As the impacts of climate change continue to worsen, the time to make large-scale alterations in our way of life is now, but hesitancy is creating roadblocks for these necessary adjustments especially within the energy industry. Al Gore, former Vice President, Congressman, and presidential candidate, attempts to promote change in this sector by proposing a goal for 100 percent renewable energy in ten years. Gore delivers his speech to an audience advocates and skeptics at D.A.R. Constitution Hall in Washington, D.C. on July 17, 2008, and aims not only to persuade skeptics of the problems we are facing, but also to show skeptics and advocates alike how we can completely rethink our electric grid in ten years. Al Gore creates a convincing argument in 2008 for the case of switching the United States’ power grid to one run by renewable energy within ten years by implementing strategic logical appeals which include creating a sequential progression of facts and challenges, while lacing daunting scientific evidence of the time throughout his argument.
Gore gives his speech in the nation’s capital amongst supporters and critics alike at a time when great change was occurring, which helps his audience to understand the logic in acting as soon as possible. Gore makes a point to reference that the nation was at “the eve of a presidential election,” in order to portray to the audience that change was coming, and that a new leader may have more to bring to the issue of climate change
In his essay titled “Climate of Denial”, Al Gore, a well known environmental advocate and former vice president, verifies the reality of climate change and global warming. The piece is an attack on corrupt companies and news outlets that attempt to persuade the public that global warming is not a critical issue. Gore also earnestly conveys our environment’s current state and offers possible solutions that would increase awareness about global warming and begin to revert the planet back to a healthier, more sustainable state. The overarching purpose of Gore’s work is to call attention to the widespread climate change that is occurring. However, he also focuses on the corruption and bias within the media, and their attempts to conceal the truth about global warming. Writing to those who are conflicted about who to believe, he makes a valid argument that defends the beliefs of he and his fellow activists and encourages others to become more active in the climate change issue.
However, Gore does not just present the problem. He issues the challenge for the scientific community to seek ways to solve the problem, but he points out that these measures must be taken now. The problem is so severe that actions must be immediate in order to be effective. Comparing today’s environmental problems to the wartime challenges faced by the World War Two generation, Gore urges today’s citizens and scientists to rise to the occasion and be willing to sacrifice, if necessary, to solve the problems that society has created.
Beyond the emotional appeal to American greatness in solving technical problems, he presents compellingly logical and ethical arguments. He starts by calling out anyone who would ignore the threat of climate change, a blunt shot at many Republicans in Congress (26:11). The president adopts a nonchalant approach, essentially mocking anyone who isn't on board with climate science. "Look, if anybody still wants to dispute the science around climate change, have at it. You’ll be pretty lonely," Obama says. With tremendous confidence that his logical and ethical arguments cannot be countered, he attempts to win the day by overcoming any emotional
Although the climate scientists who say that the climate is changing (about 97 percent by some estimates) far outnumber those who don’t, Gore's comments indicate the strength of the
In 2010, Al Gore wrote an opinion piece in The New York Times claiming that global warming is a matter our generation must concentrate on in order to halt the rapid increases of change to our planet’s climate. He creates a strong, convincing argument by addressing and exemplifying issues pertaining to global climate change.
To ensure the passage of the Climate Stewardship Act, S. 139, in the US Senate before the November 2004 presidential election.
Is coal power the best option for Australia, as current ‘green’ energy options are unable to support our power needs now and into the future.
The Alternative energy industry in the United States has been at a steady rate of growth for the past decade, however there is still controversy over the use of renewable energies, their impact on the economy, and their impact on the environment. As controversial as the topic is, the argument boils down to a moral need to support environmental regulations, and an economical need to sustain domestic growth in the Energy industry of the United States. Mainly, the question is can alternative energy effective replace fossil fuels? There are of course arguments for both sides of this question.
The essay “The Climate emergency” is based on a speech made by Al Gore at Yale University in April 2004 to a room full of students. Al Gore is the former Vice President of the United States under President Bill Clinton. He is also an environmental rights activist. In the beginning of the speech the former vice president shares a story about his trip to a Shoneys Restaurant with his wife Tipper to draw the audience in. (300-301). Once he captures their attention he is able to focus them on his real message.
Specific Purpose Statement: To persuade my audience that that solar power should become the main form of alternative energy in the Unites States.
The world around us mostly runs on fossil fuels in order to produce electricity; however, there will be a period that comes where we will run out of those fossil fuels. We only have so much time before a crisis hits and we have nothing left to produce the energy we need. In order for our country to produce the energy and electricity we need, we must do something about it. As a country, we must figure out how we can make the switch to using more renewable energy before it is too late and we run out of fossil fuels.
For nearly everyone on earth, fossil fuels are a part of our daily lives. Some of the more obvious places to find petroleum products would be gas and diesel in cars and trucks, but it is in more than just your tank. Without fossil fuels, we would not have things such as plastic to make a wide variety of things such as tires, kayaks, or even computers. The question remains, do we need fossil fuels?
The most of global energy production produces from fossil fuel such as coal, oil and natural gas. The vast fossil fuels generate energy which use for many purposes for instant residential, transportation and industrial sectors. While the rate consumption of fossil fuel higher than their formation leads to oil price crisis. Another concern of fossil fuel combustion is the impact on the environment. Global warming is a significant problem which results in increasing concentrations of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. These problems drive researchers and societies to search alternative energy such as switching to renewable energy or carbon-free energy to replace fossil fuels. For example Nakata et al., (2011:465) show ‘low-carbon society’
When the new Southeast Polk High School opened they added many new energy saving products. This included installing geothermal heating under the high school cutting back on the cost of heating such a large building. Many new windows help save on energy used to light the building along with automatic lights that turn off after several minutes without movement. The new high school shows how easy it is to save money and help the environment. Renewable energy is good for all aspects of the U.S, providing jobs, economical growth, environmental cleanliness, and new research for improving energy efficiency. Therefore the United States should use renewable energy to benefit the economy and environment.
“In 2016, nuclear energy accounted for 59.9 percent of U.S. emission generation,” according to (greenpeace.org). This is nearly as much carbon dioxide as would be produced from some 118 million cars per year. To think the United States is funding an operation that is slowing, but surely doing damage to the environment is profound. There are other options then to only relying on hazardous nuclear energy as a source of power. Just by making the switch to using renewable energy resources would cause the amount of pollution released in the U.S to drop by a little over thirty percent, and the cost of production would decrease by more than fifty percent of what it is today. Removing nuclear power plants and implementing the usage of renewable energy resources throughout the U.S. would be highly beneficial because it would cause less damage to the environment, it would allow for a cost effective alternative source of energy, and it would reduce the vulnerability of the public.