Running head: FINAL PROJECT 1
FINAL PROJECT
LENAYE CHAMBERS
BUS.401: PRINCIPLES OF FINANCE
INSTRUCTOR; GRANT MAGNUSON
APRIL 28,2013
FINAL PROJECT 2
FINAL PROJECT
To: Mr. V. Morrison,CEO,Caledonia Products From: The Assistant Financial Analyst Re: Cash Flow Analysis and Capital Rationing
Considering the introduction of a new product,
…show more content…
307)
c. How do sunk costs affect the determination of cash flows? Cash flows that have already took place can be called, sunk cost because cash flows have to be sunk into a project and this cannot be undone. ( Keown, Martin, & Petty, p.305 )
d. What is the project’s initial outlay? Cost of new plant and equipment, shipping and installation costs plus working - capital $ 7,900,000 + $ 100,000 + $ 100,000 = $ 8,100,000
FINAL PROJECT 4
j. Should the project be accepted? Why or why not? This project should be accepted because Caledonia’s net present value is positive and projects that have a negative NVP destroys the value. For example, if the NPV is greater than zero
( NPV>0 ) , then this project should be accepted. ( lard bucket, 2012, sec.13 )
k. In capital budgeting, risk can be measured from three perspectives. What are those three measures of a project’s risk? Capital budgeting risk can be measured from three perspectives. First, the project standing alone risk, is a project’s risk ignoring the fact that much of this risk will be diversified away. Secondly, would be the project’s contribution - to - firm risk, which is the amount of risk that the project contributes to the firm as a whole, thus, considering the fact
The following short case will give you a good idea of how risks surface in business and project planning and what companies do about it. Consider that you are the Risk Manager as you look at this case, as it will be a good exercise for the time when you will be that Risk Manager!
We should accept the project because of the positive NPV and high IRR. We will gain $532 million in wealth which is a big money on the scale like this. The company has a bond rating of AA that makes the risk relatively low. So we should definitely say yes.
Before developing a risk management plan an analysis of risk needs to be performed. This analysis should include all aspects of the project that may be part of
The difference between the present value of an investment?s future cash flows and its initial cost is the:
Harris Seafood should make an investment on the new shrimp plant because the NPV of the Project >0.
Many risks are interrelated. Analyze the following compound risk: Unstable requirements with tight budget will likely cancel the project. Discuss the dependencies that exist between the two risks.
According to CAPM, which measurement of a project’s risk is relevant? What complications does reality introduce into the CAPM view of risk, and what does that mean for our view of the relevant measure of a project’s risk?
According to the NPV rule, Linn should not take up the project, because the NPV of the project is negative for both these two scenarios.
3. Estimate the project’s NPV. Would you recommend that Tucker Hansson proceed with the investment?
When implementing project 1, you face technical and market risk. How would you assess the risks embedded in Project 1?
NPV and IRR methods are useful methods for determining whether to accept a project, both have their advantages and disadvantages.
* negative, the benefits are not large enough to cover all three, and therefore the project should be rejected.
After reviewing the project management student group request, a risk assessment was used to determine all of the projects risks and constraints. One of the main project constraints is the lack of budgeting; the project was allotted no budget to get the ball rolling and no budget to keep the program running. Without a solid number for a budget, the project manager will be
Risk allocation is performed as part of the development of the project structure, which takes into account the distribution of responsibilities and risks during the planning, construction, financing and operating phases (Corner, 2006). The aim is to identify an efficient and effective structure that optimises the costs of the project and ensures that the risk occurrences do not damage the project (Delmon, 2009). According to Grimsey and Lewis (2007) risk allocation has two elements: optimal risk management and value for money. The first implies that the