NCAA Football Game Continued? NCAA Football video games were some of the best games of their time. This was the battle ground for college football fans. When the game was discontinued after the 2014 edition, lovers of the game were stunned. In order to continue the game, EA Sports would have to pay the players and the colleges to be able to produce and sell the game. I agree with EA for not continuing the game. I do not believe that they should pay the players who are featured in the game for several reasons. In addition, I feel that the competition between the Madden football game and the NCAA football game would be too great and this would negatively affect EA’s profits. I also believe that EA would be at risk to get sued again by …show more content…
In the article it was stated that “in order to make the game worth buying, EA is going to have to use the players’ likenesses again” (Rovell 2016). Bryan Weidey (2016) said in his article that without the ability to include real players in the products by paying for their rights it's unlikely any developer including EA Sports would take on the massive project of rebuilding a college sports video game. To be able to use their likenesses, EA would have to pay royalties to the players. Unless they use the player’s likenesses, the game would not be near as good as the previous games. The whole point of the game is to use one of your favorite colleges and play with your favorite players. I do not think the players deserve to be paid to be put in this game. Unlike the NFL players, college football players do not get paid to play football. College players are trying to play good enough at the college level to get to the NFL. I believe that if the player is not getting paid to play in real life that he should not be paid to be in a …show more content…
On top of not making as much money off of the game, EA Sports would be in competition with the Madden games. The NCAA Football game would have to be the best edition they have made so far in order to draw gamers in and to be able to even have a chance at competing with the Madden games. Rovell also stated in his article in 2016 that several people think that all people play now is EA’s FIFA game. That would mean even more competition that the NCAA Football game would have. Another factor that EA would have to take into account is that there could be a chance they could be sued again like before. In the article it was stated, “As of the last agreement, around $10 million total went to schools” (Rovell 2016). A lawsuit against EA caused them to have to pay the schools and players because they did not have consent from the players allowing EA to feature them in the game. This could happen again if something is looked over or forgotten in the process of making the game again, which would cost the company an enormous amount of
College athletes were being paid in the 1920’s to play for the NCAA but since then they were classified as “students” so the school or the NCAA did not have to pay them. They spend 43.3 hours on the field which is 3.3 more hours than the typical American work week which should technically classify them as employees instead of “students.” Coaches are being paid from $1 million to $7.5 million a year but the football athletes are getting paid nothing due to the NCAA rule of not receiving any of the money. While college football athletes do not currently get paid, they should be paid for their talents because the NCAA is making money off of them and the student athletes would be more likely to stay in school due to the money they would earn to pay off debts.
Do you think that NCAA players should get paid for playing their sports. NCAA players should be able to get paid for playing in games that generate millions of dollars for universities, they can get seriously injured playing the game, their images are used for other people to make money, and they are not able to get a job because of all the hours put into their sport.
As Forbes' Chris Smith wrote,” Athletic conferences receive millions of dollars in payouts from the NCAA when their teams advance deep into the tournament. Ditto for the coaches of the final squads standing. The NCAA, as a whole, makes $6 billion annually.” But the players themselves don’t see any of that money. The huge amount of money being made off of college sports has raised some questions as to whether these student athletes should be considered “amateurs”, whether they should, and also if they should be paid for their efforts and commitment.to not only the sport but school also. “A group of former players has filed an antitrust lawsuit alleging that student athletes are entitled to some of the money the NCAA makes off of using their names and likenesses on merchandise such as jerseys and video games.”- US
College football players should be paid because they are nationally televised;and the players aren’t allowed to have sponsorships, the players don’t get any health care paid for by the NCAA. TV Channels make a lot of money for televising college football games, from commercials and pay-per view programs on TV. With all the money the NCAA makes from TV programs, the players should get paid, not just the coaches of the teams. College football coaches
Should the NCAA allow college football athletes be shown the money…or not? This is a debatable question facing college sports. College football players generate billions in revenue for the NCAA and intercollegiate athletic departments of their respective universities, yet are only compensated by colleges through athletic scholarships that cover tuition, room and board, and books. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), on one side of the debate are the defenders of amateur passion, asserting that to play for pay would destroy campus sports and a football player should play for the love of the game. The National College
Imagine putting all of your time and energy into your work and being able to see it pay off. Great, right? However, at the end of the day, you are forbidden by law to receive payment for all of your drudgery. This is exactly how NCAA football players feel every day. The NCAA stands for the National Collegiate Athletic Association. This non-profit organization was founded by Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. It is responsible for forming every law that applies to all college athletic sports, in order to protect the student athletes participating. One of these regulations forbids the payment of players. Paying NCAA football players would give them something to fall back on, be fair, help grow earnings for universities, and widen the athletic competition.
