Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

Have you ever done a job that you didn't get paid for? This is exactly what college athletes go through. They play their sport and bring thing the university millions in revenue but don't receive a dime. Although college athletes receive full scholarships, they should be paid because if it wasn't for them the university wouldn't make any money, so the people generating it should receive a portion.

It is known that college football players practice and weight train for a total of three hours every day to reach that competitive level without even earning a single penny for the effort and time put forth. If the coaches of these athletics are getting paid an average of $3 million per year, then the players should get at least a small amount of pay for their commitment and time put in daily. These players are representing an entire fan base while passing their academic classes each

One of the most popular pastimes in America is watching college sports. Whether it’s football, baseball, or basketball, these student-athletes bring fans, money, and sponsorships to their schools. So why shouldn't these athletes be paid? The answer is that student-athletes should not be paid, because they have the ability to earn scholarships or financial aid, college athletes are paid in other ways than financially, and not all schools have the money to pay them. Ultimately, paying college athletes would ruin the current culture and competitiveness of college sports.

Athletes deserve to get paid because of their time commitment, dedication, and their contribution to the school’s profit. The NCAA prevents college athletes from receiving money. Their rule makes it illegal for these athletes to take money. The NCAA said they would boycott any school that ignored their rule and paid their athletes.

The argument of whether or not college athletes should be paid has been a conflict that has gone on for quite a while and it needs to be settled. Many college professors have said that paying college athletes is a great idea while some others argue that it isn’t. These players attract so many supporters who pay quite an amount to watch these world class athletes play is

Only 2% are drafted into the NFL for instance, while the other 98% are getting a $200,000 education for free. There are eighty scholarship players on each of the 112 Division 1-A teams. This costs a university $16,000,000 to pay for an entire roster over four years (1 “College Athletes Shouldn’t Be Paid”). With all of that money being thrown around, it would be difficult for a college to determine which athlete gets paid how much, and if one sport deserves to get paid more than another.

Who would be responsible for paying the students in this case? And what system will be used; do athletes with better performance get more pay than other members of the team? These things and a lot more only would result to many complexities, and thus, paying college athletes might indeed just deviate the students from what they went to their respective institutions in the first place, that is, to get a degree, not to gain a salary.” (http://www.youniversitytv.com/college-tips/pros-cons-paying-college-athletes/) There has been numerous college athletes that said they want to paid.

Should College Athletes Be Paid? (Final Revision) College sports are a big part of American culture. I along with many other people watch college sports.

Although college athletes dedicate a lot of their time to their craft and school work, they still are not professionals and do not deserve to get paid. At top schools, many athletes receive scholarships. But some people think the players deserve a real paycheck, especially since some of the sports they play are million-dollar businesses. “Top college athletes already get plenty of benefits, such as free tuition and meals. Even though some colleges profit from sports, many don't have enough money to pay their athletes.”

Each year in the United States over 100,000 collegiate student-athletes participate in a variety of different sports and currently they do not receive paychecks for their performances. Many people have asked the question, should college athletes start getting paid? The simple answer to that question is no. The answer is no because the system that is in place now for current athletes is perfect since it gives athletes opportunities, but does not spoil them. There would be many downfalls if the NCAA and universities started to pay their athletes. College athletes would feel as if they are professional athletes and that is exactly what they are not. They are simply playing a sport, whichever one it may be, and that is it. Sports are games

Paying college athletes is a fantastic idea because it helps the players out with their education and debts after college. If college athletes get paid for athletics, the debt rate for college students will go down significantly. For many college athletes paying them for athletics is one more incentive for trying in school. “The culprit is payments to players, an idea that’s astonishingly overdue. Starting next year, schools from the “Power Five” athletic conferences—the Atlantic Coast Conference, the Big Ten, the Big 12, the Pac-12, and the Southeastern Conference—will start offering their players stipends. These allowances will be worth up to 10 percent of the cost of attending those schools, to

One of the main reasons people say that the students shouldn’t be paid is because the scholarship they receive if a more than fair ‘pay.’ What the students bring in revenue to the school exceeds what is covered by scholarship which includes: tuitions and fees, room, board and course based books. An average scholarship usually covers around 2,000 dollars to 5,000 dollars this is not enough money for anyone to live off of, yet this students have to live like this(Welch). People that work for minimum wage make 15,080 dollars a year, and that is hard to live off, these students get over 10,000 dollars left with little help from scholarship. Another reason that people say that athletes shouldn’t be paid is because there is not enough money for everyone or there isn’t a fair way to pay the athletes. This reason is not fair because these students are the reason that the money is available in the first place. Any extra money that the school/program has could be split up for the revenue producing athletes. People also say that there is not enough money that the athletes could be paid but that is entirely false. Many of the top paid officials in each state is a college head coach of mens or womens basketball, or football. New facilities are constantly being put up for the teams as well, some updates may be necessary but not

Student- Athletes should not be paid because they are exactly that, they are student- athletes not professional athletes. The number one priority of the collegiate athlete is to be a full time student not a full time athlete. Secondly, paying players would force schools that are already tight on money to shut down or leave division 1. Finally, paying players would force non-revenue sports such as golf, tennis and most women’s sports to be cut at most universities.

Now and days people are starting to consider paying college athletes but that may not be the best idea. College athletes should not be paid because universities are already paying for education and scholarships which should already be enough, also there is no fair way to pay athletes, and playing in a colligate sport should be a privilege.

College athletes should not be paid. “ They argue that the main purpose of going to college is to get a education, not to make money” (“Should college”...1). College is not a job, it is a place to learn. Also many college athletes receive scholarships to attend that school. “The value of the scholarships athletes receive during four years of college can be well over $250,000” (Weiss et al.1). Therefore, athletes