Persuasive Essay On Electoral College

Lastly, the Electoral College obliterates equality in politics. Although Illinois has 12,830,632 people, it only has 20 electoral votes (Doc. D). On the other hand, the populations of Alaska, Delaware, Washington D.C., Hawaii, Idaho, Maine, Montana, North Dakota, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming equal 12,500,722, but their electoral votes add up to 44 (Doc.

As a result, many of the larger and more populous states are being cheated out of their fair share of representation because of smaller states. In the article, Time to End the Electoral College it states, “Today the college, which allocates electors based on each state’s representation in Congress, tips the scales in favor of smaller states; a Wyoming residents vote counts 3.6 times as much as a Californian’s” (Doc L). In a democracy each person's vote should be equal. Conversely, the Electoral College denies the fact that all people’s thoughts and beliefs are valued equally. Larger states like California and others are being cheated in every election and aren’t getting the fair representation that the people living in those states deserve. In the video, The Trouble with the Electoral College it quotes, “ Californians are ten votes short of what they should get” (Vid H). This vote redistribution is taking electoral votes away from larger states and giving them to smaller states. This is making it seem as though there are more people in less populated areas and less people in more populous urban

The Constitution Convention of 1787 gave birth to the system of Electoral College. According to the Constitution, electors per state are equal to the number of seats each state holds in the Congress, which include the Senate and the House of Representative delegations. California holds the most Electoral which is 54 electors. However, with every census the numbers of each states electoral change due to the process called reapportionment. Reapportionment can be defined as the “the process by which congressional districts are redrawn and seats are redistributed among states in the house ; reapportionment occurs every ten years.” The Electoral College should not be preserved because it is unfair due to the fact that candidates who do not win plurality of the votes can still get electoral votes. It is unfair to depend on the 538 Electors to become the voice of three hundred and nineteen million people.

The electoral college has a major corruption through the fact that each vote is represented by a different percentage of a state’s population. Wyoming has one vote for every 187,875 citizens, while California has one vote for every 677, 345 citizens.(Document 2). This turns away any constant in the amount of voters

The Electoral College is unfair to the people in bigger states. The people may feel like they dint have

The Electoral College, first instituted in 1787, is designed to give all states in the United States a say in who the president will be. The Electoral College works by giving a vote to each House Representative and Senator for the state. The senators and representatives for a state cast their ballot based on the popular vote in the state. Whichever candidate gets the most electoral votes in the state gets all the electoral votes for the state; this is called the winner take all system. Many people believe the Electoral College is flawed and should be changed while others believe it should be thrown away altogether. There are many things about the Electoral College that should be changed but the system is not completely broken. The Electoral College is a flawed process, but one that is needed for a fair election. The way electoral votes are given is fair but, how a President is chosen with no majority, which is a requirement to become president, and the winner take all system are ineffective and must be changed because they do not reflect the true will of the people.

The Electoral College is an institution that has existed for since the early 1800s, but the purpose of the Electoral College remains a mystery to many people. In a country where the president is supposed to be elected by and for the people, why is there an institution that controls where all the votes from a state go? The Electoral College should be abandoned because its system of voting does not represent the people, the electors could easily vote for whomever they want, and because the Electoral College gives more power to some states than other. When a citizen votes, he wants his vote to count; this is a right guaranteed to him and all other citizens by the constitution. However, if he votes for a candidate who receives only 49% of the vote while another candidate receives 51% of the vote, all of his state’s electoral votes will go to the other candidate, with the exception of two states.

However this is not the case, for example, 38.8 million people live in California this means they should get about 65 electoral votes, they are getting 10 votes less than this. These ten missing votes are distributed to states that should get 1 or 2 votes. In fact, one vermonter has the power of three texans in the voting booth. The fourth reason the Electoral College should be abolished is it gives some people no reason to vote. Certain votes do not matter.

