Bullying doesn’t exist in high school anymore, maybe when we were little but not in this day in time. A principal suspended seven students from her school because they were “ cyberbullying and disrupting the school environment”. The First Amendment to the Constitution says “Congress shall make no law… abridging (limiting) the freedom of speech. Should Schools be Allowed to Limit Students’ Online Speech. No, schools should not limit students online speech cyberbullying does not affect most students and teachers, cyberbullying is very disruptive to schools, freedom of speech is a sacred right.
No, schools should not limit students online speech because cyberbullying does not affect most students and teachers. Girls are more likely than boys to be victim of cyberbullying (25.1% vs. 16.6%) (DocA). Majority of teachers not affected; no need to limit speech ( DocB). Most people in schools are not being cyber bullied,
…show more content…
Court ruled that the student’s free speech rights were violated by the school district. The profile J.S. created didn’t disrupt school learning(DocD). 75% of girls and 83% of boys have never been cyberbullied. The problem isn’t an epidemic (DocA). This person got suspended for writing what they wanted. That makes no sense cause clearly we all have freedom of speech as a free country in the United State.
No, schools should not limit students online speech because freedom of speech is a sacred rights. Students problem w/ cyberbullying have been exaggerated. Restricting students’ speech is an overreaction and violation of the Constitution(DocF). School must show extensive disruption has occurred in order to punish a student (DocD). If they stop what kids post on their online sites, that’s stopping their freedom of speech and that’s disobeying the constitution. Breaking the law and people are allowed to do that, kids, adults, teenagers,
Citizens in America are born with a various amount of rights. One of these rights include the freedom of speech and expression. However, school administrators have the ability to restrict a student’s expression. The Supreme Court Cases ‘Bethel School District v. Fraser’ and ‘Frederick V. Morse’ gave schools the right for the administrators to discipline children when they see fit. Students should be able to express themselves in any way without fearing that their school administrators will discipline
Imagine being bashed on my over a dozen kids online saying rude hurtful comments, would you not want someone to help solve this problem? In my DBQ there is seven different documents with seven different examples. After reading and doing extra research on the documents I think schools should be allowed to limit students’ online speech. I believe that the schools are trying to make this a safer place for students.
The School District claimed the MySpace profile was disrupting school because the students were talking about the profile instead of learning.
By limiting online speech, schools will be able to create an amiable atmosphere and keep students focused on school work. Confining speech will also legally protect students' and teachers civil rights to prevent violation of the Fourth Amendment. Lastly, schools should restrict online speech to avert emotional agony in teachers and students and even prevent causalities such as suicides caused by cyberbullying. With increasing technology, it's crucial to develop school policies limiting online speech to keep students focused on their future without the anxiety and fear of being
“We have freedom of speech, but you got to watch what you say” said the comedian Tracy Morgan. And he was correct. In this modern world today, numerous students abuse the First Amendment. Over the media, students are posting comments, videos, stories, etc. about other students and teachers. These students are cyberbullies. The schools should be allowed to limit students’ online speech because cyber bullying privacy and dignity are important, it hurts feelings, and affects the school.
I believe that schools should limit students online free speech because many students are seriously affected by cyberbullying. And students are not the only victim 15.1% of teachers admit that they have been a victim of cyberbullying. Online bullying has seriously affected both students and teachers too by reducing their self esteem, making them stressed out, and even affecting their home lives. If schools were to limit the
In the ophelia project fact sheet 60 % of targets said that their online experiences as a target of cyber bullying affected them at school and at home by causing them intense anger. Cyber bullies are very mean and should be prosecuted. Cyber bullies cause mental and physical harm as well as the message the bully is relaying can be viewed by a much bigger audience and the message will forever be in cyberspace. Even though some people believe that prosecuting cyber bullies violates the 1st amendment, individuals should be prosecuted for cyber bullying because cyber bullies are making threats which violates the 1st amendment.
On the issue of whether or not schools should be allowed to limit students’ online speech, I firmly believe that they shouldn’t. Doing so directly infringes upon the student’s first amendment rights to the freedom of speech, and for what? Numerous surveys have shown that cyberbullying isn’t a huge problem. Further, one document affirms the conclusion that cyberbullying is just another phase in the long-running evolution of bullying. With this essay, I aim to convince you that schools should not limit their students’ online speech, using my vast knowledge as well as cold hard facts.
Not knowing what to do with the problems. Should we stop stdentśmonline speech?My opinion is to limit studentś online speech so they can have less cyberbullying have no more harmful effect and to keep the civil right law. My opinion on cyberbullying is bad because lot of kids get hurt and harassed. The author states in document C,” K.K., who was a 12th grader at Musselman high school,used her home computer to create a discussion group on MySapce.com that accused a classmate ,S.N.,of being sexually promiscuous.¨(In document C
In a cyberbullying by gender graph by Sameer Hinduja and Justin Patchin, with the cyberbullying research center (Doc A). 41% of boys and girls in a random district in the southern US have ever been cyber bullied in their lifetime which is almost half, and 21% of girls admit that they have bullied someone in their lifetime. Therefore there is a problem here, free speech or not and it needs to be addressed. According to this graph ¼ girls have been cyberbullied and all this information definitely supports the limit because the data represented shows the severity of cyberbullying and why people need to realize that it is a real issue.
Freedom of speech is one of our rights listed in the first amendment, but there should be a limit on what we can and cannot say. Because of the internet, there's a better chance of people getting bullied. People can hide behind a computer screen and say what the want to others without the person knowing who they are. Schools should care about this because this can put students in harm's way. I feel that school should be able to put a limit on students online speech. Three main reasons why there should be a limit on students online speech is boys and girls get bullied everyday over the internet, it causes disturbances in school, and it puts more stress of the schools because they have to deal with it according to law.
Online Bullying or even face to face bullying has been around for a long time. No matter what people try to do it won’t just away, this why i think that schools shouldn’t limit students online speech.The First Amendment states that we have the “freedom of speech” and schools need to respect and protect that right. Also, why should it matter what people say online or face to face? If it's not during school hours it’s not their concern.
The Department of Education also supports limiting students online speech. “In recent years, many state Departments of Education and local school districts have taken steps to reduce bullying in schools. The US Department of
Cyberbullying is defined as, ¨...bullying that takes place using electronic technology¨ by stopbullying.gov. Recently, schools have been taking actions to punish students for what they do or say online. There have been many debates and trails to figure out whether or not schools should have the power to limit and punish students’ speech online. The Supreme Court ruled that if online speech is disruptive, schools can punish students. School districts should not have the power to limit online speech because online speech does not affect most students and teachers, is not very disruptive, and free speech is a precious right.
The purposes of schools include protecting and educating its students. Therefore, naturally, when a student is cyberbullying someone else, the school seeks to intervene. However, many argue that a school’s intervention of its students’ online speech is in violation of their First Amendment rights. Should schools be allowed to limit students’ online speech? That is, should schools be allowed to punish the things its students post online, even if they are done outside of school, and from their personal devices? The answer is clearly yes. From the concept, to the precedence, to the data, to a letter from the US Department of Education, evidences everywhere supports limiting students’