Nature Vs Nurture Debate

The historical debate regarding nature and nurture has been going on for years and is still unresolved. Many theorists believe what we have inherited and our genes, makes us the way we are and how we develop. Other theorists believe it is the way we are brought up and our experiences, that make us the way we are and how we develop.

The nature-nurture debate has been around for decades. It is one of the oldest and most popular topics in the history of psychology asking what makes people who they become and how they behave and develop the way they do. What makes the debate more interesting is that now scientists are asking if personality traits and even sexual orientation can be determined by what is in already there from conception. Bodies are built up of chromosomes which contain genetic information. Many of these are inherited from parents and relatives. The nature side of the debate states the way people are is predominantly from inherited genetics and other biological factors not so much the environmental factors. The genes humans have in their bodies play a huge role to many aspects of who they are and who they become. For example, hair colour, eye colour and height are all predetermined by genes. Unchangeable. This is natures way. The argument stands to decide whether most attributes do stem from nature, genes, or if they can be affected by the environment and the way people are nurtured as they have grown. The nurture side of the argument believes although humans do have the genes and traits with which they are born, most personality traits are being made up of environmental factors. For example, being loved and cared for as children, if parents or carers were positive role models and if those people were taught in ways which provided them with discipline and respect for others. Where nature

If we look at epigenetics it tells us how nature vs nurture interacts cohesively. In chapter three of Discovering Psychology, the Science of The Mind it states that “Epigenetics refers to the field of reversible development of traits by facts that determines how the genes perform.” (John T. Cacioppo and Laura A. Freberg, 2014 p. 73). With that being said, we know that our genes play a role

In nature the individual inherits their genetics from each parent. Nurture is classed as social economic or environmental influences, it is hard to determine whether a person is influenced by their nature or by their nurturing. Adolescence 10-18 years

Nurture vs Nature Reading the memoir Identical Strangers by Elyse Schein, it is easily comprehensible that the debate of nurture vs nature has been around for decades. Nurture is the way a person grew up or was raised, while nature refers to the biological factors in a human being. To test this subject, scientists went as far as experimenting on humans. Even though both nature and nurture play a big role in shaping human development, it is the difference between our genetics and environment that determines our behavior, personality, and overall well being of a person. Nurture plays a huge role in the development of humans.

Nature vs Nurture debate is the representation that society is an organism, but the question is do we inherently possess the knowledge to function as an organism, or are we taught this skill. The debate over Nature vs Nurture is more of a struggle about which theory is the correct theory in my opinion. Social behaviors can be the product of both genetics as well as an influence by our environment.

     Throughout my childhood, I didn't grow up free of environmental influences nor did I develop without being affected by my inherited genetic makeup. I think

Nature versus nurture is a commonly debated topic in the scientific world. For example were all child molesters abused as children themselves or are their genes or other factors to blame for their bad decisions? Genes seem to determine much about children, such as eye color and height, but do they also determine behavior and overall health, or is the environment the children were raised in to blame? For example, when a child is misbehaving, is it the parents responsibility to take the blame for their offspring's behavior due to how they have chosen to raise their son or daughter, or is the child's genetic makeup to blame for their faults? Can a child's environment override the genes a child is born with?

In society, not one person is alike. By saying this, many people believe that they strongly take after their parents. Meaning they think Nature is a big part in their life and why they are who they are. The genes in each cell in us humans determine the different traits that we have, more dominantly on the physical connections like eye color, hair color, ear size, height, and other traits. However, it is still not known whether the more abstract attributes like personality, intelligence, sexual orientation, likes and dislikes are gene-coded in our DNA. The nurture theory has experiments showing a child’s behavior with the environment as to adult behavior. In the Nature Vs Nurture debate, everyone has their own thoughts and ideas on each

Nature vs. nurture debate is one of the oldest arguments in history. Many psychologists have studied the debate, but everyone seems to have a different opinion. “Thousands of people have been investigated

Of course, to every argument there has to be two sides. Some scientists argue that the way we are and act is not necessarily all determined by our genes. Believers of this side think that our behavioral aspects are derived from the environment in which we are brought up in. In the theory of nurture, our behaviors are not instinctive, but are learned throughout our lives. For example, we all laugh and cry at different time and under different circumstances. As humans, we learn from our surroundings and are influenced by our peers and parents. Another example of the role of nurture explaining our behaviors is that fact that we learn our fears and phobias. The key difference is that nurture alters itself from the fact that our biological make up is the only explanation for our behavior.

Nature vs. Nurture is one of the oldest philosophical debates in Psychology. Nature refers to hereditary traits passed down through our genes that influence what we look like and the essence of who we are. Nurture refers to variables in our environment that impact who we become. There are many different points of view in Psychology, on both sides. Just to use two of them as examples; Nativists feel that all or almost all of our characteristics are passed down to us in our genes. Whereas, Empiricists believe that we are born with a blank slate and everything we become is learned behavior, regardless of genes. I feel that our behavior and personalities are based on both nature and nurture.

The way you look and you physical feature all thing that we get from your parents , things like your eyes and hair colors are things that we in……. from our parents . However talents and personality do not come from your mother or father it come from that environment . a place where you grews up has a big affect on how you talk and how you react or respond things around them.The nature and nurture debate is hard to choose if a person development is influenced by the DNA or is it influenced by life experiences and the environment. Both nature and nurture have a big role on how children develop.

Nature and nurture are usually seen as very different things, but they are actually somewhat similar and even integrated. There is a huge debate over which holds more influence over how people develop and whether they behave based on genes or their environment. In Sincero’s article Nature and Nurture Debate she discusses arguments for both sides, saying behavior may be completely in a person’s genes, or it could come from experience and influence. Many people believe “that the criminal acts, tendency to divorce and aggressive behavior causing abuse can be justified by the ‘behavioral genes’” (Sincero). These genes are said to be the reason that people behave as they do and one cannot help their own actions. Other arguments suggest “that genetic influence over abstract traits may exist; however, the environmental factors are the real origins of our behavior. This includes the use of conditioning in order to induce a new behavior to a child, or alter an unlikely behavior being shown by the child” (Sincero). Environment is a key role in determining how a person is developed, even if genes lay the foundation for personality. However, not only are both very important in influencing behavior, but they also incorporate each other, as part of natural instinct is to prosper and grow, which includes nurturing and protecting others. The importance of nature and nurture in the development of a person as well as their importance within each other contribute to many different situations

Nurture refers to experiences in life. Many psychologists believe that the way that you were raised or your environment determines the person that you will become. It is said that if you were raised in a family with great morals and a great background, you are likely to end up the same way. On the other end of the scale, if you were brought up in a poor neighborhood, no moral and no standards, it is said by some psychologist that you are said to likely end up the exact same way. My personal opinion is that we are made up of both nature and nurture. In some individuals I have noticed that they can balance each other out or one could possibly take over the other. I think that as individuals we pick up certain traits and characteristics genetically such as skin and eye color along with our looks from our family. I am definitely my father’s child and if you were to meet any of my sisters on my father’s side you would see this to be true. We all look alike, sound alike, share the same skin tone and