Rebecca McKenney
Introduction to Comparative Religion
Mr. Hyrcza
10 November 2016
Analysis of Religious Literacy In Stephen Prothero’s Religious Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know – and Doesn’t (New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2008) 1 – 372, Prothero discusses how the American society was once a religiously literate nation, how we became religiously illiterate, and how (if willing) we can become religiously literate again. Prothero states that “this book argues for both the constitutionality and the necessity of teaching about religion in public schools and higher education.” He further explains that the main goal of this piece is to “help citizens participate fully in social, political, and economic life in a nation and world
…show more content…
However, it doesn’t affect Prothero’s credibility. The humor is solely to demonstrate how religiously illiterate the current American society is. To support his claims in this chapter, he wisely uses current surveys that the present generation can relate to. In Chapter 2, “Religion Matters”, Prothero briefly discusses how religion has impacted America even if it seems subsided, and why we tend to neglect it. When it comes to some of the major events of American history, Prothero argues that “none of the classic events in American history…can be understood without some knowledge of the religious motivations” of its major players. (Prothero) Perhaps part of the reason we generally ignore this statement is because of confusion and controversies it presents in government rulings and school teachings. Prothero changes his slightly humorous tone from the first chapter and changes it to a more serious tone. This change isn’t surprising as this is a serious topic. He also continues to use a theme of recent and historical events to help audiences understand his argument of how religion has impacted America’s history. However, Prothero begins a pattern that might lead him into trouble later in his piece. Though the chapter does provide strong pieces of evidence, there are a couple of sections where the transition from section to section either feels forced or is a shock in that a thought came from …show more content…
But his passion is also his downfall. By allowing his piece to be mainly background information, Prothero can make his audience feel as if he is beating in information into their heads while losing sight of the original argument. Stylistically, he also provides too many subsections with rough transitions that can leave the audience to be temporarily confused on where he is going with his argument. Stephen Prothero’s Religious Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know – and Doesn’t, can be a difficult read, as there are several passages which require numerous rereads in order to understand. However, there is an occasional sentence or two that provides an interesting insight. Stephen Prothero’s Religious Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know – and Doesn’t, is not suggested for audiences who are easily offended by different viewpoints of religion. This is also not recommended as a light quick read due the complexity and confusion of the author’s argument.
Works Cited
Prothero, Stephen. Religious Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know - and Doesn't. New York, NY: Harper Collins, 2008.
Of the fairly limited amount of books I have read in my lifetime regarding the origins of the country we live in today from a religious standpoint, the vast majority are rife with one scarcely mentioned and not infrequent pitfall of inaccuracy that glares at me as I flip through their pages: they sugarcoat the difficult parts. Any controversy that may mitigate their argument (such as the gruesome altercations between the early colonists and the Native Americans, Benjamin Franklin’s or Thomas Jefferson’s religious stances, or the Americans’ horribly violent recalcitrance against the nation they then considered home) is deceptively changed or mollified in attempt to please readers, or perhaps even more embarrassingly, omitted out of sheer ignorance on the subject. With The Light and the Glory, preacher Peter Marshall and New York publishing house editor David Manuel defy the stereotypes of American Christian authors and unapologetically disregard potential vitriol from their intended audience in the process. After conducting extensive research on the topics they planned to discuss in their book, Marshall and Manuel devised the following thesis for The Light and the Glory: (a) God has, or at least had, a definitive and demanding plan for America, and (b) our continual deviation from this plan is why modern America is so seemingly headed for
Christianity has a history of being laced with education in the United States. From colonization of the United States with Christian textbooks, to laws written to maintain Christianity in schools, and to now with Supreme Court cases banning Christianity from schools; it has always been a persistent force in America's education. The foundation of the entanglement of religion and education began with the creation of the nation’s first universities. After that, laws were mandated to maintain the religious mix, like the Northwest Ordinance. Significantly, the New England Primer and the McGuffey Readers were the basis of all basic education, as the religious contents influenced multitudes of American generations. Supreme Court cases have proven
From John Winthrop to Martin Luther King Jr., the Bible has shaped much of our government and history. As the best selling book of all time that is often referenced in politics and daily life, both liberals and conservatives argue that it is imperative that students know about the text in order to better understand intellectual conversation. Many literary references to the text are also found in Western culture; therefore, it is
In the documentary A New Eden: God in America, the class was given the opportunity to explore America’s chase to religious freedom and the political challenges it took to achieve such and opportunity where people for the first time were given a chance to seek religious faith that was not imposed upon them, but one that they can personally choose to live for themselves. The problem that would come about during the arrival Catholic immigrants’ as it was thought to believe their arrival would come to oppose the very religious they worked so hard for, while from their perspective they were merely trying to live an average life in America with all it has to offer just like everyone has. The challenge was most expressed in a judicial case of public
