preview

Resolving Two Alternative Dispute Resolution

Better Essays

This paper is to critically discuss two alternative dispute resolution processes, which are the negotiation and mediation. The importance of these two alternative dispute resolution processes is mainly related to various noticeable benefits associated comparing to the traditional litigation process (Ruh, 2015). Specifically, it is to discuss the different strategies for negotiation, which can be applicable to the dispute between Johnny, Sally, and David. Thus, David is to be advised of the most effective and efficient negotiation strategy he should use based on the comparison between different negotiation strategies in terms of respective benefits and drawbacks. In addition, it is also to advise David, Johnny, and Sally regarding the benefits and costs of using a mediator, in the context of the dispute between them.
Negotiation is one of the commonly used alternative dispute resolution processes, where different strategies can be implemented. Brett (2015) states that the determining goals would be a direct factor to determine which strategy to be used. This means that the disputed parties should take into account of the relative importance of substantive outcomes and relational outcomes in order to determine whether the collaborative, accommodating, competitive, or avoidance strategy should be implemented in order to help them achieve their goals (Brett, 2015). Therefore, each of the strategies is not suitable to David’s circumstance really depends on the particular goals

Get Access