Particle Fever: Where Ideas Come To Life
Curiosity, one of the most fundamental of all instincts that drives humanity in a relentless quest for knowledge. This instinct gives rise to one of the biggest experiments in history, the making of the LHC-The Large Hadron Collider. The Particle Fever an acclaimed and award winning 2013 documentary film that takes the audience on an inspirational and breathtaking journey to witness the LHC come to life.
The documentary’s prime objective is to make the audience understand the importance of scientific endeavour and discovery, convincing them of the impact that it can have. The reason being that pursuing science/scientific research requires dedication, passion, ingenuity and collaboration combined with belief that the experiments that are being performed by the scientists can change the society and humanity as a whole. The importance of scientific discovery in conveyed in the documentary as it uses distinct techniques like imagery and symbolism to convey the ideas. As seen in the picture the circle that is drawn using a various colors symbolizes the Higgs boson and the contribution of theorists in the development of the theory. The second picture shows the particle accelerator/ LHC which depicts the work of the
…show more content…
This diversity extends across the experimentalists and theorists who share their experiences in an interview format which is shown in sections throughout the documentary film. The interviews are conducted using medium shots as they typically provide good framing angles for conversations. Close up shots are often used in the interviews to highlight tense situations. This technique is really efficient because it engages the audience into the character emotionally. It also adds authenticity as the interviews were recorded when the physicists were experiencing the events that occurred around
John M. Barry's ///The Great Influenza///, about the 1918 flu epidemic, explains how as well as why scientists commit to their calling. By the end of the excerpt, Barry, through his words, bases the nature of scientific research on uncertainty, which requires diligence, risk, and exploration out of exceptional scientists. Using rhetorical strategies, Barry characterizes scientific research as mysterious and dangerous, a research done by scientists who are pioneers, in a figurative sense.
He portrays scientific research as dangerous by declaring that a “single step can also take one of a cliff.” This further emphasizes the courage prerequisite to scientists and hearkens back to the fear of the unknown. The fact that all of one’s work may be dashed into pieces by a single finding in the laboratory conveys the tenacity of researchers. Barry’s description of the process by which a scientist decides which “tools” are appropriate to the task at hand, exemplifies the tedious and often inglorious labor involved in most scientific research. Barry finally predicts that if a scientist is successful a “flood” of colleagues and others will “pave roads” over the paths so painstakingly laid, taking one within minutes to the very place the scientist spent so long searching for. This suggests that in the wake of major discovery, the actual pioneer of this breakthrough may be forgotten. Countless researchers have made valuable contributions to the human understanding of the world, and faded into obscurity over the course of the history of science. Barry’s conceit conveys the fact that, like exploring uncharted wilderness, scientific research can be both treacherous and thankless, but all the more noble for
“Scientific research is for the curious and you have to precede significant problem and be committed to respond to that situation, so science is driven by need and it’s also incremental,” Morin said.
This essay will explore the varied criteria attached to the definition of Big Science. With such a vast array of opinions on the subject, an attempt will be made to simplify and rationalise a specific definition. Examples of The Manhattan Project and the research conducted at CERN will be investigated to this end, and the former will be examined for its perceived effect on Big Science.
Firstly, according to Bucchi, M (2008), in the continuity model of science communication, the science is slowly and continually moving from expert areas to the public scientific communities and the popular level in the end. However, in the science information movement process, information can be “transformed” as it moves from levels to levels. Take the study about the effects of level of flappin on chocolate during pregnancy as an example. This example was mentioned by Oliver in the video. For this study, the results showed that there was no difference founded, however, when it came to television, the study results has totally changed. Based on this example, we can see that after scientists publishing their studies, the information or study results can be largely changed when they are transmitting from stage to stage. Secondly, the researchers and TV producers will choose and manipulate particular kinds of science study to broadcast according to the feedback from audiences, and the problem is they oversimplified the science. This could also mislead the
Documentaries have always contained point of view and persuasion. The art of documentaries is manipulation of an audience for a purpose, as John Greison says “documentary film is the creative treatment of actuality”. The first documentary “Home of the Blizzard” was created in 1913 by Frank Hurley Productions. It was the world's first insight of experiences through a screen. In 1922, the first successful documentary, Nanook of the North, was documented by Robert J. Flaherty, though the black and white reel film caused a lot of controversy for portraying staged events as reality. Nanook of the North was published for the purpose of persuasion, conveying the directors view of the eskimo life by voice over narration, using a Bell & Howell camera,
Particle fever is movie about a single experiment, which lasted 19 long years and consisted of 10,000 hardworking and dedicated scientist. The whole experiment was to find a particle called the Higgs Boson. The Higgs Boson was a particle that most scientist thought held all things of the world together, to prove this theory that they had made the scientist had to conduct a thorough experiment.
The one word to describe “research” is “discovery” and the one word to describe “discovery” is “curiosity”. As the modern world is vastly diversifying everyday it is very difficult for the average simpleton not to be curious how the world around us is changing for the good and the bad. Like any average person, we deal with many hardships within our lifetime, given the amount of resources in the world we can make a change and turn those hardships into history. I promised myself I was not going to be a bystander in my lifetime. When I was at a very young age my father was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis. Not knowing at a very young age how greatly this would impact my life, this condition had no cure and to this day still does not. As the disease
Science is a beauty of discovering the undiscovered. Most of the scientists are generally well respected, and they are the important aspects of the society. What distinguishes the ‘good scientists’ among the ‘bad scientists? Passion and the ethic in the field of the study really show the differences between the good and bad scientists.
My waking brother preparing for work, the only clue that it was seven o’clock already. By this time, I would have made a two hour dent into the endless amount of material and educational videos about science, from recent discoveries and ideas such as the limitless potential of metallic hydrogen, and proposed and conducted treatments for harmful algal bloom in our own Great Lakes to the history of setups and labs that have led to the foundation of knowledge that is studied in school such as the experimentation which led to Sanger
Scientific research is always evolving, constantly progressing, improving and being modernised in order to reflect changes in social and cultural morals and values as well as to adjust to the relevant issues in the current society.
However, science must not be in the having mode, but rather it must be humble to avoid overconsumption and eventual catastrophe. The purpose of science is to learn and to become better citizens of the world (or to become one with the world). However,
Without physics, there would be no internet, nuclear weapons, airplanes, or advance technology in general. Isaac Newton is one the biggest contributors to the advancement of physics and the understanding of the world. Another contributor to this is Albert Einstein, the greatest physicist of the modern era. In Philip Shane’s highly informative film, Einstein: The Real Story of the Man Behind the Theory, Einstein’s story on his theory of general relativity is brought to the surface through the use of scientific expert analysis, demonstrations of Einstein’s ideas, reenactments, and the creation of the documentary’s atmosphere.
The observation of nature and the formulation of a hypothesis is the back bone of many scientific experiments today. This allows for many observers or scientists to product a conclusion based on statistical results of the phenomenal (SOURCE). The result of the scientific method has produced much technological advancement and has solved many practical problems (Bocking, 2006). Many inventions by science has given power to scientist and their work, this “authority of science” as Bocking (2006) describes it, allows power to reside in science and allows for it to be trustworthy enough to be part of many political decisions. This authority has placed a status on science as a provider of reliable knowledge (Bocking, 2006). In many
The public needs scientist to create a bridge between the scientific world and the communities. Scientist work for the community, for the people, the common good, and people are supposed to feel a level