Describe what you believe is implied by the term “engagement risk.” What are the key factors likely considered by Deloitte and other audit firms when assessing engagement risk? How, if at all, are auditors’ professional responsibilities affected when a client proposes a higher than normal degree of engagement risk? I believe that the term “engagement risk” implies that inherent client-specific risks face an auditor throughout the course of an audit, thus creating a risk that the auditor will be unable to successfully assess and manage these risks in the performance of the engagement and properly issue an appropriate opinion. The auditor must understand these client-specific risks, which include, but are not limited to, significant …show more content…
(Louwers 583) By not recommending a restatement of the financial statements, Deloitte would be knowingly allowing the public to rely on information that is not accurate. Second, Deloitte should recommend the restatement to ensure that they are exercising due professional care, the lack of which could lead to lawsuit or penalty (which they eventually got). Since its inception, the PCAOB has been criticized by many parties. Summarize the principal complaints that have been directed at the PCAOB. Do you believe this criticism is justified? Explain. What measures could the PCAOB take to improve its effectiveness as a regulatory body? In general, the main criticisms of the PCAOB are that it has not made sufficient it’s regulatory power, it is slow to act in its investigations of enforcement cases, and that it targets enforcement on smaller firms in order to protect the Big 4 firms, which are regarded as “too big to fail.” While I do not disagree with the fact that the PCAOB is slow and has not produced a significant amount of regulation, I do disagree with the criticism of the PCAOB as a regulatory body in general. I feel that certain members of the public desire absolute transparency in financial reporting, but do not understand the economy required to so. It is nearly impossible, not to mention impractical, to breakdown every aspect of a multi-billion dollar corporation to ensure that every transaction is accounted for
The mission of the PCAOB is to oversee audits of public corporations to protect the interests of the investor and ensure the audits are conducted
b. Assess acceptable audit risk as high, medium, or low considering the items you identified in requirement a. (A risky client will be assessed as a low acceptable audit risk.)
The PCAOB is the public accounting oversight board created by the Congress via the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. It appears the PCAOB has laid the groundwork to effectively monitor and review the public accounting
“Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002” mandated a number of reforms to enhance corporate responsibility, enhance financial disclosures and combat corporate and accounting fraud, and created the "Public Company Accounting Oversight Board," also known as the PCAOB, to oversee the activities of the auditing profession” (U.S. Securities and Exchange Comissions).
Employee Engagement is a measurable degree of an employee's positive or negative emotional attachment to their job, colleagues and organisation which profoundly influences their willingness to learn and perform at work. Thus engagement is distinctively different from employee satisfaction, motivation and organisational culture.
The creation of the PCAOB was necessary and will help prevent another accounting scandal which cost investors billions of dollars and a lot of confidence in U.S. businesses. The PCAOB “oversee the audits of public companies in order to protect investors and the public interest by promoting informative, accurate, and independent audit reports. The PCAOB also oversees the audits of brokers and dealers, including compliance reports filed pursuant to federal securities laws, to promote investor protection”. (pcaobus.org)
SUBJECT: Beginning the Audit Report (Engagement letter, Engagement checklist, Outline of timeframes and milestones of the audit)
The audit engagement team’s responsibilities to determine if an engagement is a high-risk or normal-risk engagement are the same. They both use the audit risk model to determine the inherent and control risk to detect if the account contains errors that could be material when combined with errors in other accounts and detection risk that the auditor will not detect material errors. By using the audit risk model, it would help in determining the substantive audit procedures needed for testing. The factors that prompted Sullivan to designate 1997 audit a high-risk engagement are the subjective nature of the earned value method; Paragon’s large unbilled revenues; the aggressive revenue recognition practices advocated by Golden Bear management; severe weaknesses in Paragon’s cost accounting system. These factors should have alerted Sullivan and his subordinates to be particularly cautious.
Dismissing Smith based solely on a poor attitude without providing evidence that she is hurting departmental job performance or other employees could end the company up in court facing a wrongful discharge suit. It is the manager’s responsibility to interpret and enforce a disciplinary process or policy in a fair and consistent manner. Trent needs to start by determining a plan of action, one that balances the business necessities against worker rights and documenting complaints about lack of professionalism, cooperation, and teamwork. Disciplining can be a gray area without clarifying the rules and pre-determining the viable consequences for violations that are reasonable and defendable.
Thank you so much for spending some time to speak to us about your experiences with Deloitte at the case workshop. It was truly a pleasure meeting you, as I enjoyed listening to your advice in regards to the case interview.
At the turn of the 21st century, more fraud and scandals ensued, therefore more actions were required in order to crack down on the issues surrounding financial reporting. The Sarbanes – Oxley Act (SOX) 2002 was established, in order to enforce corporate governance rules for publicly traded companies (Schroeder et al, 2011). The SOX added more constraints on corporations, making executives and managers more accountable for their actions and financial reporting. The SOX also, established the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which holds the responsibility of setting auditing standards and practices. As a result of these actions, there were fewer scandals and unethical behavior; however, they still exist in one form or another.
Material misstatement shall be treated and assessed by the auditors as significant risks. And the auditor shall gather an understanding of the entity’s
In auditing there are “good” engagements and there are “bad” engagements. A good engagement is one where you have a strong working relationship with the client and act as a cohesive unit striving towards a common goal. Whereas an engagement may be bad if client is difficult to work with or if you feel as though they are almost trying to impede your progress. Another aspect is that good clients have all these extra perks that auditors can use and bad clients do not. Justin Truong, a Masters of Science in Accounting student from Cal Poly SLO and future PwC auditor, stated in an interview that “often times the most sought after clients are those with the most extraordinary benefits... they will allow you eat at their cafeteria
Engagement is more than just happiness. It involves commitment and helping others accomplish goals, whether it’s personal or for work. When people are engaged they do everything possible to complete that task, take full responsibility of the projects that is at hand, stay positive, deliver great work, and go above and beyond to make sure that they do great at the goal that was set. Engagement is the most important factor needed of any person for the achievement of any company in order to succeed.
N.P.Rothbard (2001) defined engagement “as a psychological presence with two key mechanism, attention and absorption”.