preview

Ralph Nader's Case Summary

Decent Essays

The basics of administrative responsibilities involved several significant standards 1) Responsiveness- how rapidly an organization /agency responds to variations. The degree of responsiveness mandated the awareness of focus groups, surveys, and soliciting information about public gatherings 2) Fairness - safeguarded from the denial of life, liberty or property by the government. Flexibility – the capability to adapt to unanticipated circumstances 3) Honesty- lack of deceitfulness. People working together in an occupation have the propensity to trust one another because they shadow similar ethical beliefs. By contrast, people that do not trust others eventually collaborated with a system of formal rules 4) Corruption implicated the abuse of …show more content…

A system of judicial liability allocated financial restitutions for parties whose actions inflicted harm or damage to a third party. Persons who were harmed by administrative actions often pursued reparation from the government for their injuries. Such efforts always required a legislative basis, otherwise they might stumble on the ancient doctrine of sovereign immunity. This principle generally stated that public officials cannot be sued without consent. Furthermore, official immunity was designed to protect public bureaucrats against tortious acts. If a citizen filed a grievance against the city, an ombudsman was appointed to review the case anticipating an investigation. Additionally, Ralph Nader was credited with legitimizing the term whistle blower (a person who discovers any kind of information that is considered illegal). Representative bureaucracy rested on the assumption that society will respond promptly to a group portrayal. Public administrators approached the acceptances of ethics from different perspectives: 1) Utilitarian Ethics was traced back to the writings of Jeremy Bentham in the late

Get Access