To what degree does lobbying harm the United States?
Drew Wolf
Capstone/Santer
April 20, 2017
Word Count:
Introduction
Lobbying is an issue that has recently found itself at the forefront of the American politics. Many feel that lobbying is essentially a legalized form of bribery and has lead to the government catering to the needs of special interests instead of the interests of America at large. According to a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center, 74% of Americans believe that elected officials place their own interests ahead of the country's. So it seems many Americans wonder who their representatives are actually representing. Lee Drutman, a political scientist, compares the current situation of
…show more content…
Drutman states that tax codes are one of the most lobbied things in the United States. A tax code that is as simple as possible is generally considered to desirable for a business as a whole. However, a tax code that has caveats here and there that favor certain companies, is more desirable to the respective company. Due to this, companies lobby heavily to mold tax codes in a way that favors them. According to Congressman Bill Frenzel, the lobbying done by corporations has resulted in a tax code that is “a hopelessly complex mess, antithetical to growth, and is crammed with conflicting incentives."
Tax codes are not the only thing corporations lobby. Corporations also lobby heavily to have regulations placed on their industries. They lobby to have regulations that greatly increase the cost for companies looking to enter the industry. This removes the threat of competition for the corporation and ensures that they remain. This essentially creates monopolies, one of the least desirable things an industry can have. Since there is no competition, there is less incentive for the corporation to innovate, lower costs for consumers or provide an all round better product to their customers. Lobbying does not only harm the U.S in an economic
…show more content…
According to a survey conducted by FORTUNE on lobbyists, lawmakers and staff of the lawmakers found the that aforementioned groups consistently ranked the NRA as the second most powerful interest group in the United States. Furthermore, the NRA (National Rifle Association) spends around three million dollars annually according to Opensecrets. Even if you disagree with the beliefs of this interest group, they do show how an interest group can exercise influence without spending large amounts on lobbying.
How exactly is the NRA able to exercise such a great amount of power over what legislation is passed when their lobbying budget is so small? The answer lies in the fact that their constituents are very politically active.
This makes sense when you put yourself in a congressperson's shoes.
If you had to decide how to vote on a piece of legislation what would influence your vote more; seeing a poll that says 80% of Americans support the legislation or receiving dozens of angry phone calls telling you that voting in favor of the legislation would violate one of the most important rights in the constitution and send the entire country hurtling towards
The National Rifle Association also continues to make an impact with politics and send founding to the national parties and committees. Donations that are made to national committees rapidly increase campaign spending. The NRA is very politically active and is a large organization with over five million members. Followers of the NRA are able to make their own political donations as long as they are in regulation with campaign finance limits. There are so many members involved with the NRA; thus, political power builds immensely.
All these wealthy groups and people would benefit from passing of a certain law. For example, big banks and central banks have an interest group, who uses congressmen to try to influence politicians so that they won’t make strict policy regarding banks systems and how they operate. Those rules may be affect banks or big business in generating fewer profits. Majority believe that it is a bad thing that interest groups and lobbyists are involved in legislating because their voices and ideas do not come directly from ordinary citizens. Their interest to grow their business and wealth may not benefit the general ordinary citizens of United States. The big business and wealthy groups may try to influence a bill to be passed for their interest and not for the interest of the general public. Nevertheless, Congressmen may listen to the big central banks because they have money to play around with. This includes donating to Congress campaigns to be
The TSRA uses mainly on it’s influence over it members in casting votes for candidates that support their values. Much of the money donated goes to programs that can be established to train, teach, and mentor those who which to utilize a firearm. A small sum of this money however is contributed to candidates campaigns. A few examples are in 2004 the PAC donated $1,000 to two separate republican candidates: Pete Sessions ® and Arlene Wohlgemuth (R). Sessions and Wohlgemuth were both running for the Texas House of Representatives at that time. Another example is in 2008 the PAC contributed $1,750 to three candidates: $500 to Michael Burgess, $250 to Jeb Hensarling (Both running for a seat in the Texas House of Rep.), and $1,000 to John Cornyn (Running for a seat in the Texas Senate)(Credit: Center for Responsive Politics). This reflects the the TSRA’s PAC often invests small amounts of money in republican candidates running for the Senate or House of Rep. in the state of
Dating back many decades, it appears that lobbying and politics have always gone hand and hand on any political stage. Lobbying has always had a strong presence in the legislation system. Lobbying is the process of offering campaign contributions, bribes, or information to policymakers for the purpose of achieving favorable policy outcomes. Conventional wisdom suggests that lobbying is the preferred mean for exerting political influence in rich countries and corruption in poor countries. The legislation is meant to benefit society and ensure that citizens are having their voices heard, instead of hindering them in favour of the multi-national corporations. Lobbying has a negative influence on legislations in both developed and developing
The controversy surrounding political lobbying does not question the act of influencing public officials, but rather the ethics relating to how these public officials are influenced. It is important to distinguish the fine line between bribery and lobbying. It is illegal to bribe a public official in the United States. This would mean that an individual could not provide compensation to a public official for them to behave, or vote, in a specific manner. Lobbyists may donate money to a specific candidate’s political campaign, but they may only do so when there is no expectation that the public official will behave in a favorable way toward the lobbyist or their clients (Mackinder). Lobbyists may bring public officials, their immediate families, and staff on trips or out to dinner. While it is illegal for a lobbyist representing a corporate client from directly bringing, it is not illegal for foreign governments to sponsor for these said trips (Goldmacher). What has begun to happen is lobbyists representing corporate clients may bring public officials on these trips, if the trip is sponsored by a foreign government. The Senate Office of Public Records reported that $3.23 billion was spent on lobbying in 2013, with 12,300 registered lobbyists. Professor James Thurber, who teaches at American University, has studied congressional lobbying for over 30 years, and does not believe these figures are accurate. He believes
In a pluralist democracy like in the United States, interest groups have played a major role throughout the history through highly organized factions and are aimed at different levels of government. Lobbying is one of the tactics of the interest groups to aid their agenda through implementing new laws and regulations. "If you want to have your face in the light, you should have your back in the dark". Similarly, the influences of the interests groups and lobbyists have good and bad effects on the people and the society.
