Pre-Revolutionary Russia was infamous for the growing discontent amongst the people from systematic mistreatment and neglect. Sources 6, 7 and 8 despite differing in content and provenance all provide insight into the social situation in pre-revolutionary Russia and reasons for the peoples’ discontent. According to its context statement by M, Anderson, Source 6, Living conditions in pre-revolutionary Russia, is a photograph from the early 20th century that illustrates the standard living conditions of peasants in Russia at the time. This visual source provides primary insight into the standards of poverty that were frequent amongst the working classes and serfs during the circa 1900s. The photograph depicts an emaciated and impoverished family …show more content…
This economic disparity deepened the divide between the upper and lower classes, exacerbating the grievances of the people. Source 7 is an excerpt extracted from The History Learning Site and was written by C. N. Trueman. Trueman uses this passage to explain the process of Russification whereby peoples of non-Russian cultures were absorbed into the empire and “forced to adopt Russian Customs, Culture, and religion to the detriment of their own.” He uses this process of Russification as justification for the resentment and social dissent amongst the populous, asserting that “as there were no constitutional means by which they could voice their anger, the Poles, Lithuanians, Finns, Ukrainians etc turned to revolutionary action.” Given that 60% of the Russian idea that Russification played a significant role in fostering social unrest within the Russian empire. Source 8 is a passage from a speech by the leader of the revolutionary Bolshevik Party, Vladimir Lenin. This source, as it is a direct quote from a key figure in the Russian Revolution, provides important primary insight into the factors causing
Immediately after World War II, the world was thrown into a massive ideological conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union, which culminated into the Cold War. The Cold War ignited overwhelming, panic-inducing fears across the United States, and Dwight D. Eisenhower, elected in 1952 and remained president until 1960, was faced with the challenge of quelling the fears of the American people. Americans during the Cold War, particularly during the presidency of Eisenhower, had constant fears of Soviet expansion, the pertinent anticommunist crusade at home, the spread of communism, and the neverending uneasiness of total nuclear annihilation, all fears which the Eisenhower administration would inadequately allay.
Years of tension between the U.S and The U.S.S.R led to billions of dollars on weaponry, A race to Space and the mistreatment of millions. This is the focus point of the USSR coming to be known has a world power. Now Questioned yourself what should the educational system should focus on Russia’s rise to supremacy? The Soviet Union was born out of the Russian Revolution that followed World War I. During the next 70 years, it grew to become a world Superpower leaving a number of marks on 20th century world history. Looking into several of those marks and ask which ones deserve special attention in a school textbook. The textbooks and educational systems should focus on its rise to military strengths, , it’s social and economic conditions,and the oppression of the Russian people.
During the early 20th century in Russia, the country was a tsarist country which was ruled by Tsar Nicholas II. Russia was a vast country who had one of the largest agriculture producer. During that time Russia rely on agricultural as their national income. This peasant country have a population of approximately 127 million people. The rich were very rich and have a comfortable life while the poor was treated unfairly, many people had died because they don’t have enough food.
Russia reborn The Russian Revolution can be argued, that it was started for many different reasons but i believe it was caused by three main reasons that happened in Russia during this period of time. The three reasons are, the involvement of Russia in WWI, the autocratic government, and the poverty/non-industrial economy and agriculture. In Document 1 it says “ Before the twentieth-century, 80%-95% of the population were poor peasants”. Since economic struggles were country wide and the people were suffering, a change or a revolution was close to come.
Many historians argue The Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861, to be a key turning point within Russian history. It drastically altered Russia’s economic, political and social stipulation. One could propose the argument that this event lead to the fall of communism in 1990, further more suggesting the extent to which this event affected Russia. Hence this is ‘perhaps the most defining moment in Russian history, with its impact being seen many years after the event itself’. Although historians identify short term effects of this event, the significance to which this event
During the Cold War the soviets accomplished many great things. According to Karl Marx societies experienced certain stages ; capitalism, socialism, and finally communism. Capitalism was about private ownership and greed. Both socialism and communism were about equally distribution of wealth and ownership. There wouldn't be any labels such as Rich and/or poor. In 69 years as a country the Soviet Union accomplished many great and cruel things, military strength, the great Terror and cultural achievements. These should all be included in their textbooks to remember this time in history.
