Leadership Style Self-Analysis Essay

An authoritative leader addresses the end but generally gives workers freedom to innovate, experiment and take risks. The authoritative style works best for organizations that are off track, it helps in creating a new course and fresh long-term vision. The affiliative style strives to keep employees happy to create harmony among. The style has a positive effect on communication. People who like one another a lot talk lot. They share ideas, inspirations leading to flexibility, innovation and risk taking. This style should only be employed when trying to build team harmony. The democratic style allows leaders to build consensus through participation. By spending time getting people’s ideas, a leader is able to build trust, respect and commitment. This style works best when a leader is uncertain about best direction however, it does not make sense if employees are not competent. Pacesetting is a leadership style that expects excellence and self-direction. The leader is obsessive about doing things better and faster, and expects the same of everyone around

After completing the leadership quiz, my leadership style is Democratic, also know as a participative leader. About.com Psychology. (n.d.), defined Democratic leaders as a leadership style that is often the most effective because, this leader encourages input from team members during decision making , although the final decision is made by the leader. This is an accurate description of my leadership style. When there is a conflict, the writer often tried to collaborate with the team to find a solution. Although, the writer usually make the final decision, getting input from team members gives the situation a broader perspective. This style often found to be effective because, in order to have goals accomplished, everyone has to work as a team,

Most individuals probably feel as if they know enough about leadership to speak on the subject. In many cases, however, this is not truly the case at all. Leadership is a broad concept, and there are several different styles and approaches to consider when studying the topic. It is important to consider these styles and approaches when evaluating the effectiveness, or lack thereof, of any particular form of leadership. With that in mind, this essay will consider the leadership styles of two leaders who are involved in the current presidential election process. Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, and Gary Johnson, the Libertarian nominee each utilize different leadership styles, though, the two operate within the same professional arena. That said, the two candidates share the same battle of being outsider candidates struggling to gain notoriety and momentum from a portion of the voting population no longer willing to support mainstream political candidates. This essay begins with a theoretical discussion of leadership and then focuses on the two political leaders, comparing and contrasting each one. This will allow for conclusions to be drawn about how they both work within the same public sphere, while employing different styles to earn votes.

my comfort zones in order to get the full experience and immerse myself in the retreat, and showing my vulnerable side. All these experiences allowed me to realize how they help foster a caring, nurturing and team building culture where we can all trust one another and depend on each other to help us through our experiences. Furthermore, I then realized that there are certain characteristics important to becoming a great leader. These are that the individual has established a complete set of core values, can become present and devote 100% of their attention to the task at hand. Has a well rounded set of characteristics addressing; authenticity, vision, integrity, creativity and service. If a leader can poses most of these characteristics they

According to Bethel University (2011) “What is Your Leadership Style?” my behavior is that of the Participative Style. In this case, I share the decision making as a leader and a follower. Moreover, as a leader, my strengths include being open for discussion from other followers with ideas, questions, and concerns. According to Lam, Xu, & Cham (2015), weaknesses can comprise uncertainty and reluctance when it comes to trying to come to a consensus rapidly. Based on the assessment information retrieved, followers have input; however, I ultimately make the decisions accordingly (Bethel University,

According to the University of Kent leadership assessment, my top 2 leadership styles are Participative and Authoritarian. Participative leaders let their team participate in the decision-making process. The team is kept informed and allowed to discuss and propose policy changes. This type of leadership is best used when quality is more important than speed and productivity.

In our daily life, each and everyone has a leadership and management style in managing their life. My leadership and management style is democratic style. Democratic leadership style is when a leader seeks the participation of the team members in planning and decisions making. The leader encourages suggestion and inputs form the team and actively guides the team towards goal attainment (Marquis& Huston, 2015). As a leader, l always encourage opinions from my team when comes to decision making. Team work is my motor. For example, at work l

Both the team leader and the team members have very important roles in ensuring the effectiveness of the team. These teams, while carefully built and very effective in what they do, require constant leadership attention. This perhaps is the most important issue that could affect a high performing team. A weak leader, who is unable to set good examples or enforce good behavior and or performance accountability, could ultimately result in a broad range of team performance issues. A high performing team requires a leader who communicates clear visions and goals, motivates team members, and capitalizes on each individual’s strengths. However leading a project team comes with its own issues. These could include among others: a) dealing with diversity in the group b) ensuring quality project performance c) communicating and managing virtual teams d) setting clear goals and ensuring clear communicating with the team e) resolving conflict within the team f) staying on top of group deadlines and g) keeping team members motivated.

