potential and create a selfish attitude in many players. As stated earlier, many fans like college more than professional sports because they feel like the players actually care about the game because they are trying to make it to the next level to get paid. As a result of paying college athletes, the NCAA could suffer a major loss of fans, and their ratings could drop to rock bottom. Overall, paying college athletes would affect their personalities, which could lead to adverse changes for all colleges in the
College athletes are taken advantage of and deserve to be compensated for their services while playing sports. These students are exploited and used to make money and out of everything that particular school makes, the athlete never given a penny of it. All of the hard works, blood, sweat and tears that they put into that
Now you might be thinking, well if the players get paid it’s gonna ruin college sports, but it would actually make the NCAA more competitive. As listed on ListLand.com “ If the NCAA paid its athletes, the students would not have to add extra stress worrying about where they will get their money from.” These student athletes would no longer have to worry about getting part time jobs and put more effort and energy into their sport to become better competitors.
Student-athletes bring in a lot of revenue for their college and the amount they bring in is too much for the players not to receive compensation. In 2015, Texas A&M brought in “$192.6 million in revenue”(Gaines). Although this money will go back to the athletes indirectly for example, better transportation, better meals, etc. This doesn’t help the players directly and the cost of these upgrades is only a small fraction of what the colleges make. Plus, collegiate athletic programs are concerned with the “now” rather than the “later”. Many collegiate basketball players only use college to fulfill the National Basketball Association’s rule of attending School for a year. “This would possibly increase graduation rates, allow fans to see their favorite players mature through college, and ensure coaches are preparing athletes as much as possible for the next level” (Lemmons). If colleges pay athletes then their chances of staying would increase rather than rush to professionals for the paycheck. If players stay then those fans will buy more tickets which would increase the revenue the Colleges