Executive Summary
An analysis of the gradual growth and expansion obstacles of Fluss Washer and Dryer, after Fluss AG (Swiss parent company) earned profits of $15 billion in the fiscal year 2010.
Following the meeting of the Global Executive Committee on 1st February 2011, the report summarises the issues, analyses causes and effects and provides recommendations on resolving the problems to focus on business development in the fiscal year 2011.
The report concentrates on three issues affecting the Global Executive Committee of Fluss Washer and Dryer; the organisational structure hindering growth, leadership efficiency and motivation of employees. The analysis covers centralisation vs decentralisation of the organisational structure
…show more content…
Although, participation and debate seem to be encouraged at FWD through regional insights and inputs from each RD’s taken on a quarterly basis at GEC meetings and further during one-to-one sessions with Mr. Linden during his travel from one region to another. The final decisions at FWD are not up for discussion and seem to be an imposition that has to be accepted at meetings, which can create disagreement or reluctance in synchronisation of organisational goals and strategy globally.
The organisation communicates one way, through a top to bottom method of decision-making. This is suitable in organisations with specific tasks and monotonous work, such as the military, not when global sales growth and gaining a competitive edge is the expected goal of an organisation with the financial motivation of bonuses being linked to that growth. The practice of telling the Regional Director’s how to do their job seems counter productive to having them in that position. It restricts them from applying their expertise and knowledge of their region through innovation in order to achieve the desired growth.
Empowerment is an important tool for progression and FWD needs to exercise it often when expecting employees to work together towards a global objective. Empowerment can be defined as providing employees the chance to exercise autonomy in making decisions (Vogt, 1997), which is rarely implemented at FWD.
Nauman et al (2010) carried out an experiment to test the
Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2013). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Retrieved from
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Organizational behavior (16th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Note: Refer to Chapter 3)
Buchanan, A. H. (2001). Organizational Behaviour:An Introductory Text (4 ed.). (F. T. Hall, Ed.) Pearson Education.
Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2010). Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. American Psychologist, 65 (3), 157-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018806
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational Behavior (14th Edition). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
In many ways, empowerment embodies principles effective managers and leaders have practiced for years. Two new driving forces in business, increased diversity and high-speed change, magnify the need for empowerment. Empowering people is now indispensable for effective personal productivity and maximum team success.
Capital Power is an independent power producer, based in Edmonton, Alberta, but with operations across North America. It has an aggressive growth strategy with the goal of tripling its
Empowerment is an issue that is imperative to the change process. We touched on the idea of empowerment while exploring power, and politics in the workplace. Empowerment is important in regards to The Heart Of
Employee empowerment is defined as giving employees a degree of autonomy and responsibility for decision-making. The benefits are
References:Huczynski, A. A. and Buchanan, D. A. (2007) Organizational behaviour: An introductory text. 6th ed., Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
All internal stakeholders want to be part of this development and are motivated to make it work
This paper will analyze what empowerment and power are and how they affect the author of this paper. I work at AvisBudget (ABG) and will look at the different levels of power and empowerment at work. Now to explore the five levels of power.
Employee empowerment can be described as giving employees' accountability and ability to make choices about their work without managerial authorization. Good managers are expected to
When one of these divisions is planning to do something, an advertising campaign for example, the division has to communicate with their superiors to get approval. Since the company’s hierarchy is so tall, communication has to travel back to corporate headquarters in the U.S, where the Executive Committee has the final decision making power for activities the divisions have proposed. Below is an organizational chart of the company.
In many companies, operational employees also need information to handle tasks and make decisions that were assigned to supervisors. This trend, called empowerment, gives employees more