Question and Answer

Max Weber was a German sociologist who first described the concept of bureaucracy, an ideal form of organizational structure. He defines bureaucratic administration as the exercise of control on the

For the Army Profession, esprit de corps is implanted in the Army society of trust and supported by leaders at each level. It is regularly shown in traditions, customs, and courtesies. On each mission, whether it is connected with enemy forces, building up security for an enduring peace, or reshaping a group affected by a disaster; esprit de corps fortifies our dedication to continue on and perform the mission in the right way. Soldiers and Army Civilians are all around prepared, very much willing, and trained to fulfill various missions. Be that as it may, these measures alone are insufficient. To drive forward and win in adverse conditions requires an intangible strength that is at the center of our ethos. The Army's way of life mirrors the conviction of perseverance and will

References Al-Wagdani, A. M. (2010). A Reconstruction of Max Weber's Theory of Bureaucracy. Journal Of King Abdulaziz University: Arts & Humanities, 18(1), 1-46. doi:10.4197 / Art.

Weber states that organizations regulations are formed by few people and this people are the boss, administration employee who tends to have representation powers (Roth and Wittich, 1968). Weber states that the state tends to use bureaucracy on its people in order to establish authority. Bureaucracy is present in various areas in the environment and once bureaucracy is produced then it becomes difficult to

Since Fayol left his general manager office, separated management from business operation and studied it, management has become an independent subject. A number of academics and entrepreneurs are desirous to find what management is and how to be a successful manager. Therefore, through varied approaches, many different views about management has been appearing such as Fayol’s function theory (1949) which based on his owe managing experience and Mintzberg’s 10 roles theory (1973) which came from observing five chief-executive officers. Furthermore, Mintzberg regarded Fayol’s theory as “folklore”. It seems that Fayol’s theory has been made redundant by Mintzberg’s study. The purpose of this paper, however, is to present that

Some have seriously misinterpreted Weber and have claimed that he liked bureaucracy, that he believed that bureaucracy was an "ideal" organization. Others have pronounced Weber "wrong" because bureaucracies do not live up to his list of "ideals". Others have even claimed that Weber "invented" bureaucratic organization. But Weber described bureaucracy as an “ideal type” in order to more accurately describes their growth in power and scope in the modern world. His studies of bureaucracy still form the core of organizational sociology.

​Considered as one of the pioneers of modern management, Fayol formulated a theory, which considers management as one of the key skills of an employee, which is vital across all fields. He was the first to recognize that management is a separate activity, which can be studied on its own. An employee with more managerial skills is more valuable than one with only the technical skills (Byrnes 2014, p.81). According to Fayol, the management has five core functions. These are planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling. Therefore, managerial activities are concerned with formulation of operational plans for the business. His perspective is administrative in nature aimed at making

1. What criteria do you consider to be of more importance? Ideas, proper English grammar or both? Support your answer.

Henri Fayol’s theory was almost a century old and was originally written in French. Further review on several journal articles has led to an overview background of Fayol’s working life which provided the foundation that conceptualized his theory. According to Wren (2001), Fayol was appointed as the Director in a mining company, Decazeville, where he succeeded to turnaround the company to become profitable. Fayol was the first person to classify the functions of a manager’s job. Fayol (1949; as cited in Wren, 2001) identified five key functions in managerial works.as planning, organising, command, coordination and control. Planning consists of any managerial work that involves setting goals and coordinating actions to

In a historical aspect the evolution of management consist of six approaches starting with America’s Industrial Revolution in the late 19th century to the present: Classical, Behavioral, Quantitative, Systems, Contingency and Quality. Before the creation of factories the need for managerial skills was not needed, since products and services were delivered on a small scale and by hand. But with the invention of engines that did not require rivers to make them run, companies started to create factories to produce products in mass quantities requiring a need for more knowledge in the field of management.

In this essay, I have chosen to discuss how Max Weber (1864-1920) and Henri Fayol (1841-1925) compare and contrast in their ideology and contributions to the field of management. Max Weber focused on how to structure an organisation to become successful. He developed six main elements to promote this success, which he considered would develop efficiency. He called it bureaucracy. Bureaucracy has its advantages and disadvantages, it was considered to be “both rational and efficient” (Tiernan, Morley, 2013, p. 17), but for example Weber’s rather strict division of labour also led to workers becoming bored and unmotivated. The six elements that he created were; Division of labour, Hierarchy, Selection, Career orientation, Formalisation and Impersonality.

Based on this right, the bureaucracy designed by Weber has clear division of labor; thoroughly indicated hierarchical relationship and pointed out impersonal relationship (Crozier, 1964). In the course of history, there have been various more perfect organizational systems, therefore, bureaucratic theory was questioned and criticized by many scholar. However, there are still certain organizations that use bureaucracy theory to design the corporate structure despite many critical views.

Academics for years have been pondering the effectiveness of classical approaches to newer conceptualizations within management functions. Are the classical functions put forward by Henri Fayol in 1949 still valid and true today?, or are the theories put forward by other academics such as Mintzberg more valid?, or would the scientific type management concepts be more fitting?. To answer such questions this report examines two Journal journals, “Are the classical management functions useful in describing managerial work?” (Journal 1) and “Some effects of Fayolism” (Journal 2). By analyzing the different arguments put forward, I aim to conclude which theory is more appropriate to management study today.

The classical approach to public administration was focused on finding the best way to perform and manage tasks. This classical approach to Public Administration is often associated with Weber, Wilson, Taylor, and Gulick. Under the classical approach was four areas of focus which was the Bureaucratic, Scientific, Administrative, and Managerial approach. Each area represented the four main theorists that the classical approach was associated with. Max Weber's bureaucratic approach focused on the rational-legal model which viewed bureaucracy from a rational view and argued that bureaucracy is the most efficient and rational way in which one can organize the human activity and that hierarchies are necessary to maintain

Using the film Article 99, by Howard Deutch (CITE) I will be evaluating Weber’s two main claims in his theory about bureaucracy which are 1) bureaucracy is becoming more and more prevalent and 2) bureaucracy is becoming more efficient. In order to evaluate Weber’s claims I will be using examples from the film Article 99, and addressing two questions: 1) to what degree did the VA hospital in the film exhibit the characteristics of Weber’s “ideal type” of a bureaucracy?, and 2) taking the alternative, informal system Sturgess and his colleagues developed as an example of a non-bureaucratic structure, to what degree do I agree with Weber’s claim about bureaucracy’s “technical superiority over any other form of organization”? Weber argued that “the decisive reason for the advance of bureaucratic organization has always been its purely technical superiority over any other form of organization” (Bureaucracy 214). In other words, that organization’s which were run being one-hundred percent bureaucratic were more efficient; efficient meaning an organization that gets the job done quickly, with minimal waste and accomplish the goals of the organization. In the case of the film the goal of the hospital, was illustrated in the entrance of the hospital by the quote that read, “To care for them who have borne the battle” meaning that the mission of the hospital is to help all those veterans who have defended and secured our freedom. I will argue that Weber was incorrect about a