preview

Malthus Theory On Global Overpopulation

Decent Essays

Even though some say that Malthus’s theory was correct, I believe that Malthus’s theory on global overpopulation was wrong. Malthus’s theory was wrong because he didn't see the future of technology, birth rates or what the global population would look like in the future. However, even though I believe that Malthus's theories weren't correct a few hundred years ago, doesn't mean that they will always be incorrect.
First off, we will look at how birth rates are trending over the globe. With the United States, the birth rates have been declining for the past few years. Looking at the past six years, starting in 2008, the birth rate was 14.18 per 1000 persons. Looking at 2014 the birth rate was 13.42 per 1000 persons. The average number of babies women from 15 to 44 have over their life dropped to a record low last year, to 1.86 babies, well below the 2.1 needed for a stable population. For every 1,000 women ages 15 to 44, there were 62.5 births in 2013, compared with 63 the previous year. As we see here, these numbers are not heading in the right direction, but are not all that bad.
I have also came by the number 2.1 needed for a stable population. I wanted to learn more about that so this is what I found out. Replacement rate fertility requires each woman to replace herself. According to the CIA World Factbook, there are 107 boys born for every 100 girls. Meaning that each 100 women need to have 207 children, on average, in order to produce the 100 girls needed to replace

Get Access