I believe that peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. It gives citizens the right to protest against what they believe is wrong without the use of violence. Although it is not right to purposefully break the law it is better to break the law in a peaceful way rather than in a way that could bring harm to other people. Civil disobedience commonly has to do with laws that conflict with people's moral beliefs. Gandhi used nonviolent civil disobedience to protest racial laws in South Africa and in India's struggle for independence. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others made civil disobedience a main turning point of the Civil Rights Movement. They defied the Jim Crow laws through sit-ins, boycotts, and protests.
In a free society, people are given the opportunity to stand up for what they believe in. I believe that the act of civil disobedience, or peaceful resistance to laws, positively impacts a free society for a number of reasons. Civil disobedience can have a positive effect when the government is flawed or when the law being resisted is wrong or prejudiced. In these situations, civil disobedience and peaceful resistance can mend some of the injustices that were being inflicted. All governments, including democracies, are flawed.
Though, I feel strongly that no law should be broken, I do see purpose in the peaceful disobedience provided you are willing to suffer the consequences. Therefore I would have to agree that it positively impacts a free society. We are all under strict laws and it is our freedom to either obey or not, with the latter resulting in consequence. Take for instance, the protest against injustice, the harmless act that took place in the Negro movement with Martin L. King. Not to mention the fact pointed out in Arguments against Civil Disobedience, sums up the fact that if we do not argue a point, another point would never be made. Not all situations are to be defended but some should. It is like a growth among us, which completely leads me to disagree with (as mentioned in the attacks), self-law making. There must be a form of discussion taking place (within certain levels of citizens) in order to advance in changes to laws as they were originally written. That is what makes us a free society.
In any society, change 2210-54382210-5438Civil disobedience is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? In your answer, incorporate the principles and specific examples (including current events) that support your conclusion. Examples include: Civil Disobedience-
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts our free society. It allows us to make our voices heard and spread a message if there is a law that we find is either unfair or goes against our protected freedoms. Peaceful resistance has helped our country grow on multiple occasions. It has always been a part of our countries history and is well protected by our First Amendment rights. Due to this, There is little to know doubt that peaceful resistance has positively effected the lives of many Americans.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it arouses concern and opens the eyes of law makers and others who are obliged to follow them.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society, because all committed acts of civil disobedience, all but in very different cases. Have shown a positive impact amongst the people by proving to everyone and the government that every U.S citizen has the freedom to fight for their rights and freedom and not let anyone disrespect their human morals.
In the letter from the eight Alabama clergymen, they felt as though those protesting should refrain from nonviolent protesting until the court system decides on their matter. The undersigned clergymen issued an "appeal for law and order and common sense," directing it towards the racial problems in Alabama. The clergymen made it clear that they felt, extreme measures in Birmingham will not be the resolution to the Negro community's problem, despite how peaceful they might be. The letter was meant to sound as considerate as possible, despite attempting to strip the Negro community of their first amendment god-given right. The clergymen feel as though it would be better to have have local leaders act on the matter, instead of gatherings
Civil disobedience is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? In your answer, incorporate the principles and specific examples (including current events) that support your conclusion. (500-800 words)
I believe that peaceful resistance to laws both positively and negatively impacts a free society. Civil disobedience is the refusal to obey certain laws and government demands one considers unjust, and accepting the consequences. The first amendment prohibits Congress to enact any law that would intervene with any person's civil rights. Though everybody knows this, why are there discussions about what people can and cannot refuse to do. Some people refuse to do things because it goes against their faith, which as stated earlier is allowed according to the first amendment. While others refuse to see what is right in front of them, in the very center of the Declaration of Independence.
Peaceful resistance to a law has a positive impact on society because it suggests that it is much better to protest peacefully instead of violently. Depending on the severity of the law and why a person decides to disobey it is perfectly fine since it's their right to stand up for what they believe in. For instance, Rosa Parks made the right decision when she was on a bus filled with white people and refused to give up her seat to a white person that came onto the bus. This matters because she peacefully resisted the law and white supremacy due to how she had the courage to do what she felt was the right act. This had a positive impact on society since it encouraged many Africans to stand up for what Rosa Parks believed in and that they would
Peaceful resistance to a law is exactly what a free society needs in order to manage the "free" status. If we were forced to obey every law without a say, we would not be a truly free society. Civil disobedience is one of the most positive impacts the people can have on their own government, especially one that claims to be one of the people, for the people, and by the people. When the people disagree with a law they have always and will always have a right to stand against it. It is a vital part of an American's first amendment rights: the freedom of speech (among other things).
I don't think anyone should resist the laws, wether it's peaceful or not. If you feel like you should resist then peacefully would be best. I don't think it would be a positive effect or negative effect. I think it would be more positive if you did it peacefully, if you didn't do it peacefully that's where it will become a negative impact. I think everyone has a right of freedom of speech and that they have to right to voice their opinion. At the same time there is a way to go about that. Having an attitude or being angry and resisting in an outrageous way is negative and the situation will just escalate. Many people don't think about both sides of the field. Many people only defend or see one side. "Most of the critics of civil disobedience, although they may not have expressed definitive
Civil disobedience goes far much deeper than just disobeying laws, it goes even more deeper than being peaceful and accepting consequences. It is one’s belief system. It is one’s passion. It is probably the one thing that people feel they know for sure. So when one goes against the norm, it is not a senseless “crime” so to speak. There was logic, there was passion, there was feeling, and most of all there was faith. I would like to say that faith is the biggest contributor. Faith is being able to take a leap without knowing the outcome of the action but hopes of the result in one's favor. I believe that peaceful resistance to laws can positively impact a free society. For one I believe that it is a push to open the opposing factors eyes, it is a factor that change really is inevitable and most of all possible, and lastly it gives the confidence and evidence that we are able to unite as one no matter what outside factors are.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. It makes sense for laws to be followed, but some laws are wrong. So are people supposed to follow laws that are wrong? Yes,the law is the law, and people have to follow it no matter what their opinions are. But they should try to change the laws if they could. People of the same opinion should gather together, start a petition or a silent boycott, like Martin Luther King did in the 1960's. As Rosa Parks, also civil rights activist of the 1960's once said,"You must never be fearful of what you are doing when it is right." This quote is true everywhere, especially in a free society like America where the Constitution guarantees that these rights are not to be oppressed.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India’s independence