P Alleges Vs. Miguel Tejada

P alleges false arrest. P alleges that he was grabbed and arrested by MOS outside his front door. P alleges that MOS informed his cousin that P fits the description. P alleges that he was strip searched at the precinct. MOS Michael Izzo observed two individuals engage in a hand to hand drug transaction inside the lobby of the building and radioed the description of the individuals. Defendant MOS Pizzarro, along with Sgt. Pichardo and MOS Jermaine Taylor observed two individuals who fit MOS Izzo’s description. MOS Pizzarro recognized one of the individuals as P. MOS Pizzarro had previously arrested P. MOS followed the other individuals into the adjacent building and arrested him. MOS recovered drugs from him. MOS Pizzarro came back to 2749

P alleges assault and false arrest. P claims he was a guest at a party when MOS arrived and recovered a firearm on the ground. P claims that he was not in possession of a firearm. P alleges that he was falsely arrested for criminal possession of weapon, sprayed with mace, and assaulted by MOS. Defendant MOS states that they were responding to a radio run for shots fired and a vehicle fleeing the scene. While canvassing the area, MOS observed a party in a yard which had very loud music playing and people were drinking in the street. Sgt. Arquer entered the party through the main entrance to shut down the party, and MOS Mayer entered through the side gate. As Sgt. Arquer was speaking to an individual, MOS Mayer observed P walking in his direction

P alleges false arrest for criminal possession of a weapon. P alleges that he and his two friends were helping his father in law move. P alleges that he was placing bags into a van when MOS approached and questioned him. P alleges that he informed MOS that he was helping his father in law move out. P alleges that MOS searched him and the bags without consent and recovered an antique long bladed knife and P was arrested. MOS stated that MOS Grieco, who was inside an unmarked vehicle with defendants MOS Mayer and Winters, observed P and two other males walking on sidewalk carrying what appeared to be electronic equipment. MOS Grieco approached P and began to question P. MOS Grieco stated that P did state that he was moving. MOS Grieco observed

P alleges that he is a drug dealer. P alleges that from March 2010 through January 2011 defendant MOS Tepperman extorted money from him. P claims that when he refused to pay, MOS Tepperman had P arrested. P claims that MOS Tepperman was earsdropping on his cellphone conservation and tracking his whereabouts through GPS. P claims he paid MOS Tepperman money to keep the police away from him. P states that he did sell MOS Tepperman a brick of cocaine in September 2010.

Tommy Ray James, the defendant, was stopped by an officer while driving and after failing to provide insurance the defendant admitted to drinking alcohol and open containers inside the vehicle and then the defendant was then placed under arrest, put in handcuffs, and advised of his rights State v. James, 301 Kan. 898, 1 (2015). The officer then searched the defendant’s vehicle for evidence of open alcohol containers and found what was later determined to be marijuana 301 Kan. at 1. The defendant denied the marijuana being his and said it could be his brother’s 301 Kan. at 1. The defendant however, said he did not know his brother’s phone number 301 Kan. at 1. After stating he did not know his brother’s phone number Tommy offered

P alleges temporary loss of his dog and false arrest. P alleges he was holding his dog on a leash on the street when MOS grabbed and threw him to the ground causing P to let go of the leash. P alleges that the dog lunged towards defendant MOS and MOS shot at the dog. P alleges that he was cuffed and taken to the precinct and defendant MOS took his dog to an animal dog as a lost dog. P alleges that he had to pay $280 to retrieve his dog back. P alleges that MOS did not allow his tied his dog up. P alleges that the criminal charges were, later, dismissed. No other information is known about the case. It is unclear what role, if any, Defendant MOS Jeffrey Sisco, played in this

P alleges false arrest. P was arrested for shooting CW Flaming St. Fleur (non-party). At Grand Jury, Mr. St. Fleur testified that he was shot and turned around saw P standing there. P was indicted by a grand jury. Mr. St. Fleur went to the precinct and recanted his identification of P to Det. Torres. Det. Torres informed Mr. St. Fleur to go to the DA’s office. On 11/3/2008, Mr. St. Fleur spoke with ADA Thomas McManus and recant his identification of P. Mr. St. Fleur identified another person as shooter and claimed to the person in the neighborhood. P was incarcerated when Mr. St. Fleur stated seeing the shooter of the street. Criminal charges were, later, dismissed. P was incarcerated for more than 10 months. Mr. St. Fleur stated in an affidavit

