Patriot Act Pros And Cons

The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President of the United States of the confederacy George W. Bush on October 26, 2001(history.com).Republican president Donald Trump just released his plan on how to make Mexico pay for his proposed wall along the border. Trump explained he would use the Patriot Act to make it an actuality. The Donald laid out a s plan to force America's ally to the south to finance the Great Wall of Trump. His suggestion to use a "proposed rule" under the Patriot Act which is a controversial antiterrorism law as blackmail to make Mexico to pay a lump sum of billions of dollars continues to flow their country year after year.

For anyone reading who does not remember the aftermath of 9-11, let me boil it down for you. By playing the terrorism fear card, Hoover’s boys got their wish for expansive powers that circumvented the need for those pesky nuisances known as “warrants”.

The first responsibility of the government is to preserve the lives and liberty of the people. After tragic incidents that resulted in the loss of many lives, a group of congress men vowed on preventing terrorist attacks in the future. The main purpose for the Patriots Act is to prevent future terrorist attacks by allowing the government to obtain library records for large numbers of individuals without any reason to believe they are involved in illegal activity. The Patriots Act has many pros and cons that we must take into consideration in recommending this act be passed. Should we support the Patriot Act or should we oppose it?

Have you ever had a suspicion of someone and wanted to know if it’s true? That is exactly what the government thinks and finds out. They collect info on potential people they suspect are terrorists or are related to any terrorist activities. The official Patriot Act was passed after the September 11th, 2001 terror attacks. The Patriot Act is actually an acronym for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism”. This federal act allows the investigators to use the same tools used for organized crime and drug trafficking, now in the fight against terrorism. “Why is it that the federal government could have wiretapped a potential mafia member’s phone, but not someone who could be involved in a terrorist group”. (-Senator Joe Biden). While the PATRIOT Act, and government surveillance in general, may be a controversial part of the legislation, the benefits it provides for the security of the United States makes it necessary in a world where terrorism has become commonplace.

The USA PATRIOT Act, which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act, was passed shortly after the attacks of 9/11. It was signed by President George W Bush because he believed that the act would help America bring a halt to terrorism. However, in his efforts to track down terrorism, the act also violated American privacy rights.

numbers (USA Patriot Act). This was the most significant and controversial provision because it allowed the government to surveil Americans without obtaining a search warrant, infringing on people’s constitutional rights. According to the editors of Gale Encyclopedia of Law, Title III of the Patriot Act was the “International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001” (“UNITING AND STRENGTHENING…”). This title prohibited money laundering, which is the concealment of the origin of illegally obtained money (“UNITING AND STRENGTHENING…”). This was significant when it came to prevent terrorists from obtaining money to fuel their attack. In fact, this provision charged 113 people with crimes related to financing terrorists, resulting in 57 convictions or guilty pleas (USA Patriot Act).

The primary initiatives of the Patriot act is to prevent terrorism by effectively utilizing already available tools; improving the information sharing process; utilizing technology to identify terrorists; and by increasing the penalties to those who commit terrorist attacks, terrorist related crimes as well as those who conspire and help terrorists (Department of Justice, n.d.). Prior to the Patriot Act, many of the tools that already existed, that could also be useful to prevent a terrorist attack but were not being used to their full potential, and that have been used for many years by law enforcement officers and federal agents to combat other crimes such as drug trafficking or murder crimes, were too difficult to utilize to combat terrorism

Shortly after the tragedy of September 11, 2001 that threaten the security and freedom of the United States, on October 26, 2001, Congress passed one of the most controversial act. The Patriot Act, signed into law by President George W. Bush was an effort to calm the fear of terrorism across the country and make American feel safe once again. The Patriot Act, on the surface, claimed to help strengthen American security by allowing them access to tools and whatever resources require to fight terrorism and ensure safety for the people. At the time, this act received tremendous support throughout the nation. However, as the people move on and fear begin to settle, some slowly realize the danger of the Patriot Act. The National Security Agency (or better known as NSA) were

The Patriot Act violates civil liberties by enabling unwarranted wire tapping leading to abuse by authorities, under the pretense of curbing terrorism. Although it's unknown how far reaching the abuse really goes, information concerning the unconstitutional violation of civil rights by the NSA, DEA and other security administrations is constantly being revealed by the media. Legal experts have suggested that the USA PATRIOT Act erodes elements of several of the Bill of Rights to the US Constitution. This includes the First Amendment (freedom of speech and assembly), Fourth Amendment (freedom from unreasonable search and seizure), Fifth Amendment (right to due process of law), Sixth Amendment (right to speedy, public, and fair trials, right

Shortly after the attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, a law was enacted by the US government, commonly known as The Patriot Act. This law expanded the power of government allowing them to obtain the personal information of any person of that may be a threat in hopes of preventing any future terrorist act. Several of the provisions were set to expire in 2005. However, Congress passed the “US PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act” in 2006 in order to reauthorize

A few short years after the Revolutionary War, the newly formed United States of America needed a document to establish how its government was going to work. Thus, our government officials developed The Constitution. The first sentence is certainly wordy, but it gets the point across that the government is about to drop the layout of America as we move forward as a united nation.

Terrorism in the world is getting worse by the day, we keep getting more threats to our country. Finally our leaders found an act that allows more security for our country. This act helps us control terrorism in our country. The USA Patriot Act involves the war on terrorism and the threats they make against us. With this act, law enforcement can search houses and any place that is suspected of terrorist acts.

The USA PATRIOT Act was a law passed six weeks after September 11, 2001, which is in October 26, 2001, created by George W. Bush. USA PATRIOT Act is an acronym for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001”. Which is ironic due to the disagreements about the act that can be described as it is unconstitutional. Which are caused by the fact that the government is invading the people’s privacy by going through our phones, history of everything that is electronically, messages, phone logs, etc. without having a legal contract by the government, and going against our natural (unalienable) rights. It also violates the Bill of Rights, however, mostly on the first and fourth amendment.

The September 11th terrorist attacks brought fear and anger to all Americans. People of all races did not know how to react to such a horrific tragedy. After these attacks were carried, former President George W. Bush declared a “War on Terror”. While this was happening Muslims in the U.S were in the middle of this issue. The War on Terror was focused on Muslim Citizens in the U.S due to media outlets and many people criticizing all people that are Muslims are radicals. With all said The Patriot Act was passed which many criticized because it was argued conflicted personal liberties and public discussion. George W. Bush praised the act for making America safer. However, it was a plan targeted primarily at Muslims and Arabs . Like American governments have done in the past acts like the Espionage and Sedition Act this is another one of acts that aim to target one group . “War on Terror” was not only declared on the real terrorists of Al Qaeda but it was also declared on many Muslims in the United States with the passing of the Patriot Act. Under these circumstances people’s rights are taken away and citizens and non citizens who are Muslims would be mostly of focused upon. It would give states the right to hold and investigate suspected terrorists with insufficient evidence .The Patriot Act affects people rights, goes against the Constitution and can invade people’s privacy by targeting one group and not given the rights people of the American government deserve.

The USA PATRIOT Act was ratified into law in October 2001 in response to the devastating terror attacks on America on September 11, 2001. Subsequently, President George W. Bush’s government increased their focus on the fight against terrorism. The acronym “USA PATRIOT” stands for, “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” (Doyle, 2001). This law is vitally important to America and plays a crucial role in the prevention of terrorism while imposing relatively minimal peril to the various civil liberties.