Persuasive Speech Outline For Animal Testing

Some might ask what cosmetic animal testing truly entails. Companies use small animals such as mice, rabbits, and guinea pigs to test the safety and hypoallergenic properties of their products before releasing them to the public. Numerous tests are run for a singular product, such as the Draize test, the Acute Toxicity test, and the Skin Irritation test. The notorious Draize test shows the “irritation or damage caused by chemicals by putting them into the eyes of rabbits” (Abbott 144; Mcnamee et al.). After the substance is applied onto or into the eyes, they wait and see if there is any sign of eye irritation, corrosion, or permanent blindness. The Acute Toxicity

Specific Purpose – To persuade my audience that animal testing is wrong and how other safer alternatives should be taken.

i. According to Dr. T Page, Less than 2% of human illnesses (1.16%) are ever seen in animals. Over 98% never affect animals.

Utilizing animals as a part of research and to test the safety of items has been a subject of intense arguments for a considerable length of time. Individuals have distinctive affections for animals; numerous look upon animals as partners while others see animals as a methods for propelling medical research or encouraging exploratory research. However people see animals, the reality remains that animals are being misused by research offices and cosmetic organizations across the nation and all around the globe. In spite of the fact that people frequently benefit from effective animal research, the agony, the suffering, and the death of animals are not worth the hypothetical benefits for humans. Thus, animals should not be tested on for product safety or research.

Each of us can help prevent animal sufferings and deaths by buying cruelty-free products, donating only to charities that don’t experiment on animals, requesting alternatives to animal dissection, demanding the immediate implementation of humane, effective non-animal tests by government agencies and corporations, and calling on our alma maters to stop experimenting on animals. With the help of supporters we can expose and end the use of animals

Imagine, you are in an animal lab and there are scientists all around you. Now these people are not your friends. They put you in cages where you stay. Now they have shots that they give you every day. You never know what is going to happen to you next. You could throw up, get a disease, a horrible rash, and much more.

Not very many people think about the fact that a majority of the products they buy have been tested on animals, let alone animal testing in general. Animal testing has been going on for many years, with the use of dogs, cats, mice, rabbits, mini pigs, and farm animals. When someone brings up animal testing there usually is an argument about the pros and cons. Many people are against it because the animals are being harmed in the process. There are a few different ways to look at animal testing, lets get into them.

The experimentation on animals is not something that people think concern them and so they turn a blind eye to the harm that is being done. However, based on personal experience, once people are enlightened on the practices of companies they like to dismiss the notion by saying something along the line of, “How else will products be made? We can’t test on humans, that is unethical”. In creating my Controversial Definition paper, I wish to cover how unethical these practices are towards animals while also covering the alternatives that companies can begin to use in place of animal experimentation. In order to provide information for both sides of the discussion I first plan on using basic research methods so that I can educate myself before educating others. Once I have an understanding of the morals and ethics, or rather lack thereof, behind animal experimentation I will be able to expand on the information so that my audience can comprehend the issue at hand. Secondly, I plan on using applied research in order to demonstrate to my audience the alternative methods out there that allow companies to stop animal experimentation while also providing safe products for

This is an annotated bibliography of animal testing and research to see if it’s morally justified. There are many opinions on the results and the entire process that it takes to test or experiment a cosmetic product or a medicine on an animal. There are many alternatives and benefits to animal testing but is it really justified? Or could animals be in potential danger.

Some experiments include skin and eye irritation to when chemicals of the product make contact with eyes or shaved skin. Scientists do similar actions to rabbits without any pain relief. They also force feed the animals the product that deal with the mouth, such as lipstick, chap stick, and lip gloss to discover any signs of illness or any other specific health hazards like cancer or birth defects. And lastly they determine the “lethal dose.” Meaning, how much of the product would you have to consume for death to occur, inevitably killing the animal being tested. Many animals are killed by suffocation, neck-breaking, and decapitation. Pain relief is never provided for the experimented animals even when they are obviously in discomfort (“Fact Sheet: Cosmetic

Using animals in research and to test the safety of products has been a topic of heated debate for decades. According to data collected by F. Barbara Orlans for her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, sixty percent of all animals used in testing are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing (62). People have different feelings for animals; many look upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research. However individuals perceive animals, the fact remains that animals are being exploited by research facilities and cosmetics

Animal testing, although a controversial topic, affects a great deal of scientists and the work force in the agriculture field. This topic has proven difficult to communicate to one another about because there are individuals that believe animals should have certain rights and others believe that animals have no rights. Our group wanted to research this topic because we want to gain knowledge and become more understanding toward the people on both sides of the spectrum. Digging more into the research we found that cosmetics, medical use, and food are the most widely used methods for experimentation. With these research fields, people are finding ways to appeal to the ethics of the modern-day consumer.

The creation of a new product, should not cause animals to suffer and die. Because humans want a new lip color or a new type of eyeliner, does not mean that numerous animals should be immensely tortured and at times to death. Many argue that in order to ensure the safety of a product, animal testing is necessary. However, in today’s scientific world, this is not true. Many people argue that animal testing is cheaper, but according to Consumers ' Research Magazine writer Beatrice Hunter, it costs 500,000 dollars per product to test something using animals, as opposed to alternatives, which cost on average 50 dollars per product.

In this test the chemical being tested if force fed to rats or mice in small amounts until the dosage is in excess. This is continued until at least 50% of the test subjects die. Although the test rodent may not die right away, it may experience seizures and internal damage. This test is considered to be the most cruel of the tests and can only determine how much of a chemical substance is needed to kill a small animal not a human being.

There are numerous tests that animals are put through. Toxicity testing or testing determining if a substance is poisonous or not. Animals are exposed to chemicals through inhalation, ingestion, eye contact, and skin contact. They are induced or other words they were normal until a scientist inject chemicals, microorganisms, or other substances into them to produce a disease or to create symptoms of a specific condition. They are put in cages that are covered in their own feces and excrement in small cramped windowless rooms in a laboratory where they know they are going to die. They are bred to die and that’s their only reason they where born on this earth so that the scientists can test the effects of drugs and disease. Scientists actually stand and watch animals die from diseases. They induce hemophilia (excessive bleeding) in dogs, epilepsy (causes seizures) in mice, glaucoma (eye disease) in rabbits, and deafness in cats.