Upon our arrival, Officer Ramirez and I witnessed the front door to the residence had been forcibly opened and was left wide open. The door frame was broken off and the deadbolt lock was still engaged. Officer Ramirez and I cleared the residence and did not locate anyone still inside.The cabinets to the entertainment center as well as kitchen cabinets were left open and items appeared to have been taken. I located a black and yellow Crowbar a pool table. The master bedroom appeared to have been

P alleges assault and false arrest. P alleges that he was standing on the sidewalk when MOS Familia, Sanchez, and Nunez grabbed him and demanded identification and pulled him inside the building. P claims that MOS accused him of buying drugs and searched him. P alleges that MOS pulled his arms causing one of his shoulders to be dislocated. P claims that when he screamed in pain MOS began to beat him on his torso, head, and legs. P claims MOS delayed his request for medical treatment. MOS state that they were patrolling the area and observed P inside the lobby of the building which was enrolled in the trespass affidavit program. MOS entered the building and approached P and asked him what he was doing in the building. MOS stated that P stated

P alleges assault and false arrest. P alleges that he was seated in the front passenger along with his friend Dennis Gambino (non-party) in Mr. Gambino’s car which was parked on the street. P alleges that MOS pulled up next them in an unmarked police car and instructed Gambino to open the doors. P alleges that MOS pulled P and Gambino out of the car and arrested him. P claims that another unmarked NYPD vehicle drove up to the location. P alleges defendant MOS Truscelli pushed against the car then MOS Panizzi, Truscelli, Velez, Smimov, Banghart, Litrell, and Delprete punched and kicked P causing to lose consciousness. P states that he was transported to Richmond Univ. Medical Center where he was diagnosed with a broken nose and other injuries.

P alleges false arrest. P alleges that she was hanging out with her friends after school when defendant MOS Jose Peinan became flirting with her. P alleges that she did not respond to MOS Peinan causing MOS Peinan to become angry. P alleges that MOS Peinan ordered two male MOS to arrest P and her friend, Marie Gonzales (non-party). P alleges that one of the male MOS patted her down and touched her breast. P alleges she was handcuffed and placed in a police van and taken to the 52 precinct. P alleges that she was denied food bought by her mother at the precinct. P also alleges that her request to have the handcuffs loosen was denied. MOS stated that they were conducting a UC buy and bust narcotics operation when P and Ms. Gonzales approached

According to police reports, on 12/21/2005, the defendant, Pelkey, failed to stop at a stop sign at 2200 F Street. An officer conducted a traffic stop and vehicle search. Other officers conducted a search of his residence. Both searches discovered drugs as well as other evidence supporting the charges. The officers arrested the defendant for possession of methamphetamine, possession of methamphetamine for sale, and transportation of methamphetamine. The defendant went through processing at Headquarters and booking at County Jail.

Plaintiff claims false arrest and malicious prosecution. Plaintiff states he was arrested for criminal possession of marijuana however no marijuana was recovered. PO Hernandez, PO Bonet, and PO Heredia were members of the anti-crime in PSA 6. Officers observed via Viper camera plaintiff and two other apprehended individuals smoking marijuana in the park behind a housing project. Officers approached plaintiff and two individuals and conducted a stop and frisk. Officers did not recover any contraband or marijuana was recovered. Plaintiff and the two individuals were transported to the precinct where a bag of marijuana was recovered during a search at the precinct. Officers could not determine ownership of the marijuana therefore all three were

After the Supreme Court review the Wong Sun v United States case, the Supreme Court found that “Wong Sun statement could not be used to corroborate the second defendant’s police statement and the second defendant’s statement could not corroborate Wong Sun’s statement because neither statement was made during the existence of drug conspiracy” (Ingram p.89). Therefore, the Court conclude that the defendants of Wong Sun v United States case deserved a “new trial because there remained no admissible evidence against them” (Ingram

Barely 6 months after his last outing on the DS, Pac-Man is back in a brand new game. It is the yellow pill-poppers 25th anniversary however & his latest outing is a lot different from the rather bore boned first offering so I will refrain from comments like franchise milking. This time Pac-Man stars in his own 3d platform game but with a DS style twist.