After the Second World War, the imperialist countries were devastated with Germany being divided among the allied victors. Consequently, the United States and Russia were the most powerful countries in the world. From 1945 to 1991, democracy was represented by the United States and communism was represented by the Soviet Union. Russia aimed to conquer as many countries as possible to insure communist domination of the world. This rivalry was called the Cold War, where both countries competed for their type of government, but did not necessarily go to war with weapons. Both countries, threatened each other with powerful nuclear weapons, causing mass hysteria. During the Cold War, Americans feared communism, a nuclear war, and Soviet dominance
The social and economic grievances in Russia throughout the 1900s were, to a moderate degree, the result of Tsar Nicolas II's failure to address the difficulties confronting society and the economy; nonetheless, the concerns had long-term causes that began before his reign. This can be seen through the unfair worker conditions, overcrowding housing which were created before Tsar Nicholas’s time which wasn’t a result of him, and the continued discrimination against the Jewish race and antisemitic views as well the economic issues of the failure of World War 1 which Tsar Nicholas II caused. Tsar Nicholas presided over the Russian Empire, which was overrun by various social issues, this along with his autocratic rule which to some extent caused
(doc.1) so the peasants were pretty much like slaves. There were more poor people who were farmers and they didn't have food .this lead people aka poor people go into a rant and wanted to overthrow tsar's government. The middle term cause was that tsar had too much power in his hands. In ‘' the 19th century a significant minority of the Russian population began to call for a voice in the government'' (doc.1) so people thought the ones
How the Russian Revolution Changed the Lives of People in Different Social Groups in Russian Society
There were many people and organizations influential with radical revolutionaries that were present during the late 18 hundreds in Russia. One of these radical revolutionaries was Elizaveta Kovalskaia. She was influenced early one in her life, “I was barely six when I became aware that there were landowners and peasant serfs in the world; that landowners could sell people.”# She would grow as a revolutionary seeing the differences between methods of what did and didn’t work. She was very critical of the methods that she believed were ineffective. The other side of this coin is the effective methods that she utilized. The way Kovalskaia presents her experiences argues that her methods as a radical revolutionary were the right ones.
n March 2nd 1917, the rule of a 300-year-old dynasty was laid to rest as Tsar Nicholas II signed his warrant for abdication, officially sanctioning the end of the Romanov Dynasty. The immediate cause permitting this action was the success of the February Revolution however; this event evolved because of several internal and external factors, both long and short term in nature. Predominant among all we recognise the perpetuation of an outdated system of rule, the repercussions of rapid industrialisation, emerging doctrines of liberalism, political inflexibility and the vices imposed by the First World War. These factors progressively embellished societal discontent among the Russian people and inexorably stimulated the insurrection of the February Revolution.
A well-respected man called Lenin went to a meeting in London and had strict ideas on a complete change of who controlled
Russia's overthrows and shortage caused revolutionary upheaval and massive inflation, which led to deprived infrastructure. During World War I, Russian society naturally caused great dissatisfaction among the serfs. As the revolution wore on, numerous reform and Tsar Nicholas II, a ruler, tried to change Russia's social structure and government. Among the masses, there was discontentment with Russia's social system and living conditions. Laborers worked and lived in horrendous conditions, which played a crucial role in aggravating the condition of workers and peasants. As a result, peasants starved and Russia’s armies were overpowered on the battlefield because much of its terrain was occupied by enemies. Hence, Imperial Russia was a
The peasantry made up a huge proportion of the population and the stability of the Russia depended on their compliance. There had been growing peasant resentments over noble ownership and this resulted in the peasants trying to overthrow the landowners. The commune were poorly organised and