P Alleges False Tort

Defendant MOS Horne and Jarvis were seated in a parked car and observed Ramarley Graham and 2 unapprehended males (non-parties). MOS Horne stated that he observed Ramarley Graham holding his waistband area and Ramarley Graham and the 2 males entered a bodega and looked around and quickly exited it. MOS Horne and Jarvis followed them in their car and put their description over the radio and stated one possibly armed. MOS Horne observed them attempting to gain entry to into various buildings. The 2 males were able to gain entrance into 728 East 229th Street, and waved to Ramarley Graham over. Then, 2 uniformed officers passed the location. Ramarley Graham exited the building and passed by MOS car when MOS Jarvis observed the butt of a gun in Ramarley Grahams’s waistband area. MOS Horne radio over

There are two Ps (Vance Williams and Rick Williams); they are brothers. P alleges that they were walking on the sidewalk with a friend, Davon Carr (non-party) when undercover officers stopped them. Ps allege that MOS questioned them about guns. P Rick Williams alleges that MOS Ashby grabbed him and slammed him to the ground. P Vance Williams states that MOS was punched him in the neck causing him to have an epileptic seizure. P Vance Williams alleges that MOS maced him. Ps allege they were taken to the 67th precinct. P Vance Williams alleges that at the precinct his request for medical attention was delayed. MOS Ashby states that he observed Ps Rick Williams and Vance Williams with open containers. MOS stopped Ps and Mr. Carr then P Rick Williams

Aguiar stated that Flores arrived just before he did to the call and that their initial contact with each other was ok. They both walked up to the location together searching for the entrance to the location. Once inside the location Aguiar stated that Flores seemed agitated not at him but at the people in the residence, perhaps because she was trying to deal with subjects who were intoxicated. Corporal Aguiar told me that the main reason he believed that Officer Flores had handcuffed Witness Vasquez, was to arrest her for 647(f) Public Intoxication. He believes this with 100 percent certainty because she had told him that she was going to arrest Witness Vasquez for 647(f) and that if she denied making that statement it would be a lie. Aguiar recalls with 100 percent certainty that Flores told that him, she was going to do this to avoid having to respond to the location again. He saw Flores double lock the handcuffs and began walking towards the rear exit of the location. Witness Vasquez kept saying “Por Que Por Que” in

PO Almeida stated that Sgt. Grimm was present on the scene as well as other UMOS but he doesnt remember who they were specifically. PO Almeida arrested two male and he continue to informed me that he arrested one and the other male was detained and his arrest was subsequently voided. While on the scene of arrest, he conducted a searched of Mr. Carlton Smith but he doesnt recalled the property he recovered on his person and the umos who trransported him to the 83 precinct. As for Mr. Joshua Riley he doesnt recalled who searched and/or transported him to the Precinct. PO Almeida stated that a vehicle belonging to the perpertrator was also taken into custody and it was transported by an Unknown UMOS to the 83 precinct. During the arrest process he vouchered vehicle intems, but he doesn't recalled how and who gave him the defedants property which

Larry was transported by AMR to Chino Valley Community Hospital. At Chino Valley Hospital, Larry claimed that he was Tased and was complaining of pain to his stomach and back. Larry was not Tased by OPD officers. I looked at Larry’s stomach and back and did not see any redness nor any visible injuries. I read Larry his Miranda rights from my department issued Miranda card. He said “yes” to all four questions indicating that he understood them. Under Miranda, Larry told me that today in the morning, his girlfriend, Stephanie Perez, dropped him off at work and they got into an argument. Larry said the argument was over Perez wanting to leave him. I asked Larry if he threatened Perez in anyway and he said no he did not threatened Perez. Larry said today at approximately 1730 hours, he was picked up by Perez from work. Larry said they drove to a check cashing place so he could cash his check. Larry said he and Perez got into an argument. The argument was again about Perez wanting to leave him. Larry said he took the vehicle key from the vehicle and went inside the store, preventing Perez from driving away. I asked him if he saw the police unit. Larry said yes he did however he was scared and did not want to be detained or arrested because he did not do anything wrong. Larry said he several times heard police officers telling him to stop running however he did not want to get arrested. Larry said he

The officers left Ms. Mapp’s home leaving one officer behind and returned several hours later with several more officers and again requested entry in to the home. The officers brandished a piece of paper, supposedly as a search warrant then proceeded to break in the door to the home. When the officers entered the home Ms. Mapp asked to see the warrant and as it was displayed took it from the officers hands and placed in near her body and or in her dress, the accounts differ here. One of the officers struggled with Mapp and eventually confiscated the paper from her. Subsequently Ms. Mapp was handcuffed for being, according to the officers “belligerent”.

