Tsar Nicholas II Dbq

Tsar Nicholas II, to a relatively large extent, however not entirely, failed to effectively bring political and economic stability to Russia by 1914, and World War 1, instead managed to provide a fragile veneer of stability over the empire. There were a number of reasons for this. Firstly, the revolutionary events of 1905 we’re never adequately recovered from, and while Nicholas II manages to appease some groups, he fails to appease many of those against the Tsarist regime. Further, while Stolypin’s economic reforms gained relative ground in terms of agricultural reform, they ultimately failed to invigorate Russia’s industry and provide the economic

In Tsar Nicholas II’s early rule, his main objective was to uphold the European status quo. In the 1890s they began to expand their industries and the following year the Trans-Siberian railways were under construction. The strength of the Romanov rule was the church, army, political parties, and the secret police. Although they supported Tsar Nicholas II, soldiers joined riots against him and church’s supported him, but did not approve of his ways. The weakness of Tsar Nicholas II outweighs his strengths, being his incompetence of problems, economic and social, in Russia at the time.

While fighting during World War I, Russia’s military sustained heavy loses and food supplies across the country

The effects of World War One on Russia were profound. Russia’s once remarkable financial stability was demolished by the War, the disruption of their transport system, the shortage in food supplies and the rapidly rising price in supplies created a foundation for a revolution, and also, a considerable loss in confidence of the Tsar. On the 23rd February, International Women’s Day, the women of Petrograd led a riot through the workers districts. They were fed up with waiting for bread, often waiting outside bakeries overnight to be first in line. This chaotic riot turned into a revolution when chief of the military district, General Khabalov when he ordered his troops to fire on the unarmed crowds “The chief of the military district, General Khabalov, could not cope with the situation.” The turning point of this situation was after the General issued his orders, his army refused

The First World War was seen as a devastating impact on Tsardom and is seen as the main reason for the fall of Tsar Nicholas II in 1917. “The effect of the war was

Russia's overthrows and shortage caused revolutionary upheaval and massive inflation, which led to deprived infrastructure. During World War I, Russian society naturally caused great dissatisfaction among the serfs. As the revolution wore on, numerous reform and Tsar Nicholas II, a ruler, tried to change Russia's social structure and government. Among the masses, there was discontentment with Russia's social system and living conditions. Laborers worked and lived in horrendous conditions, which played a crucial role in aggravating the condition of workers and peasants. As a result, peasants starved and Russia’s armies were overpowered on the battlefield because much of its terrain was occupied by enemies. Hence, Imperial Russia was a

For hundreds of years, Russia was ruled by czars, who had absolute power over everyone. However in early 1900’s, Russians were defeated in both the Russo-Japanese War and WWI. Czar Nicholas was a inadequate ruler and was tied to these constant failures because of his poor leadership skills (O’Brien). This started a revolt from revolutionary groups, which pushed for rule by the working class, rather than rule by elites. The most prominent group that lead these revolts were the Bolsheviks and their leader, Vladimir Lenin.

Despite the evidence that shows that the leadership during WWI was the main cause of the Revolution, some historians argue that the peasants freedom from serfdom was the primary cause of the Russian Revolution.Moreover, they claim that even though serfs were freed from serfdom but they were not given a sufficient amount of rights or opportunity to improve the circumstances that they were faced with during serfdom thus leading in their revolt against the government.Although not all opportunities were given to the ex-serfs immediately they were given a substantial amount of leeway and opportunity”. “the introduction of representative institutions and the conferral of civil rights on the entire population in 1905),.... Vertical social mobility

Russia in the late 19th century was the perfect breeding ground for new political opinions, including extremist options such as Marxism, or Communism. With a recent embarrassing defeat during the Crimean wars, in which Russia lost the three year campaign against the Ottoman empire even with the world's largest standing army, millions of citizens were pushing for reform, their cries even reached the ears of the Czar. It was clear that although their population was greater than both Britain and France’s combined, the country was lacking in all modern technologies. With serfdom soon abolished by Alexander 2nd, and the country beginning to undergo intense and focused urbanization under the ruling of his son, Alexander 3rd, Russia was changing.

They suffered low wages, poor housing, and many work related accidents. They government attempted to regulate factories by passing acts to restrict the amount of hours one could work, but their efforts were insignificant and led to many strikes and constant conflict between the workers and the police. Before the Crimean War, Russia had very little industrialization compared to Western European powers. This was partly due to a greedy upper class and serfdom, which is a system in which peasants provide feudal agricultural labor in exchange for the use of part of their master’s land in order to cultivate their own food. However, after the Crimean War, the tsar Alexander II enacted various reforms, one of which included the end of serfdom, this paved the way for Russia to begin industrializing. Between 1890-1910, Russia’s economy increased, due in part to the expansion of the Trans-Siberian Railway and a higher exportation of natural resources. A consequence of Russia’s industrialization was an influx of population in cities. Unlike other industrialized nations, Russia’s cities didn’t expand to accommodate their population growth, so workers in the cities were forced to endure poor and unsanitary living conditions as well as work days with little pay. Due to Russia’s long history of serfdom, there was little technological advancements and people skilled in

The significance of the World War I in context of the Russian Revolution is that it provided the “proletariat” to assert its influence over a weakened state. And as stated by Marx himself the breeding ground of a true socialist revolution would be a land plagued with inequalities, hunger and strife. The World War I presented a situation like that. (Classzone Inc.

Russian Revolution From 1855 to late 1920’s Russia underwent many economic, political, and social changes that impacted the country as a whole immensely. Undergoing changes within Russia’s government; do to, shift in rule and leadership powers, taking on wars Russia is incapable of winning, and going through the era of change during the Russian Revolution, all showed Russia’s strong and weak points as an empire. The social causes and effects of the Russian Revolution all go back to the assassination of Alexander II.

World War I was a major event that could that caused the training reaction of things primitive to the Russian revolution to happen due to the effects that occurred because of it. The role that Russia played caused various issues as the fee of Germany was still in stalemate and cause Russia to spend more of its supplies of weapons. Industrialization was prevalent in terms of the increased shortage of supplies catering to the militants in contributed to the alienation of their territorial states,which included the feet to Germany,further digressing their influence of national affairs. Infliction on Russia as a unit presented a greater mass of degradation with, “it's a huge losses of men and dislocation of the economy magnified all of Russia's

In 1914, Nicholas II declared war on Germany, a move that found an initial resonance within factories as well as politically and socially in Russia (Murphy, 2005). However, war quickly had a disastrous consequence for Russia because a series of military disasters (eg Masurian Lakes and Tannenburg) damaged the Russian Army during the early stages of the war, followed by repeated losses of troops as the war dragged on year after year. The poor supply of inferior weapons and supplies by the Trans-Siberian railway did not help and when troop numbers had to be bolstered by forcing peasants to fight, the agricultural and basic fabric of the rest of Russian society suffered (Pethybridge,

The strikes in the 1890s were becoming more organised as 97,000 went on strike in 1897 but Nicholas refused to do anything about the situation. He wanted Russia to modernise as an industrial company admirably but was less concerned what impact it would have on the workers. Both the strikes and the growth of opposition were long terms effects on the revolution.