This makes it hard for the people of the U.S to feel that they actually had an effect in the presidential election. "A presidential candidate could be elected with as a little as 21.8% of the popular vote by getting just over 50% of the votes in DC and each of 39 small states." (Jesse Ruderman 2) The popular vote isn't guaranteed because of this Electoral College. If a state has a majority of Democratic voters then the Republicans do not have a chance in winning the electoral vote for their state. This makes the system unfair because Republicans are not being represented in this state's vote. The republicans still have a slight chance because "there is no constitution provision or federal law that requires electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their

It is crucial to understand that when the electoral college was first developed it was different time, lacking certain thing that we currently possess today. In the specific era of time, it may have been the best option, but times change and technology advances, leaving no area of need for the electoral college current day. The electoral college was first devised during the Constitutional Congress of 1787, almost 230 years ago (Jefferson- Jenkins). In a new country, weary of any national government power and states possessive over their own rights and powers, it seemed to be the most suited option for the new country. It’s goal was to reunite feuding states and ease the mind of less populous states with the addition of senatorial electors. Overtime and even more so today, the power of the of national government has greatly expanded,consequently removing the need to accommodate the suspicions of the people.

This past election has raised several questions and issues, one of them being on the effectiveness of the Electoral College. Though Clinton won the popular vote with a margin of 2,868,692 votes, Trump won the presidency because his electoral votes were greater. Many were confused as to how this could happen, but looking at a map of the U.S. county-wise, it is somewhat more believable. Most of Clinton’s votes were concentrated in major cities,unlike Trump’s which were more widespread. This allowed him to cast a wider net to collect more electoral votes. Despite this being the reasoning behind it, many question if this is the right path. In truth, the Electoral college system is very faulty in the sense that it misrepresents a large portion of American Citizens. Therefore, it requires several changes, i.e. converting to a proportional system rather than winner-take-all, to be made so it could better reflect the will of the people, without dismissing the entire establishment as a whole.

The Constitution of the United States of America created a system called the Electoral College where it outlines the rules in which we elect the President of the United States of America. As stated in Article 2, Section 1 of the U. S. Constitution created the Electoral College. Each state receives as many electoral votes as it has senators and representatives. Therefore, each state, including the District of Columbia, will have at least three electors. This is the vision of the Constitution. Now the problem arises when all the Electoral votes from one state are given to the popular winner for that state. This causes a with people’s right to chose their leader as votes of the people that voted for the losing candidate are tossed in the trash. All this while giving the state the ultimate power to elect the president.

Does a United States citizen think that electoral college is democracy's safety net? The people of the U.S. have their own opinions about Electoral College. Some disagree on the topics that Electoral College discusses, and some agree. Most U.S. citizens should support the electoral college because it prevents majority rule, the US needs the electoral college more than ever before, and the intentions of the founding fathers held the abhorrence in the US.

Do you believe the electoral college is the ideal method to vote for the next president of the united states? I do not agree with this method of choosing the president and I think the popular vote should be the method of voting instead. In the Electoral College you vote for someone to vote the president for you which defeats the purpose of voting. Especially since that person legally doesn't have to vote for who you want. Also the electoral college makes voting more complicated which differs from the popular vote method which is easier by just counting votes and the winner would be who has the most votes. My last reason for abolishing the Electoral College and using the popular vote method is it would help other parties instead of just the Republican and Democratic parties. As third party candidates never won due to the electoral college being more helpful to the other parties.The electoral college is a complicated and not fair way of voting for the president. The process defeats the purpose of voting and most of the time helps only two parties which give the other parties a very low chance of winning.

Every four years on Election Day, millions of Americans flock to ballots in every state, anxious to cast their votes. Who could blame them? After all, voting is a very important part of our democracy, especially when it comes to choosing our next president, since it will be him or her who represents the people of our country. Every vote counts. Or does it? What if I told you that your vote didn’t count? Would you be surprised? Outraged? In our current voting system, the electoral college, a group of people chosen by each state to vote for the country’s next president and vice president, ultimately decides who will win the election. We do not even have the federal right to vote for president. For a fairer and more logical election, the electoral vote should not decide on who becomes the President of the United States of America.