preview

Nixon's Involvement In The Watergate Scandal

Better Essays

“The accomplice to the crime of corruption is frequently our own indifference.” This quote by Bess Myerson seems innocent on the surface, but actually conveys an interesting idea. In saying this, she implied that if not for the lack of involvement by voters in the United States, the government would have less corruption and less secretive organizations. However, one situation comes to mind that expresses the opposite point of what Myerson indicates. As Nixon ran for office his second time, he had not yet performed any action that would lead to distrust from the American people. In fact, after winning reelection and beginning his second term, Nixon held an approval rating of sixty-eight percent (Kohut 1). His good favor, however, began coming …show more content…

New PACs formed with each election year and they had the ability to fund a candidate of their choice, and to force that candidate to try to carry out the organization's goals, no matter how detrimental. Ultimately, PACs lead to Super PACs, which, in addition to sharing many attributes to PACs, can raise and donate significantly larger sums of money, and hide the names of their donors for long periods of time. Additionally, Independent Expenditures organizations face no restrictions on the amount of money they can raise, and 501(c) groups can completely conceal the identities of their donors for the duration of an election season. In fact, 501(c) groups have become so powerful that they provide approximately half the money used during election seasons with the hope of swaying citizens to vote for their favored candidate. (Karlan 13) These organizations clearly demonstrate the effect and the power that money holds in both elections and the government in general. However, Pamela S. Karlan, a professor of law at Stanford Law School, shares this message: “However, money is only one symptom of a deeper political pathology.” This serves as a reminder that dollar bills can not singularly take blame for the uncertainty in our

Get Access