preview

Relationship Between Jekyll And Hyde

Decent Essays

One might question the extent to which Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are in fact a single character. Until the end of the story, the two seem nothing alike. Stevenson uses this marked contrast to make his point: every human being contains opposite forces within him or her, an alter ego that hides behind one's front. Correspondingly, to understand fully the significance of either Jekyll or Hyde, we must consider the two as looking at one single character. When viewed separately, neither is a very interesting personality. It is their relationship that gives the novel its power. Despite the seeming opposition between Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, their relationship in fact involves a complicated duo. While it is true that Jekyll largely appears as moral …show more content…

Jekyll himself ascribes his odd results to his state of mind when first taking the potion. He says that he was motivated by dark urges such as ambition and pride when he first drank the liquid and that these allowed for the release of Hyde. He seems to say that if he entered the experiment with pure motives, an angelic being would have emerged. However, one must consider the post events in the book before accusing Jekyll of any blame. For, once released, Hyde gradually comes to dominate both personas, until Jekyll takes Hyde’s shape more often than his own. Of course, by the very end of the novel, Jekyll himself no longer exists and only Hyde remains. Hyde seems to possess a force more powerful than Jekyll originally believed. The fact that Hyde, rather than some creature, emerged from Jekyll’s experiments seems more than a chance event, subject to an arbitrary state of mind. Jekyll’s drinking of the potion seems almost to have afforded Hyde the opportunity to assert himself. It is as if Hyde, but no comparable virtuous essence, was lying in …show more content…

You may recall that Hyde is described as resembling a “troglodyte”, or a prehistoric creature; perhaps Hyde is actually the original, authentic nature of man, which has been retained but not destroyed by the gained weight of civilization and conscience. Perhaps man doesn’t have two natures but rather a single, ancient, without morals one that remains just barely restricted by the bonds of civilization. However, the novel suggests that once those bonds are broken, it becomes impossible to get them back again. Even in Victorian England, Stevenson suggests that the dark, instinct side of man remains strong enough to take in anyone who proves foolish enough to unleash

Get Access