preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of On Dumpster Diving By Lars Eighner

Decent Essays

“On Dumpster Diving” by Lars Eighner is a collective work on the issue of Dumpster Diving, in which Eighner depicts his own adventures as a “Diver.” His development of the central contention, this “way of life” is not as it is portrayed or stigmatized, is progressed through Eighner’s inclusion of the three persuasive appeals: pathos, logos, and ethos. These three devices coupled with other rhetorical devices provide an alluring argument, in which the reader sees the other side through a new lens, and their opinions on this issue is vastly differed, upon completion of the reading.
The first appeal would be pathos, appealing to the audience’s emotions by invoking a plethora of feelings from personal examples. For instance, Eighner characterizes the sadness involved in Dumpster Diving as he depicts of pets that are thrown into dumpsters asserting that, “Although [he] hope[s] to get off the streets so that Lizbeth [his dog] can have a long and comfortable old age [.…W]hen [Lizbeth’s] time comes she too will go into a Dumpster” (116). This shows how Dumpster Diving is not as effortless and free flowing as it is conventionalized, depicting the sorrow which is invoked. Using pets as an example is quite emotional in itself, as pets are considered close to people's hearts, as well as being relatable. Consequently, the case of the author pondering on his own pet’s future, creates a connection between the reader and, thus allows for the pain of the author to be felt by the reader. Another example of pathos is when Eighner introduces himself as a Dumpster Diver and homeless as a result of the negative connotations associated with the phrase “Dumpster Diver” and “homeless,” a sense of pity is directed towards Eighner, as the way of living for him is drastically different from contemporary means. One last example of an emotional appeal would be the narrative on the so called “can scroungers.” Eighner accentuates the fact that these two groups [can scroungers and scavengers] are polar by criticizing that “Can scroungers lay waste to everything in their path and [. …W]ill even go through individual garbage cans, something [Eighner has] never seen a scavenger do” (115). This text renders the dichotomy Eighner is intending to

Get Access