Interest groups are collective members of a people having same thoughts and work to influence the decision, plans and day to day activities of the legislators. As stated in the law of Texas, it is required for the lobbyists to have the proof of spending to the legislation and all other officials. However, only 5 percent of lobby’s have reported their spending to influence the legislators for passing their law and decisions. Lobbyists don’t have to report the legislators name as long as the bill cross $114 per day. Expenditure incurred by the lobbyists on food and beverages has been in huge amount and almost 95% of such expenses has
Both sides of the topic have gripping reasons why they feel the way they do. The supporters believe that lobbying is acceptable and contributes to a healthy democracy. In this light, lobbyists are simply seeking power within governmental and public affairs. In the United States our political system is based on power, authority, and legitimacy. One of our nation’s values is the fact that people can and should try to influence our political system; individuals have the power to bring attention to important issues, matters of public concern, and current problems. Supports argue that lobbying cannot contribute to the demise of American democracy. All these factors contribute to what is our political system and lobbyists are arguably doing their best to advocate for the people, even if huge sums of money are involved.
I feel that money is an important factor to lobbyist whose connection with people at the top is crucial. Representative Lloyd Doggett agrees that in most cases, “All the lobbying is focused on a handful of people at the top”(Wayne, NYT, 10/01/01). It seems to me that major corporations have an easier time
If you were deserted on Mars, by the rest of your crew, what would you do? Where would you start to pick up the pieces left with you, considering you are on Mars? Would you give in and let go of your life, or would you be determined to fight and make your only chance at survival possible. The novel The Martian by Andy Weir tells the story of a man left for dead on a foreign planet. Well, this happened to Mark Watney and he considered his options presented to him and decided that he was going give it everything he had left in him to make effort to survive while on Mars, but eventually to make contact with Earth and make it home.
Interest groups and advocacy groups have an undeniably strong influence in Washington, and while the results of lobbying efforts are not often touted, they sway policy in areas like energy, housing, public finance, education, gun control and many more. These interest groups may represent parochial interests, but there is surely an area of policy that matches most splintered-off factions. While they’ve been portrayed as shadowy forces in lawmaking, “Interest Group Influence on US Policy Change: An Assessment Based on Policy History” by Matt Grossmann attempts to quantify and
In the beginning of the story, a man named Fortunato constantly insults a good friend named Montresor. One day, Montresor can’t take enough criticism and decides to take action against Fortunato. In the story, the Cask of Amontillado, three themes occur over time, which are revenge, alcohol, and foolishness. One of the first themes of the story was revenge. The first few lines describe how Montresor wanted revenge over Fortunato for what he has done.
Sometimes a lobbyist can only get a couple minutes of their time, so the lobbyist must be prepared to make what they are going to say to persuade them fast. Lobbyist usually provide arguments, confirmation, and research to maintain their group situations. Many government officials don’t have time to research the issues themselves, so they depend on the information that interest groups and lobbyists provide to keep them informed and up to speed. Even though persuasion is a very important part of lobbying, interest groups also provide some material incentives to government officials. Also, what wealthy interest groups usually do is contribute to campaigns, and run advertisements to reach their goal. Another useful method interest groups use to accomplish what they want is boycotting, or declining to purchase an organizations
We elect politicians on the basis on the issues by which they stand, and these issues are either held up or weakened by the numerous interest groups that exist today. Interest groups target both major and minor issues, using all of their resources to sponsor or overpower the groups’ concern. Interest groups are composed of a limited range of the body of voters who have a great stake in the issues their group support. They make evident the issues their group supports. Their resources are used in an attempt to make their issue public policy. Interest groups are persistent; they do not give up until they succeed. They lobby congress, take legal action,
As several authors this week contend, lobbying tends to carry a negative connotation in everyday language. The key issues that the authors seek to address this week, are when lobbying occurs, the nature of lobbying, and how it works. Overall, there is some agreement on the fact that lobbying is prevalent, the disagreements arise over what purpose lobbying serves, and what the strategies underlying lobbying are.