Killing Kennedy Thesis

However Castro found out about the plot, apparently through one of the Mafia bosses who was a Cuban sympathizer, Carlos Trafficante, and redirected it back at Kennedy. Another one of the mafia bosses also wanted to get back at Kennedy. Kennedy had won the presidential election with the mafia's help, and still his brother Robert, Attorney General at the time, was publicly prosecuting these same bosses as an effort to put down organized crime. It is believed that Trafficante redirected the Cuban exiles to accompany Oswald in Dallas. The third is the amount of government cover-ups that arose from the assassination. One year earlier Kennedy had made a secret pack with Russia that he would not interfere with the Cuban government. But Kennedy broke this pack by plotting to assassinate Castro. It was believed that if Castro was assassinated then Russia would have retaliated with nuclear weapons. Therefore Kennedy had to be eliminated so that this would not have happened. His death virtually eliminated the threat of Soviet retaliation against the U.S. for his plot to remove Castro using Mafia resources. The murder of Oswald by Jack Ruby plays into this theory that the government was somehow involved. Why would Jack Ruby kill Oswald? I believe that Ruby killed Oswald so that he would not leak to the public that the assassination was a conspiracy. How would the American people take it? Our president was killed by our own

As Kennedy was a young boy, we learn that he feels a sense of being alone, and a deficiency in seeing the contrast between him and his “superior” brothers, John and Joseph Jr.. We see Robert grow not only as a powerful leader of his own, but a person.

Over the past week, I have been indulged in a book over one of the most approved presidents of all time. The book, Killing Kennedy, was written by Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard. The book was published on October 2, 2012 and was later adapted into a film in 2013. The book consist of the history that leads up to the brutal assassination of John F. Kennedy. As well as, detailing the life of Lee Harvey Oswald prior to that fateful day. It also details how those gunshots changed a nation and ultimately brought an end to “camelot”.

John F. Kennedy is one of the most widely respected presidents in American history, with a plethora of books and movies about him. One such book, probably the most popular, is Killing Kennedy by Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard. Killing Kennedy is a novel describing the life and presidential term of John Kennedy and his family while in office. The book also follows the brief history of Lee Harvey Oswald, the man who assassinated JFK, describing his past and the actions that could have prompted him to become an assassin. O’Reilly and Dugard have as unbiased a view as they can possibly get, telling the reader the whole truth about John F. Kennedy, good or bad. The reader gets the whole view of JFK, instead of the sugarcoated image the media has presented of him and his term as president. They portray JFK as the man he is. He was not a good husband, as unfaithful as he was. John F. Kennedy was a great president, there’s no doubt about that. But as a man, he is ruled by his libido, and controlled by his bodily urges.

Some researchers of the JFK assassination, including Walter Williams, a researcher of Vatican conspiracy, argue that the speech “set him up for murder” and that “he outlined the exact methodology of […] when he spoke of the global conspiracy and its operation.” (Pathfinder, 2017) Moreover, others such as Matt Prather, blogger of all things psychology and conspiracy, argue in his analysis that “the network of individual people in our shadow government found Kennedy to be too much of a problem for more reasons than just the Bay of Pigs fiasco” although “that fiasco have been one large factor in his assassination.” (Prather, n.d.) While these arguments are merely just opinions, it would not be impossible to believe that the controversial speech may relate to John F. Kennedy’s bad fortune of

When one hears the name Kennedy, what comes to mind? Many families have multiple icons in the political scene; the Kennedys are no exception. Some think of John F. Kennedy and his assassination. Others think of Jacqueline Kennedy and her elegance, style, and grace. Still others think of Bobby, Rose, or Caroline. Others think of yet another Kennedy, Ted Kennedy and the car crash that wrecked his career on Chappaquiddick Island. Kennedy’s response to the accident ruined his chances of ever becoming president and raised questions about the accident across the nation. If handled properly, the Chappaquiddick incident would not have become a national ordeal. Instead, Kennedy’s irresponsibility and drunkenness led to the incident on Chappaquiddick

Even though John F. Kennedy was well known as a man passionate about the United States, his family and friends recall the humanistic moments of Kennedy’s life, both of which are demonstrated repeatedly by the sources. One of the sources is Kennedys inauguration speech which showed is passion towards the United States and the feelings it evokes in the audience made it an important moment in history, the proud tone that Kennedy continues all the way through the speech also helps evokes emotion in the audience. Article two was a news article by Eleanor Cliff titled “50 years” that shows the memories from Kennedy’s family and friends 50 years later, the memories create a very nostalgic tone while also showing Kennedy passion and the importance of his inauguration at the same time. The photo of inauguration is comparable to the speech in a way that the photo shows the passion and the importance of the moment and the tone is dignified but also proud like the speech.

