Limited Regulations Of The Fda On Cosmetics Essay

In 1906 the Food and Drug Act was officially created by the president at the time that was Theodore Roosevelt. The job of the FDA is to protect the health of the public and doing so by assuring that human and veterinary drugs are safe and secure along with biological products, medical devices , food supply in the US, cosmetics, and products that have been introduced to radiation. It’s important because they ensure the foods you are consuming can be eaten without getting you sick. They also ensure the medicine you get is not going to cause harm to you. Without the FDA the drugs we get from pharmacies and the food we get from stores would have the possibility of being very unsafe and hurtful. The FDA has created many regulations that products have to go through to be considered FDA approved. Some of those include the safety of the food we consume, products that contain tobacco, dietary supplements, medications from pharmacies, vaccines, and blood

As one of the primary federal consumer-protection laws in existence today, The Federal Food and Drug Act of 1906 was a law that had two primary goals for food and drugs: (a) forbid harmful ingredients and additions and (b) demand labeling of ingredients to inform consumers. According to Janssen (1981), it was hoped that the enactment of this law would eliminate adulterations and poisons sometimes found in foods, sometimes in drugs and often in both. The foundation of food and drug protection came from the development of scientific methods of analysis by the Federal Bureau of Chemistry,

The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938: Sulfonamide tested for flavor and fragrance but not safety, children died and 350 more were poisoned. This act made it so the sale of unsafe drugs could be stopped, that toxic drugs could be seized, and the burden of proof was given to the manufactures to show data of safety experiments.

The first Pure Food and Drug Act was put into action by Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. The act was passed to prevent the manufacture, sale, or transportation of misbranded or harmful food, drugs, medicines, and liquors. Due to this act the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) came to be. The FDA is now responsible for the testing of all foods and drugs for human consumption and the label warnings on them as well.

Barkan, Ilyse D. Industry invites regulation: the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906. American Journal of Public Health January 1985: Vol. 75, No. 1, pp.

The purpose of the Pure Food and Drug Act was to protect the public against contamination of food and from products identified as healthful without scientific support. The muckrakers had successfully heightened public awareness of safety issues develop from careless food preparation procedures and the increasing number of drug addiction from patent medicines, both accidental and conscious. President Theodore Roosevelt began the process by ensuring the passage of the Meat Inspection Act of 1906, which was followed by the Pure Food and Drug Act, passed in 1906 to become effective at the start of 1907. (Us

American scholars had been focus on attention of what factors promoted the advent of Pure Food and Drug Act. Harvey Washington Wiley was one of the American chemist who contributed and known for the leadership in the landmark of Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906(Coppin, 2010). Harvey Washington Wiley and President Theodore Roosevelt discussed cooperation and disagreement over the promotion of this act. However, regardless of the different perspective from scholars, their conclusions are basically the same, that "Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906" is to protect the interests of

Befor the drug and food act people were unaware of what went on in some factoried and what they were consuming,

This act, under the direct administration of the Bureau of Chemistry, forbade the interstate transport of illegal food and drugs, and exposed any responsible parties, that dare to violate the law, to penalty of seizure of the questionable products and/or prosecution. In fact, the foundation of the law relies on the regulation of product labeling rather than pre-market approval. The selling of Drugs, which are defined according to the standards of strength, quality, and purity in the United States Pharmacopoeia and the National Formulary, is denied under any other condition except that the specific variations from the applicable standards were clearly stated on the label. However, there were different standards that defined foods, but the law outlawed the addition of any ingredients that would alternate for the food, hide damage, generate a health danger, or constitute a filthy or decomposed substance. The controversial interpretations of the food provisions in the law engendered many, sometimes prolonged, court battles. In case the manufacturer decided to list the weight or measure of a food, this had to be done accurately. Also, the food or drug label could not be false or misleading in any particular, and the presence and amount of eleven dangerous ingredients, including alcohol, heroin, and cocaine, had to be listed (Nash 276-77).

The first was the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act in 1906. This was a designed more to control the promotion and marketing of bad foods rather than bad drugs. It came as a result of the exposure of the appalling unsanitary conditions in the Chicago Stockyard in a book by Upton Sinclair called The Jungle.

The history of drug use dates back for thousands of years with diverse purposes throughout humanity. According to Levinthal (2012), the drug-taking behavior gained federal awareness in the early 1900s, due to the lack of drug control regulations. Moreover, Levinthal (2012) mentions four major drug control laws which were established, including: (1) The Harrison Narcotic Act 1914, (2) The Marijuana Tax Act 1937, (3) The Boggs Act 1951, and (4) The Controlled Substance Act 1970. The drug control laws formed help regulate importation, manufacture, selling, or distribution of drugs within the United States (Levinthal, 2012).

3.     Because of this incident, the Food and Drug Administration passed the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1938 to protect the public from unsafe cosmetics and resorted to animals for testing dangerous cosmetics.

In 1906, the Pure Food and Drug Act, that was years in the making was finally passed under President Roosevelt. This law reflected a sea change in medicine-- an unprecedented wave of regulations. No longer could drug companies have a secret formula and hide potentially toxic substances such as heroin under their patent. The law required drug companies to specify the ingredients of medications on the label. It also regulated the purity and dosage of substances. Not by mere coincidence was the law passed only about five years after Bayer, a German based drug company began selling the morphine derivative, heroin. Thought to be a safe, non-habit forming alternative to morphine, heroin quickly became the “cure-all drug” that was used to treat

According to, http://www.toxicology.org/gp/fda.asp, the Society of Toxicology website, in 1937 the Massengill pharmaceutical company dispersed Elixir Sulfanilamide. This drug was prescribed generally to anyone who had symptoms of strep throat. Elixir Sulfanilamide contains diethylene glycol, which is a chemical equivalent of antifreeze. There were 107 documented deaths, involving many children, because of the lack in regulations. The Pure Food and Drug Act was deemed to insufficient to protect the public. This tragedy was the critical motivation for the creation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

The Food and Drug Administration has proposed and created several regulations throughout the years. One of them is the regulation to establish a list of qualifying pathogens that may have the potential to propose or cause a great threat. According to the FDA, this proposed rule would implement a provision of the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now of the FDA. This regulation would assist in reassuring the development of new antibacterial and antifungal drugs. Before the development of new drugs, the FDA must take into consideration the effect on public health due to drug- resistant organisms in humans. The purpose of this paper will be to discuss and highlight what this regulation truly means and the issues surrounding it.