Murder Of Mr. Nesbitt's Guilt In The Book Monster

Adnan Syed is innocent. I believe this because one, everyone says things that don’t make sense or don’t add up. Two, how could Adnan do this if he cared for Hae as much as he says he does? Three, every time it seems like the blame should fall on Adnan, people doubt that he’s not the one to blame. First, Adnan Syed is innocent in my eyes because all of his witnesses say different things and things that don’t add up. For example, almost all of the witnesses said a lot of “he was probably there”, and “from what I can recall”. Next, Adnan cares and wants the best for Hae, so why would he kill her? Adnan stated that he just wanted her to be happy that’s all he cared about, does that sound like a murder to you? Lastly, there’s too much doubt on

Steven Avery's case has been one of the most captivating cases in the nation to hit the Netflix series. So many people have argued whether or not Steven Avery is guilty or innocetnce. I believe Steven Avery is guilty for the murder of Teresa Halbach. The reason I believe this is because Every piece of information in this case leads to none other than Steven Avery. This is why I believe Steven Avery is guilty for making Teresa Halbach a target, finding evidence in Steven Avery's property, and Brendan for being a witness.

In our society, sometimes people make bad decisions. The book Monster is about men who made bad decisions and are on trial for them. One person was the main character in the book Monster his name is Steve Harmon he was accused of robbing a store and murder. In the robbery, Steve was the lookout, but he was not responsible for Mr. Nesbitt’s death.

In the book Monster, written by Walter Dean Myers, a young boy named Steve Harmon was accused of taking part of a crime. In a real life trial called Murder on a Sunday Morning, a young boy named Brenton Butler was also accused of being a part of a crime. The main reason of those false accusations is because of their skin color, the witnesses notice color instead of physical appearance.

The questionable forensic evidence, the untrustworthy witnesses and the insufficient investigation are all reasons why Steven Truscott should never have been charged with the rape and murder of Lynne Harper. Being charged with something you did not commit is something nobody wants to go through. Evidence, witnesses and the investigation portion is very important for a case to run correctly. It took Steven Truscott 42 years to finally get his name cleared. He went through many trials and hearings to finally get the news one day that he was free to go. Most of his life was taken from him that he will never get back. “They finally got it right after all these years. I am so used to fighting. Now we don’t have to fight anymore.”

Steve Harmon is the main character in the book Monster. Steve is on trial for his part in the murder of Mr. Nesbitt. Mr. Harmon struggles throughout this process trying to figure out who he really is. He also attempts to convince himself that he did not do anything wrong. Steve is a seventeen-year-old high school student that loves film class. He uses his knowledge of film to write a movie script based on his time in prison and his trial. The script is named Monster. Steve Harmon is wrongly found innocent in the trial for the murder of Mr. Nesbitt. There is a large stock of evidence that can be used to prove that the jury made a mistake. The young man had knowledge of a crime that resulted in an innocent mans death and he should be punished for it. Steve states in the book that he discussed the robbery with King and Peaches. Steve admits that he had knowledge of the robbery. Steve’s Alibi doesn’t hold much ground either.

Netflix produced a show called Making a Murderer that explains Steven Avery’s life. This show has people thinking on both sides of the spectrum but it is clear he did not have anything to do with either of the cases. He is always found guilty for things he didn’t do. Avery was able to prove the police wrong for sexually assaulting a woman but fell short for the murder of Teresa Halbach. He is not guilty for the murder of Halbach and his defense team is doing everything they can to prove that.

The United States judicial system says that you are innocent until proven guilty. In language arts class we read a book called Monster, by Walter Dean Myers. Monster is about a 16 year old boy named Steve Harmon, and how he had to go on a trial for felony murder. The book is set as if Steve is making a screenplay. At the end of the book Steve is proven innocent, and free to go, but I believe that there was not enough information for Steve to be proven guilty. The jury did not see many parts of the story that readers of the book Monster read, for example, in his journal Steve writes about wanting to be like King, he also has flashbacks to before the crime that show him interacting with other members of the crime, and finally he had a lot of really close people doubting him.

Saying someone is guilty without enough evidence is so absurd. There was once a guy who is proclaimed a guilty by the court without enough evidence or proof. His name is Adnan Syed the fact that the murder case of Hae Min Lee has full of holes and facts don't match up, he was still charged of guilty. There is more evidence that makes sense proving he is innocent than guilty. One big piece of evidence that proves Adnan is innocent is Jay’s story of how events went that day. The woman who narrated the podcast, Sarah Koenig, and one of her fellow producers reenacted the events of that day, except for the murder, according to Jay’s story. They realized that the first part of the day could have happened, such as going to the mall and looking for

The law states that if someone is accused for the murder of another, that person is still innocent until proven guilty. In Adnan Syed's case, there is not enough hard sufficient evidence that could prove that he is guilty for the murder of Hai. The court has just gone off of word of mouth from what the people they put on the stand said in the trials,000000000 but they do not actually have any evidence that proves Adnan truly committed the crime. This is why I believe that he is innocent.

He was accused of murder all because he had scratch marks on his arm in which his neighbor noticed (Forensic Examiner p82). I just feel that a person should have a fair trial and that the evidence be tested correctly. Where there aren’t any mistakes with how the hair and DNA that was tested isn’t falsely compared to the suspect when it matches another or the victim for that matter.

We are gathered here today for the trial of Mr. Creation and Victor Henry Frankenstein. The creation is charging his creator, Victor, with negligence, reckless endangerment resulting in the involuntary manslaughter of William Frankenstein, Henry Clerval, and Elizabeth Lavenza, malpractice, emotional, and physical distress. My client, Mr. Creation, has suffered many times at the hand of his creator, and we are here today to see that justice is served for the cruel actions of Mr. Victor Frankenstein. In the following trial, we will be proving the defendant guilty of all the above charges.

A lot of people wonder if Adnan Syed is guilty or innocent, today as a legal assistant I'm going to tell you one important reason why he is innocent. Adnan is not guilty because there is another potential suspect like Jay. Jay's story that "proves" Adnan's guilt, has changed every interview and testimony. Jay had intimate knowledge of the crime he knew things, like if he knew every single thing that Adnan was thinking about which makes everything looked suspicious. Also Jay's stories don't quite match Adnan's cell records.

“A person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.” In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a 19-year-old is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence were presented, the three that are shaky include the height of the father, the woman who saw from the el train, and the old man who saw the boy running down from the stair. Based on these, the boy is not guilty.

He has done too many good things for me and my family that it just doesn’t seem true. Just because everyone thinks he is guilty, doesn’t mean that he did anything.