Suppose you are at home late at night when an intruder enters your home and threatens you, but you do not have any firearms in the house. Wouldn’t you be wishing you had some sort of firearm at that time to defend yourself? These types of situations happen everyday in the world. The second amendment states that it is the people's right to bear arms. From a liberal's point of view, guns should be limited to only allow government law enforcement to be able to own personal weapons. In a conservatives point of view, It is a person's right to be able to own and use personal firearms. Gun control has always been a serious issue , and now there is more and more talk about more limitations or even banning guns completely. I for one disagree with these statements. It is easy for …show more content…
There should not be any more new limitations, but our current restrictions need to be more enforced. It is our right to bear arms, and that right should not be taken away from us as free citizens.
“Guns don’t kill people, people kill people”,Is a common statement that is passed around.
Another reason why there should not be new laws and limitations is that these new laws will not apply to criminals. Gun laws are founded to make a nation more safe from murder and violence.
The problem with this that these new implemented laws do not apply to those who have already given up on life and intend to die while killing as many people as they can. Just like laws against theft do not apply to person who intends to steal something. The only thing that a criminal does is not getting caught. Being criminals most of them will not feel remorse when caught, and if given a chance, will most likely do it again. In the city of Chicago gun sales are restricted. This new ordinance went into action in 2010. In 2010 the murder count was 432. In the year 2012 the murder count rose to 500. Chicago has been named the nation's murder capital. Thus, the new ordinance did nothing to reduce Chicago's murder
The strategies implemented began to yield results. Some of the efforts made by the Chicago Police was through the confiscation of guns. A CBS reporter, Dean Reynolds, explained authorities seized about 130 illegal firearms in 2013, a total of 6,500 and therefore murders in the city, according to McCarthy were lower “than in any year since 1965”. But these strategies are far from resolving the problem, because crime incidents are still a common trend in many of Chicago’s South side neighborhoods. Moreover, the Chicago Tribune interviewed police insiders who indicated “high-level officers” would attempt to undercount certain crime offenses as to delay any case that could not be immediately identify, and added: “all this was to hide the murder numbers, that’s all they are doing”. The reporters from the Chicago Magazine conducted interviews to “crime victims criminologists, and police sources of various ranks”, and the importance of the collected information places emphasis on the fissures of the Chicago’s judicial
The number of murders every year committed was about 512; some were either homicides or gang related. About 80 percent of the murders committed were done with an illegal firearm. Evidence conducted by Tracey Meares, from Yale, found the high crime areas, committing murders or possessing illegal firearms lived in indigent and isolated communities. Chicago’s Project Safe Neighborhoods developed small community programs to reach out to felons and offenders. Developing small programs for felons and offenders was a way for Law Enforcement to understand their attitude and outlook on gun violence or possessing a gun. For Law Enforcement they wanted to stress the consequences of possessing an illegal firearm and get an ex-offender to share with felons the importance of staying away from a life of crime. There is no other better way to get through to a felon than an ex-felon sharing his own tragic life experiences.
Despite low homicide numbers in 2014, gun violence in Chicago is once again on the rise. There have been at least 2,123 shootings and 365 homicide victims so far this year, which is already 53
Imagine waking up in the middle of the night to a complete stranger who is in your house, threatening to harm you, and your family, and you cannot do anything about it. Imagine, not being able to go target shooting or hunting, because there are laws passed to prevent you from owning a firearm. The truth is, more and more people in this country are trying to restrict law-abiding people from owning firearms due to the overwhelming rise in gun related crimes. As law abiding citizens, the constitution gives us the right to bear arms. Whether it is for recreation or protection,
“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This is the second amendment, the right to bear arms. Throughout history, it has been, seen as one of the most controversial and significant pieces of text in the United States Constitution with many debating over its meaning, context, and role in modern society. Since its ratification, Americans have been arguing over the amendment's meaning and interpretation. One side interprets the amendment to mean it provides for collective rights, while the opposing view is that it provides individual rights. Although the meaning of the second amendment continues to be a hot-button issue for both sides of the aisle one thing is certain, the role that it plays in the American way of life and the lives that it has affected remains a critical aspect of
“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. This line taken from the 2nd Amendment states to all who live under the governing power of the Bill of Rights as well as the Constitution of the United States of America, that their right to own and to operate a weapon can’t be taken away. It is a privilege to be able to bear arms, as some countries do not have the right to do so. We must understand that the 2nd Amendment is as important as any other amendment and we must protect our right to bear arms.
Background checks for gun buyers were implemented a year and a half ago, more than 4,600 people who were supposed to be prevented from buying guns bought them anyway because their
The right to bear arms is a birth given right to all Americans by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Second Amendment has become controversial recently due to the technological advancement of firearms. Modern firearms are capable of both high rates of fire and greater capacities of ammunition, unlike the single shot muskets that were available at the time of the Second Amendment’s conception. American liberals view these improvements in firearms as dangerous and unnecessary. However, no matter how dangerous firearms may be, the Second Amendment is a necessity for one factor alone: protection from one’s own government and it must be upheld. The Second Amendment provides a physical tool for Americans to defend themselves against a tyrannical government, it allows Americans to form militias against a tyrannical government, and it allows Americans to maintain comparable firearms of the U.S. government in order to prevent the potential loss of American freedoms in the future.
Gun control is an ineffective means of reducing both violent, and firearm related crime. Limiting the ability for law abiding citizens to responsibly own arms only reduces their ability to provide to provide security to themselves and their family. It is not the duty of the federal government to dictate what a citizen chooses to legally defend themselves with.
According to The Second Amendment of the Constitution, the citizens of the United States have the right to own and bear arms, in order to form a well-regulated militia for the security of the states. This right has been discussed for decades as an important issue for the American society, and it has been one of the most controversial issues in the second half of the twentieth century until nowadays. This right germinated with the threat to freedom that the standing army of professional soldiers brought to the Americans. Some argued that the right to bear arms is mainly concerned with self-defense while others argued that this right was implemented to avoid militia disarmament and protect the Free State. This right was
Dr. Jeffrey A. Roth states that “research has shown that a gun kept in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household, or friend, than an intruder. The use of a firearm to resist a violent assault actually increases the victim's risk of injury and death.”
On January 17, 2017, “Surge in the Violence” was released by the Crime lab at the University of Chicago, which had combined a report on the statistics of homicides taken place in the year 2015 and 2016. The number of homicides taken place in the year of 2016 has soared by record high of 67 percent than the previous year. Chicago is one of the busiest and advanced cities in the world and getting such high numbers in the field of crime is a shame and leaves a bad impression on the rest of the world. The violence related to guns has also increased enormously and according to “Chicago Tribune”, 2,958 people have been shot dead by now this year. Though the data shows that the homicides by gun has decreased significantly but the number is still a problem. The gun violence now is a serious problem and the current situation demands strict gun laws.
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The constitution is clearly saying all citizens have the right to be able to own and carry a weapon or firearm. On June 26, 2008, in District of Columbia v. Heller, the United States Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home and within federal enclaves (Cornell 1). This is showing how our founding fathers supported the right to bear arms.
2. It protects families and their property from intruders. You cannot defend your loved ones from an armed intruder if you are unarmed. Guns are used as self-defense and are needed whenever the police fail to provide the services of protection to the general public.
Source: Data points from Gary Kleck, Targeting Guns: Firearms and Their Control, Walter de Gruyter, Inc., New York 1997, and FBI Uniform Crime Reports. (Handgun homicide rate became available in 1966.)