Peaceful Resistance To The Government And Its Impact On Society

I believe that peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society. Peaceful resistance has been used by activists for hundreds of years, examples being Mahatma Gandhi and even the founders of the United States. Peaceful resistance has consistently been used as a way for people to convey to their government their views and their feelings in a nonviolent and amicable way. It has been used as a tool for people such as the women of the Suffragette Movement, the people of the Civil Rights Movement, and even for people today to stand up for what they believe in and to make their voices heard.

Peaceful resistance in today's society is counted as just as bad as violent riots. As Americans with our constitutional rights should have the ability to peacefully resist anything that we find unjust but within current events it is seen as being a criminal for showing your opinion. I believe that peaceful resistance should have a positive impact on our country and that it should be seen as powerful rather than as weakness caused by the displeasure of events. As a country it is our job to take into consideration the rights and beliefs of all rather than few. For example within my own community there was a peaceful resistance or peaceful protest at our local university in which around 70 to 100 people were arrested simply for showing their

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society. As a society there is nothing stronger than "We the people". Our silence and words speak louder than any actions of ours ever could. Rosa Parks did not scream or fight back against the policemen or the people who tried to make her go sit in the back of the bus. She just sat there quietly which scared people.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. It has a positive impact to a free society because most people would generally oppose taking the consequences for an unjust law, calling it absurd. By demonstrating to a society that you can make a difference by remaining peaceful to remove an unjust law, you will likely gain followers. This is good because one individual isn?t enough to change a law by protesting. Instead, a group or community can eventually make a difference to removing or altering unjust laws by performing civil disobedience.

In my opinion I believe that peaceful resistance is a positive impact on our society. If you look at the many marches we have had in recent years, such as the woman's march held a little over a week again as well as all the recent protests involving this years election, you can see Americans expressing their opinions and beliefs for all to see.

Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? I think that peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society. Many people used civil disobedience to prove a point in a situation that they believe needs to be changed. There are people such as Henry Throeau, Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks. Many people say that Henry Thoreau is the backbone to civil disobedience. Thoreau was arrested in 1846 for refusing to pay six years of poll taxes in protest of slavery and the Mexican American War. Thoreau believed that individuals could be free only if their actions were true to their own beliefs, with or without the support or approval of the community. Thoreau inspired Gandhi first and then MLK to follow, but these two leaders are responding to more pressing circumstances and responding as members of subjugated classes of people sharply defined by the social markers of race and ethnicity. Another important person who used civil disobedience is the same person who said "You must be the change you wish to see in this world" -Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi used nonviolent civil disobedience to protest racial pass laws in South Africa and in India's Independence struggle, including the famous Salt

I think peaceful resistance to law positively or negatively impact free Society because it demonstrates that people are in their country to live for every name. Rosa Parks was an amazing example because she knew the long respected it but chose not to follow it when she sat in the front of the bus. Amazing Minds like Marther Luther King jr. Was also an amazing example that you can possibly save the things you want to say and he went to jail but he chose to continue to fight for what he believed in. Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau is an amazing piece of work it shows people that you can respect it but you don't have to follow it in every aspect. In the letter to Birmington Martin Luther King Jr. Demonstrates that he can possibly write

Peaceful resistance to laws most definitely has an impact on a free society, but it can be debated on whether that effect is positive or negative. For example, the effect might be negative in the case that others in the society view this act of peaceful protesting as an uprising or a rebellion. There’s a possibility that people will be protesting without grasping the concept of what they are fighting for. On the contrary, the effects might be positive in the case that other individuals in the society see this act of peaceful resistance and use it as a benefit to constructively work on bettering their society.

Peaceful resistance does not negatively impact a free society. In having the right of free speech and the right to a peaceful protest, the people can express their opinions to their political leaders. These political leaders want to keep their jobs, and will listen to what the people are saying, and will then make changes to policy that make life more free for the people. In the case of pre-Revolutionary fighters like Paul Revere and John Adams, peaceful resistance meant throwing British tea into the Boston Harbor and promoting the halting of consumption of British goods.

Peaceful resistance to laws not only positively impacts a free society, it is necessary for a free society. We could not truly be a free society if we the people could not protest laws and ordinances that we think are unjust. The reason for the Revolutionary War was unjust treatment of the citizens of Britain that lived in America. The British government was taxing the Americans without representation. It was their right as British citizens to be represented and to deny them that was to deny that they were citizens. Thus, Americans declared their independence from Britain and fought a long hard war in order to form a nation that would treat it's citizens fairly. The beginning words of the Constitution are: "We the people of the United States, in order to

AI believe that peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it allows people to say how they feel, and they do not have to go to extreme measures to feel like they are being heard. A lot of violence that goes on in other countries occurs because the people just want to be heard by their government and want to have a say. Peaceful resistance has been around since before Mahatma Gandhi's time, however he strongly believed in it. He believed in peaceful resistance because he thought that the government would listen more and be more open to change if the people were not attacking their soldiers and killing others. By using the tactic of peaceful resistance, one is opening up the fight to those who are young, old, or disabled and otherwise

In a good way. People who voice their opinion are the people who are responsible for the positive impact on society today. If people around the world never acted in such a way as in a peaceful resistance, it's possible that it would've taken a longer time for the world to form the society it has today; because people would resist but not in a peaceful manner. I believe that before people had the idea of a peaceful resistance and if people never took advantage of it in the past, that, that's when the negative impact on society comes in. I don't think that peaceful resistance could ever leave a negative impact on society in such a way that physical resistance would. A physical impact leaves room for terror and more violence and its a risk in such a way, that it would be an easy way to lose your life. The difference between a peaceful resistance and non peaceful one is the physical act. In a peaceful resistance, one is not fighting back in any harmful way to themselves or others. As opposed to a non peaceful resistance, people are simply putting their lives at risk for something they believe in; when one can easily do that in a much more safe manner such as a peaceful resistance. Which is another reason why I believe it has a positive impact on society. It gives the option to fight back but not physically. Being physical causes more of a surge and a riot full of angry people as opposed to non physical actions where people form protests and fight for what they truly believe in, (non physically), because they are determined and strong. They don't just fight because they are angry. That is one of the biggest differences as to why peaceful resistance is not a negative impact on a free

I believe that peaceful resistance to laws negatively impacts a free society. Peacefully resisting to laws negatively impacts a free society because when one issue is covered, then there are people trying to spark up different resistances for other matters after seeing one either work or try to improve on it, these protests incite anger and chaos among the people that are not involved in the protests and have to try and work around them. Furthermore, not all "peaceful" resistances are always peaceful, there will always be radicals in every group that is created, people that will not want to be peaceful and incite violence among others. Peaceful resistance is not as needed as it was earlier in the United States' history, groups that peacefully resisted in the 1950's-1960's had very important reasons for doing so, meanwhile groups today will peacefully protest on things that do not have a

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society. The civil activist leaders that fought for our rights, put up with a lot to get us to where we are currently at now, and we have been taking it for granted. Boycotts, and sit ins are great examples of a non-violent approach to keep the harm away from our people. Today's youth are reversing this approach. They rather have destroy things like cars, windows, break into stores just to get their point across, which is not by any means acceptable. Although we do need a voices heard, there is always a way to go about things. I am not saying that destroying property can be justified but when our voices are NOT being heard, what else are we supposed to do. We can't sit around and wait for

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India’s independence