preview

Michael Landy Research Paper

Decent Essays

In an endless transfer of energy, we destroy in order to create. Michael Landy’s H.2.N.Y. Self-Destroying Work of Art (2006), currently on exhibit in the Art Gallery of New South Wales, tales an eloquent narrative of cause and effect between a selection of opposing forces. Dichotomies found within the destructive and creative process, linear and circular movement, and bound and unrestricted geometries are explored in this work under the pretext of conceptual refinement, compositional qualities and exhibition technique respectively. Landy’s drawing romanticizes the act of annihilation, with perpetual reference to Jean Tinguely’s Homage to New York (1960), and thus translates misadventure into a catalyst for the foundations of his underlying …show more content…

encompasses an ironic recipe of two ingredients, synthesizing destruction with its counterpart of creation. Michael Landy, a Young British Artist and member of the Royal Academy of Arts in London, is recognized for his extensive practice, which spans from the monumental and epic, to the intricate and meticulous.[2] His investigation into destructive performance can be traced back to his monumental project Break Down (2001) in which he publicly obliterated all his personal belongings in a critical examination of what we value and what we discard, consumerism and waste, and human labour and its empirical worth.[3] Landy’s drawing H.2.N.Y alludes to Jean Tinguely’s inexorable deteriorating machine, constructed in a three week period adjacent to the Museum of Modern Art and subsequently set in motion only to pulsate, tremble and burst into flame in an unsuccessful pursuit of self-destruction.[4] Fourty-seven years after Jean Tinguely’s self-destroying machine combusted in a star-studded social arena, Landy produced whimsical, detailed studies on paper for a reenactment of the machine’s performance.[5] Having discerned a coincidental similarity between his own project and Tinguely’s, Landy initiated an unorthodox artmaking process where he reconstructed the event through the peripheral fragments of people’s memories.[6] Just as the smoldering embers of an abandoned campsite still harness the power to start a forest fire, the contradictory …show more content…

Image photographed by Karen Lin on site visit to the Art Gallery of New South Wales. The successful exhibit of H.2.N.Y engages in a spirited interplay of framed geometries, counterbalanced by the unrestricted, free-form illustrations which spiral around the walls of the John Kaldor Family Collection gallery space. The collection is renowned for its in-depth portrayal of some of the most influential artists of the twentieth and twenty-first century, including Michael Landy.[7] Conceived as an assembly of solo shows, each individual exhibit contributes to a perpetuating dialogue between a diverse range of expressive forms in a cross-section of contemporary attitudes towards artmaking. For this particular installation, Landy digitally tore apart his charcoal drawing Machine to Destroy the Tinguely Museum 2 (2010), a process he described as “cannibalizing [his] own work”.[9] Consequently, he enlarged it to create the fragmented constituents of a large-scale drawing which envelopes and pirouettes throughout the exhibition space, linking together a selection of his own works in the immediate area. Counterbalancing the composition of interior architecture is H.2.N.Y, a drawing seated compliantly within a set frame. This spatial dichotomy plays a fundamental role in the audience’s experience of the artwork, catering to both ends of the heuristic spectrum and pays homage to the intrinsic correlation

Get Access