Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

Muireann Quigley, in his article, “Non-Human primates: the appropriate subjects of biomedical research?” discusses the ethical issue of whether or not we should be using non-human primates in biomedical research. Throughout this article, Quigley raises the question is it ethical to perform testing on non-human primates? By looking at the accuracy of this testing, the type of research done, and the capacity of the subjects we can see that if the experiment is not ethical to perform on a human then it is not ethical to conducted on a non-human primate.

Lorie-Mae Nicolas Philadelphia Primate Study – Animal Experimentation Research involving animals are not always bad but there are certain instances where they have been neglected by researchers for the ‘greater good’. From monkey experiments, to animal sex experiments, animals have had cases where they’ve been treated poorly. As a result, laws and regulations have been put in place to protect some of these animals. William Russell and Rex Burch described the 3 R’s of animal research: replacement (avoid the use of any animals), reduction (minimize the number of animals used) and refinement (minimize the animal’s suffering). According to Animal Liberation, utilitarianism principles should be applied to animals.

Every year, a total of one million children die from pneumonia. If you multiply that number by one hundred, you will have the number of animals that suffer painful deaths due to medical experimentation in U.S. laboratories each year. This number includes animals of all types, from mice and rats to fish and birds. These animals are typically used because of tradition rather than actual scientific reasoning, making their deaths all the more cruel. Animal experimentation is not only unethical, but ineffective and expensive. It should be phased out and replaced with technological alternatives.

“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated” (Mahatma Gandhi). Scientists have been using animals for biomedical research for centuries. They provide a source to get information scientists can not get without harming humans. A lot of debate is spread about whether it is good or bad. Animal experimentation is a controversial topic because it is helpful to humans, but it is also cruel and inhumane.

For many years, animal testing has been very widely accepted in the world for the

Animal Experimentation has been dated as far back as to the Early Greek Era. This practice has been viewed as ethical by research scientists trying to find new medical breakthroughs. Yet, in recent years, the use of animals in research and experimentation has been frowned upon by animal protection groups and animal rights activists. Animals are protected by certain guidelines and ethics prior to their use in research. Contrary to popular belief, animal experimentation should be viewed on a positive note, due to the fact that it can benefit human life, reduce adverse effects on humans, and the cost is cheaper and easier.

Scientists have been using animals to test products for years. Animals are not confirmed in being helpful for product or medical testing. Ethical affairs and scientific limitations are some of the concerns in the testing of animals. In a recent statement made by the Institute of Medicine, the chimpanzees were not reported as being a necessity. Animal testing is immoral, because of the medical products needed testing, animals act as test replicas to reveal negative impacts and flaws in the product. The cost of chimpanzees is high, the well-being of the animals is worthy, the testing is discredited, and the ethical thinking is imprecise.

It's one thing to conduct animal testing on mice and rats, or even cats and dogs, but to use intelligent creatures like apes (primates),that is not very smart. The primates are genetically similar to humans with high intelligence abilities, which makes them stand out than the rest to scientists, but it is those same similarities that make testing on them inhumane. In

In today's world, more than 100 million animals are killed each year in the name of animal testing. Now as some might say that sacrifice is needed for the common good, it is safe to say that animal testing may be taking it over the top to get such test results for the "common good". Animal testing has been a common practice for many years to get results and side effects for food, drugs, pesticides, beauty products, and just about everything one uses in an average day. But now, in the modern world where ethics and animals rights come into the light, the subject of animal testing has become quite a spectacle to be fought over. In an interesting way, the debate over animals questions the humanity of the people of the world, and how far they

It is estimated that 25 million animals are used to conduct product testing for human use. These product testing’s can range from the shampoo we use to our medicine. There are many alternatives to inhumane and cruel tests done on defenseless animals. Banning the testing of products on animals in the U.S. would end the suffering and wrongfulness towards animals.

Thousands of animals are hurt and even killed because of animal testing every year. Scientists use animals of all kinds, apes, mice, rabbits, cats, etc. to experiment on. These experiments range from giving them drugs, to see what effect they might have on humans, to testing what extreme heat would do to the human body. The outcome of these experiments are often harm and even death. Animal testing is not morally justified because it causes harm to live animals, there are suitable alternatives to animal testing, and there are too many differences between humans and animals to be able to call the outcome “Accurate”.

There exists a society that routinely tortured animals by immobilizing them, pouring chemicals into their eyes and on their skin, and causing them unbearable suffering followed by a prolonged and painful death for the purpose of making its cheeks a little rosier or lips slightly plumper each day. This is the reality of the United States and hundreds of other countries that employ the method of testing on animals in order to prove safety of cosmetics. According to Karyn Siegel-Maier, “The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C) defines a cosmetic as any product that is applied to the human body to moisturize, cleanse or in some way enhance or alter appearance,” meaning humans constantly

There are about more than 100 million animals that are killed in laboratories. Animals are innocent and many of them include mice, rats, guinea pigs, hamsters, cats, and dogs. These animals are harmless and can not defend themselves from us sometimes. It is evident that no animal should be tested on.

Many people have opinions on animal testing. Whether or not we, as humans, should test medicines and treatments on non-human subjects has been argued for many years. Scientists should test medicines and treatments on animals because it helps them understand how diseases work and how they react with medicines.

Observation and experimentation are how we as humans have been able to learn more about ourselves and the world and universe we live in. One of the most common methods of experimentation is animal testing. However, there are controversies surrounding animal testing. There are some that believe animal testing to be cruel and overdone, advocating for the eradication of the practice and further reliance alternative research methods. Groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and other animal rights advocates fall in this category. There are some that believe animal testing to be an invaluable resource and should continue, such as some scientists and research groups. However, there appears to me to be a consensus that is closer to the middle: the belief and understanding that while there are benefits to animal testing, there are flaws in the practice and there should be changes to increase its efficacy while we simultaneously explore alternate testing methods. Many scientists and the National Institute of Health (NIH) subscribe to this idea. I aim to explore the benefits, problems, and implications of animal testing in order to reach a more informed conclusion about a position that is most validated by the information I have used.