The topic of paying college athletes was not brought up by the NCAA, but other organizations. People thought that the college football players should get paid because they work more than the average adult works a week. The NCAA has been trying to tell these people that there are multiple reasons why college athletes should not get paid and most colleges can’t afford this as well. College football
The topic of paying college athletes has been talked about for a few years now. A survey in 2013 shows that about 31% of the general public agree that college players should be played(Martinz, Madisen. “Should College Student-Athletes Be Paid? Both Sides of the Debate. ”CollegeXpress), They argue that these players work really hard while trying to maintain their grades, and are bringing in millions for their universities.
Throughout the years there have been many suits filed against the NCAA for health benefits and if life threatening injuries or even deaths occurred during a game or practice. The NCAA has won every single case against the amateurs so far. They know how to pull strings and what strings to pull to get what they want, when they want. In one particular case, a previous student-athlete with a NCAA scholarship in football was made a promise, to go back home in better condition than when he left. That promise was not kept when he collided with another player and broke his neck. The injury caused him to be paralyzed for the rest of his life, ending his football career instantly. The NCAA terminated his scholarship and claimed that they were not liable for any medical costs. In court the defense that they used to prove that it was not their fault his injury happened was that he was only on the football team for an extra-curricular activity and he was not intending to go to the professional league. That student did not receive any help from the NCAA for payment towards any medical costs from his injury. To possibly avoid many lawsuits in the future the NCAA should pay their student-athletes because this way the students would have money to pay for some
College sports has become extremely popular over the past few years. With the March Madness tournament held in March and the new College Football Playoff held in January, the NCAA has achieved a great deal of attention and high television ratings. Although colleges make tons of money off of their athletes, college athletes receive plenty of compensation. Paying student athletes would cross the line between professionalism and amateurism and would violate the essence of being a student athlete.
A lot of people to this day wonder if student athletes should be paid. This topic has created a lot of controversy among a ton of people. Yes, paying student athletes seems harmless, but if you look beyond the big picture, it could ultimately ruin the NCAA and all college sports for good. UWIRE Text stated, “Getting paid would suggest that college athletes are simply carrying out job responsibilities instead of a recreational activity on game day, which could take away the fun and sanctity of watching the NCAA” (UWIRE Text). Student athletes in college should not be paid to play their respected sports due to the fact that they are already getting paid and that it would make the NCAA organization uneven in the payment of players, the classroom,
Lastly, if colleges aren’t going to pay players to play, they should let them use their talents to bring in money to players and the school. Agreements can be made if both sides would listen to each other. College athletes should be paid because their names bring money to the school and anyone associated with the school and keep athletes who can’t pay for school in school longer. The school and
For year’s people, athletes, college directors, and even the fans have always had different opinions on whether or not that the NCAA should pay the college athletes. Many people think that most of the athletes put in as much time for it to be considered a full time job so that they deserved to be payed, but others think different. Other people think people think college athletes shouldn’t be paid since they are supposed to be students while in school and not employees until they reach the professional level. No matter what people think college sports are watched by millions of people and are entertaining to watch and if the athletes are getting paid or not, it shouldn’t take the entertainment and passion that everyone has for each sport. Many people think that college athletes deserve to be paid with all the time they put in into practices, workouts, and traveling for away games while still going to school, up to 60 hours a week, and maintaining the grades they need to have to be able to play.
One of the biggest issues surrounding college football, is whether or not college football players should get paid or not. The NCAA believes
First, there are countless deaths caused from football across the world. Mainly because of poor tackling or a hard hit to the head. Everyone knows that football is a very dangerous sport and still we play it anyways. A number of injuries people sustain through just one season of football is crazy. I remember when I played I would leave the games barely able to walk. The game is a tough sport that takes a toll on your body. It will cause players to sustain major injuries and sometimes even fatal ones. Knowing the injuries players can get the school systems still do not give the student athletes money. They will get scholarships but not actual money to play this dangerous game. The University of Texas gives