Quantitative Research Paper On Multitasking

Multitasking is an action where one person can ultimately act on two tasks or more at once. In the article, “The Myth of Multitasking”, Nass summarizes that the cause of this issue is simply that the human brain slows the thought process of doing multiple tasks at once instead of one task at a time. This conflict is important because it poses potential risks to us in a mental or physical way. We should teach the younger generation this valuable information which will reduce the amount of problems that deal with multitasking in the future.

As time progresses, we have become increasingly connected with each other but also increasingly distracted. Technology was created to help connected us, but it also distracts us too. Many individuals say that they have the ability to multi-task and can do many things at once. Our experiment allowed us to get a better scope of this claim. Our experiment allowed us to mimic a real-world situation of texting and driving.

I believe multitasking is not a myth because certain individuals are lack of inspiration or lack the desire to properly concur life success prime example, in today society or modern day certain people are going back to school while still working full time and proving for a growing family needs. Many people don’t believe in multitasking because they believe multitasking require is a fast paste environments and there are afraid to make a mistake or give up

Findings regarding multitasking seems to be a lot of talk in Psychology. Theme four says that humans are responsible limited agents and we have agency, meaning the ability to act as agents in the world. This involves the ability to chose, but it is limited. This relates to multitasking. Multitasking is the practice of doing multiple things at the same time (SGWN pg 135). Theme four can relate to multitasking because having agency implies not only we make choices but also that we can change ourselves in some way. Theme four is relating to multitasking and saying that we have the choice to multitask and do multiple things at one time even though there are limitations on how much we are able to change since we exist in a particular time and place.

Multitasking is a common technique used by most people that is thought to be a way of getting tasks done quicker. With the need for speed in today’s society there is more that has to be done in a minimal time. But what people do not realize is that when they cram their work into a limited amount of time, it can backfire altogether. Within this paper will be an explanation of the negative side effects that may come with multitasking such as stress, physical health problems, and frequently making mistakes.

People's minds are not designed to multitask. Even though the human mind is capable of multitasking, while doing so the mind becomes focused on more than one thing at a time. This is a huge factor in dealing with texting and driving. Many people do not realize texting and driving is an act of multitasking. Texting while driving is an act of multitasking that becomes dangerous to everyone on the road. “The average driver takes their eyes off the road for 5 seconds per text message, covering an entire football field’s worth” (Moreno n.p). People do not understand the matter of events that take place in just 5 seconds. Time is fragile in today's

Following are their opinions on multitasking and if they think multitasking is efficient. According to my friend, she believes that multitasking may be beneficial, but that it depends on the circumstances. In example, she stated that “ texting and driving can get you killed.” “Multi-tasking is very productive from personal experience working as a Correctional Officer assigned to the control room and being required to answer alarms and radio staff on the compound to physically check the alarms. It’s beneficial to be able to multi-task so you can get the job done, I had to listen and document everything that was being transmitted over the radio at the same time. “ -

It has been well established that human attention does not accommodate multitasking. The “cocktail party effect” described by Dr. Adam Gazzaley shows that true multitasking is impossible: during a cocktail party, someone can listen to a conversation while shifting their attention to look at another individual having a different conversation but can only notice minor details about the other conversation, such as the sound of their name (Richtel, 62). In addition, the possibility that a person can focus on two different things at once is further diminished by how the two main forms of human attention, bottom-up and top-down, function. Top-down attention is involved in focusing on goals and tasks like writing a paper, making a meal, or driving; on the other hand, bottom-up attention is what causes someone’s attention to focus on something instantly, such as the sounding of a fire alarm or a sound from a cell phone (Richtel, 105-6). This means that a driver’s focus (top-down attention) can be taken completely off the road by a vibration or noise that comes from their cell phone’s capturing their bottom-up attention.

Starting January 26th (Friday) at 1:30 PM I began to log my activity ranging from doing my homework to going to soccer practices and games, to see what time I went to sleep every night. I continued to log this data until February 4th (Thursday) at approximately at 10:45 PM. In the recent studies where we began to log our sleep and social media usage data, it made me realize how much time I spend on homework, social media, extracurriculars, and everyday tasks. This data gave me an overview on how I should prioritize my homework while balancing extracurricular activities. Along with that, I was also able to keep track of the amount of hours I got of sleep every night and how that factored into my everyday tasks.

What you view as harmless multitasking affects your efficiency because our brains have cognitive limits. According to “How to Do One Thing at a Time” published by Women’s Health Magazine, Clifford Nass, Ph.D., a professor at Stanford University performed an experiment on a group of students. A group of students was asked to spend 30 minutes to compile a playlist, chat, and write a short essay. Another group of students spent 10 minutes focusing on each task individually. After they completed their tasks, they were given a memory test. Professor Nass concluded that single-taskers did significantly better on the memory test than multi-taskers.

Their whole research is based on idea of multitasking, or in the other words, the handling of more than one task at the same time by a single person. Their sources state that engaged in multitasking, subject is not able to fully intake all the information that is being presented at the certain moment. Moreover, their research hypothesis is that subjects who activley use cell phone engaged in face to face conversation with a person who is not using their cell phone will be less likely to retain as much as information as someone who is not using cell phone. I really liked the way they organized everything and how they set up their experiment. Two groups, experimental and control were presented to the same set of questions about the states and president candidates. Expermiental group was asked to search up the results on the phone while being asked some of the questions. Control group was simply asked the questions without their usage of the phone. Really smart way of presenting how multitasking has an effect on the working memory! Their results support their hypothesis because control group was able to retain information better than experimental group.

A large amount of people multitask every day. Some people say it is good, others say it is bad. Research shows that only about five percent of us multitask effectively (Weimer). Which means that the other 95 percent don’t. However, researchers at Ohio State University found that students that watch TV and read a book at the same time are more emotionally satisfied than those who don’t (Taylor). Eating and watching TV seems to be a good idea, but studies prove that we tend to eat more when we do other things. Hill says, “Some students can

Intro of subject/issue: Through people may think may think “well i can do my homework, check my phone, and listen to some dance music all at the same time”, but the ease of turning on a screen, pressing play on the screen while looking at notifications, also while reading and writing doesn 't compare to driving a car while checking the phone. According to neuroscientist Etienne Koechlin extensive practice of a single task to where there is no room for improvement makes multitasking a lot easier for large task such as putting on makeup while driving (moms).

Multi-tasking can have positive effects. What is multitasking. Multitasking is performing multiple tasks- doing several things- at the same time . A example of multitasking could be when a person is watching tv, doing homework, eating, and doing research on something all at the same time. Some positive effects of multitasking may include: preparing one for future jobs that could require multitasking, learning to use multiple senses simultaneously, improved productivity/accomplishing more in less time, leaving more time for social or leisure activities and thereby reducing stress.

Multitasking is becoming very significant on the workplace to complete the task in less time. In fact, some people believe that multitasking saves time and can be done at all together. On the other hand, some people think that it is a distracting activity which leads to a lack of concentration. According to David Silverman, “In Defense of Multitasking”, multitasking is “crucial to survival in today’s workplace” (522). However, I do not agree because multitasking reduces productivity, increases stress levels and it is, especially, problematic for students.