preview

Lee Siegel's 'Should Literature Be Useful?'

Decent Essays

The argument made by Lee Siegel in “Should Literature Be Useful?” is that fiction has no specific purpose. More specifically, Siegel argues that fiction has a different effect on every person. He writes that every fictional story “unfolds through your imagination in interconnected layers of meaning that lift the heavy weight of unyielding facts from your shoulders.” In other words, he is suggesting that each of the numerous underlying meanings and messages of novels can teach us a lesson about something happening in our lives. He argues that literature’s absence of a specific purpose gives it the potential to reach every person in a different way, and I agree because every novel that I have read has left some sort of unique impact on me based on what was happening in my life while reading the novel. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a novel that holds many lessons, but only some have stayed with …show more content…

Victor Frankenstein spends almost two years in isolation, working to create a living human. When he is finally successful, however, “the beauty of the dream vanishe[s], and breathless horror and disgust fill[s] [his] heart” (Shelley 35). He no longer appreciates his accomplishment of creating life anymore, and decides to shun the creature. Frankenstein begins his endeavor of creating life with the mindset that after he accomplishes his goal he can return to his family, but because his creature feels like an outcast, he takes revenge on Frankenstein by killing his loved ones. Frankenstein eventually comes to the realization that he cannot even assume that the few friends he still had “were safe from the malignity of the fiend” (Shelley 146). Frankenstein went from having lots of loved ones to having none, all because he desired

Get Access