To counteract the changes that America is experiencing, as the framers of the constitution foresaw, certain laws such as the first amendment are able to be applied differently in special situations like towards the public school system. Banning religion in public schools is such an important issue, because the school curriculum is unable to accommodate every child’s religious needs or offer the same amount of coverage to each religion represented in America. If parents feel as though the instruction of religion is such a pivotal aspect that should be in their child’s life then perhaps a private school that is tailormade to teach and interpret religious aspects would be better suitable. The principle of religious neutrality forbids schools to give religious objectors a substitute that is, from a secular perspective, superior to what other children get. The material instructed in public schools should enable “the minds of school children to be open to various possibilities [in which allowing] that both creationism and evolution be introduced, without religious applications” (Phy-Olsen 98). Modifying the school curriculum for any such child or group creates not only isolation but also negatively emphasizes the differences between students. Students are unable to achieve their full potential with religion in schools, because they will be lacking the sense of
Religion, whether we realize it or not, is a major element of American society (and also worldwide history). For many, religion is a significant part of their cultural identity. Religion plays a part in all levels of politics and is often an aspect of community events and organizations. Everyday, we all interact with people who have different religious backgrounds and personal beliefs. Children born into religious families are very connected with their religions from birth and this affects the way they will see the world for the rest of their lives. Even those who later explore other faiths or convert to other religious ideas will be affected in
The act of defining religion has been a contentious issue in a wide variety of situations, particularly in the United States. The US is a nation that prides itself on religious inclusivity and freedom. There are consequences to this belief and tenant. Through the social, legal and moral structures of the United States, defining religion has become imperative. In The Impossibility of Religious Freedom, Winifred Sullivan outlines the legal implications of defining religion in the United States. In order for religious freedom to be protected by the American state, religion must be clearly defined. As a result, religious theory must be used to maintain some semblance of religious freedom in the United States. Likewise, Josh Dubler’s Down in
Issues involving public schools and religion have been topics involving intense debate. It is difficult for the government to elucidate the appropriate boundaries of religion in the public schools. It is true that teaching about religion is permitted in the public education systems, but the real question is where the margin should be set between teaching religion and simply teaching about religion. It is almost impossible to teach about the history of the United States without teaching that religious beliefs associated with the history, artwork, and literature. More than the public is lead to believe, The Constitution permits religious activities in and around public school buildings. It is unfortunate that the
Sitting in a classroom filled with several maps of the world, vast spines of colorful books, and watching the clock hit the next hour, there is nothing more that a seven-year-old would rather do than be stuck sitting in a desk for eight hours of the day. Looking back to when I was young and learning about the history and background of the church, I was illiterate. According to Bud Heckman’s definition, “religious literacy is the understanding of the profound role that religions plays in human social, cultural, and political life in both contemporary and historical contexts” (2). Learning about religion seemed
Religion, for thousands of years, has dulled man-kind’s senses to see the lovely light of logic. It has, in point of fact, been the pinnacle of many wars, and caused many a bloodshed; it has seized our minds and, as a master puppeteer, pulled the strings of fate. Yet the question remains, and a grand question it is: in America,which subjects and/or events should the influence of religion cease its reign? The opaque answer, still wet with Heraclitus-like metaphysics, had never been so clear as J.L. Freeman stood before a jury and said thus unto it: “-and if this be the case, then all Seraphs be damned to Hell!” Yet, to be clear, this story does in fact have an origin, hidden, of course, by the primitive man with his puzzling, primitive philosophy!
Many adults become familiar only with their personal religious practices; as a result children lack the exposure and knowledge of other’s people’s faith. There are no guidelines on how to introduce or teach children about other religions, traditions or philosophies. Books can be a valuable tool to share these diverse values and avoid future misconceptions often held towards those whose beliefs are different. Books that are age appropriate for specific children about religion can open the way to more dialogue and respect for others different then our own.
In addition to the areas of ambiguity, there is the problem of religious ignorance (Giess, 2012; Haynes, 2011). There is a marked and dramatic ignorance among Americans about religious traditions including their own (Giess, 2012). Ignorance is no virtue and especially so when the opportunity to harm one’s students through intolerance and ignorance is more prevalent than ever before. The US, the predominance of the Christian religion notwithstanding, is becoming more and more diverse religiously (Gunther & Purinton, 2011). This type of ignorance is a contributor to the escalation of religious intolerance that has manifested itself in increasing numbers of hate crimes (Haynes, 2011).
Religion in public academic institutions and the materials they utilize has been an extremely controversial topic for years. In Nick Anderson’s political cartoon, he is portraying that Texas’ textbook review committee “made some changes” in the curriculum, and incorporated religion into a science textbook. It is no secret or surprise that Texas is a very conservative state -- In 2013, there was an ongoing debate and evaluation by the committee on whether to include creationism in the curriculum or to only include facts proven by science. Subsequently the “creationist” of Texas have waged a war on those who don’t want religion or political stances incorporated in the children’s curriculum. Kathy Miller, President of the Texas Freedom Network
Education plus God equals success. While this statement is true, the job of incorporating the truth about God into everything taught is becoming increasingly more difficult. Schultz charted public education’s view of reality, truth and value throughout the history of the United States to show how an unbiblical worldview has increasingly taken hold of society, the educational system and
Faith is at risk when the action associated with a belief system is motivated not by a conscious, dynamic morality but by a desire for social acceptance. Stephen encounters similar cultural policing when, while still in grade school, his English teacher announces to the entire class that “this fellow has heresy in his essay” (Joyce 69). The dramatic public criticism of a syntactic trifle that does not exactly align with Catholic doctrine serves as a humiliating reinforcement of religiously derived social standards and punishes Stephen for both original thought and individuality. The rigid religion that saturates Stephen’s surroundings conditions him to worship, to believe, and to belong without question or concern.