preview

RBVSS Review Paper

Decent Essays

Reviews for the RBVSS show some ethical concerns that should be addressed when using the assessment in the school setting. According to Sink and Edwards’ (2005) review, the SVAS psychometric properties were less supported and the standardization sample did not include students in third or fourth grade, thus, the scores should be interpreted with caution. For example, if a student was only assessed with the SVAS without other forms of assessments being administered, the information may not be reliable. In addition, the Spanish-language version of the assessment scale scores should be viewed with extreme caution because only 104 Spanish-speaking Hispanic American students were in the norming sample (Sink & Edwards, 2005). These ethical considerations align with the ASCA (2010) ethical standard A.9.f, which states that school counselors “use caution when utilizing assessment techniques, …show more content…

They suggest that this may lead to an underrepresentation of girls involved in bullying behavior or being victimized (Swearer & Love, 2005). Although the norm group was representative of both male and female students, the American Counseling Association (2014) ethical standard E.8 states, “Counselors recognize the effects of age, color, culture, disability, ethnic group, gender, race, language preference, religion, spirituality, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status on test administration and interpretation, and they place test results in proper perspective….” This identifies the school counselor’s need to be aware of this possible test bias when interpreting the results so that the data can be viewed in context. By identifying ethical concerns of this assessment, school counselors are more readily able to provide ethical assessments and interpretation of the

Get Access