On the night of April 4 1968, people gathered to listen to the wise words of Robert F. Kennedy. What many thought was going to be a political speech soon took a twist, and the news of Martin Luther King’s assassination was announced and out to the public. Gasps and tears quickly erupted while everyone was gathered around Robert Kennedy’s pickup truck as he stood high above all trying to bring hope and comfort to those who lost someone that fought for their equality, rights and freedom. Kennedy's speech was powerful and successful because of the way he showed empathy to the crowed. He related the tragic scenario to his own life bringing comfort to the many broken hearted and showed both sides of the situation using contrasting forms. Lastly, Kennedy’s speech consisted of repetition with the use of anaphora.

Prior to John F. Kennedy’s inauguration was, of course, the election of 1960, in which Kennedy went face to face with Richard Nixon on issues such as, the Cold War, Kennedy’s religious beliefs, and the display of each’s competence. In Kennedy’s inaugural address, he not only alludes, but also addresses to the Cold War, and makes mention of his future plans and Roman Catholic religious beliefs; and, he does so through use of allusions and anaphoras. Through the use of allusions and anaphoras, Kennedy effectively achieves his purpose of fulfilling citizen’s expectations, addressing the Cold War, and stating the United States’s future plans to his audience, the United States of America and other nations, through emphasis and rhetorical appeals towards pathos and ethos.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy represented the United States' pride, courage, perseverance, patriotism, and honor. He was able to incase the true persona of every proud American. Overall, the people loved President Kennedy. He represented a new generation of thought in the United States' society and world relationships. He exuded personal elegance in his decisions. The advantage of his oratory provided a voice of poise to the American nation. Lacking in Kennedy's life was only length. John F. Kennedy's legacy cannot be explained within one sentence or paragraph. Only in his own captivating words can his persona be explained. His style of writing captivated the nation. By using various rhetorical devices he enabled the public to feel emotional connected

The authors Dugard & Reilly make the point that 8 percent of Americans actually have this belief that Lee Harvey Oswald is the man that had something to do with the death of Abraham Lincoln. However, the authors in this book want the reader to know that is considered to be one explanation for "Killing Kennedy," which happens to be the current book written by authors Bill O'Reilly and Martin Dugard. They clearly wanted to turn a presidential murder into a human awareness story. This type of intense dramatic is selling like hot cakes for a good reason. The authors made sure that Killing Kennedy: The End of Camelot was effective. The authors that wrote this book wanted to make sure that they came across as obvious and clear, not being loaded with an overload of pesky footnotes. However, what they do for the reader is favor facts and the more mathematical the better it is for the readers because they are thorough about everything. The authors in the book want the readers to know as much details as possible. The author's account of the killing of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas talks about his private life and other gory details that have never been talked about in any other book that was written about John F Kennedy. With that said, this paper will give the author's review about what they want the readers to know.

In the book Killing Kennedy O’Reilly and Dugard’s writing style did not lead to glossing over complex details. The whole presidency of John F. Kennedy’s time in office was complex, as well as interesting, and the writers included what they included what they deemed the most important events of his career as President of the United States. To many readers, everything in the book, complex or simple, was interesting from the first story when JFK saved his crew from the PT-109 (O’Reilly & Dugard 31) to the infamous and low-key assassination attempt on General Walker’s life by Lee Harvey Oswald (O’Reilly & Dugard 159). The two authors did a very good job explaining the high points and low points of JFK’s presidency with their style. For example, the two authors explained JFK’s issue with an apparent addiction to sex and constant expression of polygamy, yet never caused the reader to think

Compared to Kennedy’s speech, Eleanor Clift’s, “ Inside Kennedy’s Inauguration, 50 Years On,” utilizes a journalistic approach while still appealing to ethos and pathos to achieve her purpose. Clift establishes her credibility through the use of many direct quotes within her article rather than establishing shared values like within Kennedy’s speech. The article is structured so that each paragraph of the article is the recollection of a different person who attended; a different perspective of the inauguration is discussed each time in chronological order rather than the use of parallelism and climax. At the same time, Clift appeals to pathos, similar to Kennedy, but instead uses anecdotes rather than figurative language. An example of which is seen in the quote, “We forget, looking back on it, how powerful the anti-catholic was,” which states the difficulty Kennedy faced in the election due to his affiliation with Catholicism. The quote is then followed up further in the text with the quote, “We had to win in West Virginia to prove that a Catholic could win because there were so few Catholics there, only 1 or 2 percent.” A feeling of inspiration and respect toward Kennedy is created similar to the feelings patriotism stirred during his inauguration speech. Clift establishes her article in a different

Robert Kennedy is a figure that many people are not aware of his history. David Halberstam did a great job by describing Robert Kennedy’s events that generate many interpretations. David illustrated Robert’s ambitions and his vision as a candidate for the presidency. David as a journalist, he portrayed Robert’s politician’s life, as a regular politician who was not the person the media and society praised. Then, The Unfinished Odyssey of Robert Kennedy’s book, we can interpret David’s writing as a call for our admiration toward Robert Kennedy.

Dallek, R. (2003). An unfinished life: John F. Kennedy, 1917-1963. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.