1) The NLRB has made findings regarding the use of employee posts on Social Media sites to discipline or terminate those employees. Typically these cases occur when an employee posts “negative” information about their current employer or boss. Sometimes these are “public” and other times the employer uses “spies” or “fake friending” to see the Facebook page of the employee. Find at least one case or article online regarding this topic, and briefly explain the facts of the case, and the determination of the NLRB as to whether the employee was properly or improperly disciplined or terminated as a result of their use of Social Media to complain about, criticize, or publicly bash their company or boss. Provide the citation to the article …show more content…
Yes the employees know they were doing something wrong or doing it the wrong way that is made clear by how they made the video. If they did not know they were doing something wrong they would not have filmed the video by keeping their faces in the shadow so that they would not be retaliated against. However when you are trying to protect the safety of the population you should not have to fear for you job. With that said I know where the Rain City Contractors, Inc is coming from and being fast to react to terminate the employees. A company is always wanting to look for their own good. So when they find out that someone or a group of people that work for them and have insider information on the company they want to eliminate the source so fewer people hear about it and there is no loss in revenue. 3) Assume this case happened at a place you have worked in the past, or where you work now (or want to work.) Give an example of how the decision in the case above could lead to better or worse employee relations in your company. (5 points) If this situation happened at my current place of work the decision that the company had would have had an extremely bad reaction with the other employees at the company. Since over half the staff at the company I work for are not US citizens and the ones that are half of them are immigrants from all over the world. We
Facebook is the largest gateway to social media communication, allowing you to stay in touch with friends, family, and public. Therefore, if Jackson had concerns about a customer, the human resources department would have been a better option. They specialize in employee relation issues, while keeping all information confidential. In our business, we take pride in our image, while building trustworthy relations with all customers. Jackson’s behavior on social media could potentially harm the relationship with this customer, present and future customers. When one shares information on
These employees aired their frustrations on social media about the manager. The decision rendered in this matter was that Social media comments are protected concerted activity according to Section 7of National Labor Relations Act. Furthermore, because their postings were a continuation of the employees’ efforts to address concerns.
In addition, businesses should offer an example of a blog that would bring about justifiable cause for termination. Support from human resources in this way can assist in avoiding the high cost associated with employee turnover. Terminations and disciplinary actions that are related to the blogging of negative ethical issues through social networking possibly could be avoided also. Valentine, et.al (2010)
Litigation has replaced common sense and compassion in today’s world. Almost every dispute in today’s workplace is solved in court. There was a time when employee trusted and
The various forms of retribution that whistle-blowers endure at the hands of employers both financially and psychologically for attempting to correct mismanagement, fraud, and dishonesty are often too much for the whistle-blower to bear. Careers are in jeopardy because individuals with strong ethics decide to pursue law suits against their employers. One example is where the US Forest Service employees found their careers ruined by either demotions or loss of jobs when caught speaking out in favor of the environment or sound science, or when
When looking for prospective employees, employers do not enjoy rifling through Facebook pictures of obscene pictures and statuses with crude language. Bad behavior of employees, even off the clock, made public by social media
In our digital age, people are increasingly using social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace to share personal experiences, relati onships, opinions, and accomplishments with family and "friends." They view their Web sites as private and their right to voice their opinions or post pictures of themselves as protected free speech. Should employers have the right to terminate employees based on personal information that the employee has posted online? In most cases, the answer to this question is "no."
The purpose of this literary review is to enlighten my viewers of the importance of the ethical idea of companies crossing the lines of business with your personal life, when involving social media accounts. Most of my research has operated from the ATU library using the find it tool. Furthermost, the researched information use was from peer-reviewed research journal. I will discuss includes social media cons in the work environment, if it is ethical to get fired over a post, and laws that protect both parties. Social media includes an assortment of electronic communications—most commonly networking sites such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Myspace, Pinterest, Instagram, and the likes thereof. Social media also covers all forms of blogs, including Twitter (a micro-blog), wikis, online journals, diaries, personal newsletters, and World of Warfare and YouTube also are included under the umbrella term of social media (Lieber 2011).
Though the National Labor Relation Board (NLRB) strives to protect the employee’s rights. Still the employers terminate the employees either legally or illegally while considering their social media posts, with great serendipity. A decision issued by the NLRB board, after detailing the cases in Acting General Counsel memos on September 28, 2012. The salesman was fired from his job a week after posting the photos of an embarrassing car accident while selling the products on Facebook. The act made by the salesman was devastating the company’s service, and was neither concerned, nor protected by the NLRB, led him to lose his job (NLRB 2015).
P2: Content posted on social media should remain at the discretion of the employee posting it.
A growing hot topic, and cause for concern is the increasing use of social media in the workplace. The landscape for communication has changed, and the line between personal and professional communications has been blurred. How will your employer manage the risks associated with the use of social media and at the same time, gain the benefits that this media form provides? While many employers were initially concerned that employees would use company time and equipment for socializing with friends, they are quickly learning that many social networks can also be used directly for work purposes.
The use of social media has greatly influenced how people communicate. Facebook, one of the largest social media platforms, has over one billion active users. Employers find social media both useful and challenging. Companies now have a platform to reach millions of potential users of their products for marketing purposes. The downside is their employees also have access to millions of users. In the case of Peter Whitney, Peter’s employer terminated Peter for disparaging comments about co-workers on his personal blog. He views his termination as unfair. As this technology develops, employees need to self-censor their social media to prevent termination.
Social networking sites such as Twitter or Facebook have created a new ethical dilemma for many businesses. Corporations, small businesses, and even universities are struggling create policies to manage their employees social networking behaviors. Social networking access, particularly for recruiters, can provide personal information about potential employees, which would otherwise not be available. A business must follow statutes and guidelines when disclosing information to the public. Individuals on social networking sites have no such constraints. Employees can and do make comments about their employers online. Employers can and do watch what employees post online. Any individual can send or post potentially damaging information
“As the use of social media increases and becomes an integral part of nearly every student’s life, problems arise when student expression on these sites turns into threats against the school or other students, implicating both student safety and the speaker’s right to free speech” (Hughes 208). There’s no denying that social media has become a part of most people’s daily life. We have sites like Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, Facebook, Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn, etc. These websites, or apps, allow us to express ourselves in any way possible, whether it’s supporting families who lost a member in a mass shooting, trying to impeach the latest president, or donating to those who are victims of natural disasters. It’s not always that social
We cannot deny how big of an impact social media has on our lives now, not only on people but businesses too. It has opened a whole new door to the business world and given them a big opportunity to interact and attract a larger amount of customers. It’s given us a new and faster way of communication by exchanging pictures, stories, news, blogs, online discussions, etc. In exchange businesses have benefited by a long shot just by the click of a button. With the help of the Internet a company no longer is dependent on a particular customer base to survive because now it can reach out to a worldwide audience within seconds. It’s imaginable the countless business attributes of all social media to this day and still is growing. Social media