Per NYPD complaint report, MOS went to the location in regards to a pick-up of a noise complaint. Per NYPD arrest report, P Santiago Serrano refused to turn the music down and cooperate with MOS. When MOS attempted to place P Santiago Serrano under arrest, he began to flail his arms and push the apartment door against other MOS. Did sustain back injuries. Per NYPD arrest report, P Jorge Perez preventing MOS from arresting others. MOS observed P Perez behind the apartment door propping his legs against wall placing his back on the apartment door using his legs to push door against MOS. P Perez ran into the bedroom and locked himself inside. MOS gained access into the bedroom and placed P Perez under arrest. Per NYPD arrest report, P Juan Lugo

P alleges false arrest. P alleges he was walking outside his apartment with a friend when MOS approached him and arrested him on drug charges. P alleges he was transported to PSA 1 where he was strip-searched. No other information is known about both incidents. It is unclear what role, if any, MOS Diana Pichardo, played in both

Medicare payments rely heavily on proper coding of medical procedures and services provided during the delivery of care. Those services or processes are typically bundled, and therefore allocated as a bundling payment that receives a set amount of financial compensation for the organization. The Medicare statute maintains that the Secretary of Health and Human Services determines the fee schedule for diagnostics laboratory tests and Medicare regulations state that the hospitals must bill some of the tests as a group (Ohio Hospital Association, et. al. v. Shalala, 1997). The District Court case involved the failure to bundle seven tests, which accounted for higher Medicare reimbursements.

We regrouped at Cox’s Corner Store and received information Ogden, Edward could possibly be at 41543 CR H.25 south of Mancos. Once on scene, I observed a female in the window of the residence who appeared to be on the phone. I contacted a female who identified herself as Gloriamae Casias DOB: 10/02/55. I asked Casias if she knows Ogden and she stated “yes, he is my boyfriend”. I asked Casias if she knew where Ogden was and she stated “he is on his way to work, down Mcelmo canyon”. I asked if she could contact him back and let us talk to him. Deputy Goodall talked with Ogden on the phone and Casias continued to talk to me. Casias asked if we were there because her ex-husband had been shot and that Ogden had been with her all night. I told her we are just trying to get in contact with Ogden because he was named as a suspect and I did not know any specifics on the case. Casias asked if the shooting was drug related and I

Per summons and complaint, plaintiff claims assault and false arrest for four different incidents. First incident (TPO January 19, 2013 at 2130 hours, 335 Sutter Avenue, Brooklyn), plaintiff alleges that he was driving and made a U-turn to get into a parking then MOS approached him and asked for his driver’s license and vehicle papers (registration and insurance). Plaintiff claims that MOS ordered him out of the vehicle and when plaintiff questioned them, MOS broke the car’s windows and back door. Plaintiff claims that MOS dragged him out of the car and assaulted him then arrested him. Criminal charges were, later, dismissed. It is unclear what role, if any, PO Rodriguez played in this incident. Second incident (TPO February 4, 2013 at 1928

Dispatch then advised over the air Ronald had an active warrant for FTA out of

There are most definitely ways that my business could be exposed to breach of warranty claims do to the nature of the product. My company could be subject to both an expressed and implied breach of warranty if my product fails to fulfill my written stated requirements on both quality and effectiveness of my product, a selectively inhibiting hair growth product. Due to the fact that my product would be a one of a kind on the market, I would create an expressed warranty to ensure potentially skeptical consumers that my product does indeed work, potentially even creating an expressed warranty that includes a money back guarantee. Misrepresentation could also be claimed by a plaintiff if my product falsely advertises that it inhibits hair growth. The implied warranty of merchantability could be breached if indeed my product did not inhibit hair growth, as my product would not fulfill the original purpose the product was created for.

She never knew if the police would respond to her call. She went further to explain that she was amused about how the police were treating her. She never knew that police were that organized, when she was making the call she never thought the police will link her to the incident and start harassing her. She was surprised that the police had changed and were now treating the public with respect. The officer even begged to stay at her place so that they could monitor the suspects and get a hold of them. The wanted men started appearing in the evening, and the police approached them in their house. They produced the warrant and started checking the house. No suspect was mishandled they all were treated with respect, and they freely allowed the police to inspect their houses. Procedural justice was highly observed in the whole process, and this created a positive image of the police. Observing procedural justice resulted in Miss Rodriguez giving sufficient information about the suspect and this facilitated the activities of the police since the suspects were well monitored and without their knowledge caught with bundles of drugs in several rolls. Observing procedural justice facilitates police actions and maintains respect and dignity between the police and the public (Dennis et al.,

Tort is a civil wrong that seeks to provide remedies from wrongdoings instead of punishing them :“The law of torts is primarily concerned with providing a remedy to persons who have been harmed by the conduct of others” . Over the years separate tors have developed in order to take into account different actions that would result in liability. Owners of land can suffer from various wrongdoings to their properties or to the enjoyment of use of their properties. Three main laws of tort that concern property are negligence, trespass to land and nuisance. Below each of these three torts will be explained, their definitions, legal principles supported by case law and the remedies available to landowners.