preview

Schools Should Not Have The Power To Limit Online Speech In Schools

Decent Essays

Cyberbullying is defined as, ¨...bullying that takes place using electronic technology¨ by stopbullying.gov. Recently, schools have been taking actions to punish students for what they do or say online. There have been many debates and trails to figure out whether or not schools should have the power to limit and punish students’ speech online. The Supreme Court ruled that if online speech is disruptive, schools can punish students. School districts should not have the power to limit online speech because online speech does not affect most students and teachers, is not very disruptive, and free speech is a precious right. Online speech does not affect most teachers and students. A survey completed by 10-18 year olds in February 2010 from …show more content…

The J.S. v. Blue Mountain School District case was a court case caused by a student cyberbullying her principal. The court concluded that, ¨The facts simply do not support the conclusion that the School District could have reasonably forecasted a substantial disruption of or material interference with the school as a result of J.S.’s profile” (Document D). The Supreme Court ruled that online speech in school barely disrupts classes, evidently making speech online not very disruptive. Also, a teacher at the same school, Randy Nunemacher, said some students were discussing the incident during class, but later revealed, “...the talking in class was not a unique incident [that is, it was not the only time students talked in class] and that he had to tell his students to stop talking about various topics about once a week…” (Document D). When talk of online speech did disrupt class, it was not an irregular disturbance. So, limiting online speech would stop talk of it in class, but students would find other topics to interrupt classes, making the effort of limiting speech online useless. Finally, in the British School Teacher survey, of the 15.1% of teachers cyberbullied, reduced productivity and teacher effectiveness was not an effect of cyberbullying to 84.9% (Document B). Lack of productiveness and teacher effectiveness disrupts class, and the majority of teachers cyberbullied didn’t lack those, meaning classes are hardly …show more content…

In a statement by Laura W. Murphy and Michael W. Macleod-Bell, it is stated, “...that any restriction specifically aimed at [limiting] the speech rights of [people under age 18] in the new electronic forum is a step in the wrong direction and not in keeping with the ideals of our constitutional framework” (Document F). Limiting free speech is violating the right of free speech, so it would be unconstitutional to limit students’ online speech. During the J.S. v. Blue Mountain School District case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that, “Under Tinker, therefore, the School District violated J.S.’s First Amendment free speech rights when it suspended her for creating the profile” (Document D). When one punishes students for online speech, they are violating free speech rights for students outlined by Tinker. This makes it unfair for schools to limit online

Get Access