preview

Sexism: A Theoretical Analysis

Better Essays

The toy aisle is always the place where a little boy and girl would want to go while in a store. The toy aisle has dolls, cars, playhouses, dinosaurs, and anything a kid could even imagine. Did you just place each toy to either suiting a boy or girl more? Sexism shockingly first comes to play among kids and what colors and toys belongs to one another. I’m definitely guilty for analyzing different items for either a boy or girl, but we shouldn’t be doing this. Having the kids grow up with sexism, even if it is little things, is instructing the kids that stereotyping is okay. Personally, this topic is important to me because stereotyping is a big issue throughout the world and we could slowly stop the stereotyping by limiting it from the infant's …show more content…

In Smith’s article, she focuses a lot on ethos to show her side. In the beginning of the article, Smith describes a day in her life when she was visiting her nephew and niece. Her nephew had cow boots on, a Lightning McQueen Shirt, and Disney princess shoes and her niece was in the “stage” of wanting to wear pink and loves princesses. Smith opens the article up with a personal story so she can get her audience’s attention that she has background on the different stages the kids go through and when “boys only play football and girls can only clean.” Smith also used a study from Lise Eliot, who is an author of Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow into Troublesome Gaps. Elliot quoted “looked at differences in the thw way play and caregiving were initiating variable, and how the participants (kids) responded - also verbally - to this initiation, for mother-son, mother-daughter, father-son, and father daughter combinations.” Smith uses Eliot’s quote from the study to explain how the parents are having some influences on the way the children play and respond. Smith uses the background of the study to show how parents are being involved with the children developing the gender-stereotyping in their younger years. In addition, Serbin’s article is ethos based too. Although, she talks more in depth about the psychological aspects of stereotyping. She uses …show more content…

Smith’s tone would be more to the happy side with a little seriousness in it also. Smith’s article is more cheerful because she talks a decent amount about her niece and nephew. She saids, “ my 6-year-old nice, [...] notably moving into the age where ‘everyone in my class,’ ‘birthday parties start to become,’ ‘girls only’ birthday parties, starting cooties.” Thinking about these stages girls go through reminds me of how I developed through every single one of them. Those moments are cute moments though. Smith uses this cheerful background to give her audience a happier perspective on this issue. It gives it more a flow instead of a dry article that has a lot of numbers and citings. For the tone being happy, it’s to show that kids are happy with their lives, and changing the way they look at things are just making them unhappy. Smith also puts a little seriousness into the article to explain that the topic is still a serious topic. She does this by presenting a case study that deals with kids and their parents. On the other hand, Serbian article’s tone is more serious. She take a more serious approach because she wants to show the audience that this topic isn’t just fun and games, the kids are slowly becoming what we are. That’s bad. An example of how serious she is are the words she puts in. They aren’t hard words, they are just tone words such as, “manifestations (8),” “socialisations (8),” and “acquisitions

Get Access