There is a vast number of situations in which certain leadership styles can and cannot be applied. One situation being a leader who is surrounded by co-workers who are of equal knowledge or even greater knowledge. This situation would be perfect for a style where the leader works together with those he or she is surrounded by to come up with the best possible ideas or products. This style would allow for full utilization of each educated mind in the group including the leader. It would not be so perfect for a style where the leader makes all the decisions, meaning he or she tells every person around him or her what to do. Choosing the not so perfect leadership would affect the

This report is attempting to delve into the systemic differences autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire styles of leadership has on an individual, class, department or institution. As a nursing student, I believe it is important to understand the distinct differences inherent to each style as well as the benefits and disadvantages associated with the various styles of leadership.

Generally, leadership is the art or process of influencing followers and subordinates to achieve the organizational goals. It helps an individuals or a group to identify its goals and assists in achieving the stated goals. Because of importance of leadership all kinds of group action, there are considerable number of researches and theories on leadership and many kinds of leadership styles like Greatman theory, power influence, Trait approach, Behavioral, Situational or Contingency approaches; Below, the Early Behavior Theory of leadership is being described.

After taking the “leadership style” questionnaire, I discovered that my result was Steward. According to Murphy (2016),”Stewards are the rocks of organizations. They’re dependable, loyal and helpful, and they provide a stabilizing and calming force for their employees”. When working for someone that has the leadership style of a steward, you get the chance to work for a well put together team. Often stewards have little individual success and have more team success. Some of the most famous people with the leadership style of a steward were George Washington or Mother Teresa. When in the work place, resolving a conflict can be tough for anyone to handle. Stewards value rules and cooperation which means they want everyone to work together as a team and if something goes wrong they want the whole team to jump in and figure out how to solve the conflict. According to Murphy, (2016),” They believe that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, and they move only as fast as the whole chain will allow”. Different leadership styles can sometimes be confusing for people to understand. With different styles merging together to form a team, leaders have to learn how to treat everyone and their needs. According to Van Wart (2013), “A common perspective in such books is to define leadership by one important aspect, such as the ability to influence others, the ability to change organizations, the

Over-all we had very little difference in our leadership styles. We were all very comfortable encouraging participative management (Thompson, L, 2014) and as a group spending time listening to differing opinions, options and ideas, and considering the pros and cons before making decisions based on the information as presented. We were also all very task-oriented as we were focused on the process of getting whatever project we were currently working on completed. (Thompson, L, 2014) I believe

The first leadership style that I chose is the Team Leadership. I think that team leadership is a great style to use for management because everything is stronger when it is pulled together. Strong team leaders can motivate and guide your business teams so they complete tasks and make decisions effectively. Whether the team chooses its leader or you appoint one, no single leadership approach guarantees success. A team that does well with a strong leader may fail under the guidance of someone with a less effective leadership style( http://smallbusiness.chron.com/pros-cons-team-leadership-styles-62320.html ). This is like the example of Navy Seal B.U.D.S. training. The Seal’s are broken down into different team for small boats based on size.

Most companies and organizations have members of their senior executives that take on more than their role as an executive but are also the organizational leader for the company. They are the type of person that works to mold the company into the image that they want for it by being a role model for the behaviors and characteristics that will help achieve organizational goals. Leadership styles are different, and many of the best leaders have their own unique style that they use to inspire others to do their best in whatever capacity the company needs them in. Not all managers or executives can be seen as leaders, and some senior executives may have a leadership style that actually has a negative impact on the company as a whole, but usually in order for the company to be profitable and excel, this type of leadership should not be able to last long or should be balanced by other better leaders within the company.