Jean Paul Sartre No Exit Essay

In modern day France, Julia Jarmond experiences and watches as dehumanization occurs at the hands of her husband and his family. Her husband, Bertrand, dehumanizes Julia by objectifying her. In the course of the novel, Julia becomes pregnant. Although Julia is ecstatic about this after having multiple miscarriages, Bertrand does not want the responsibility of another child. He gives Julia a harsh ultimatum: get an abortion or get a divorce. Bertrand controls and manipulates Julia, treating her like his property rather

The next day, Aubrie bumps into BAILEY, a bully who is picking on a black girl because of her large lips. Bailey pulls out a knife on the black girl and Aubrie runs away, refusing to help. At her house, she finds a package of knives on her front steps – but there’s no return address. Aubrie’s friends want to hang out with her, but she blows them off to sneak into Nick’s house to try and find evidence on Luster. While she is in the garage, Carolyn storms in and slams the door shut, not noticing Aubrie. Aubrie hides

Further, when Blais describes Louise and Lanz as “ill-fated as the other”, a clear element of foreshadowing of the suffering and resent they will develop for one another is firmly established. This foreshadowing is realized later in the novel as Louise and Lanz have been together for a fair increment of canonical time. Their relationship, though lacking in substance, has been quite stable. However, in a scene where Lanz is sleeping, Louise enters the room, only to see her husband fully dressed in all his elegance. Louise saw “Lanz, whose nails were always manicured and whose shoes were always polished, had fallen asleep fully dressed, in all his offensive perfection. Confronted with this, her own image, Louise squirmed in disgust.” (Blais 54) The resent that was foreshadowed early in the novella is completely realized. As Blaise uses Louise’s character realization that her husband 's image and her own image disgust her, she expertly suggests a key theme. Blais enhances on one of Mad Shadows’ fundamental concepts; the fact that love based in superficiality and false notions of love is doomed to fail, and will only lead to suffering and pain.

Even though she writes this in the book due to peer pressure, she realizes that her actions are wrong and her superego makes her feel bad for behaving in this manner.

Sarah and Julia both encounter turning a blind eye to conflict, even though Julia turns a blind eye to her husband and his actions while Sarah is mesmerized by the people of France choosing to pretend nothing is happening to the Jews. While Julia is waiting to tell Bertrand about expecting another child, Julia ponders about the past. “There was going to be a new baby. Amelie could not fight against that. I smiled, a little bitterly. Closing my eyes. Wasn’t that the typical French attitude, closing your eyes on your husband’s wanderings?” (de Rosnay 102) Julia encounters the realization that she has closed her eye on her husband being unfaithful. Julia reflects on how she could let that happen, how she could let Bertrand manipulate her. Now Julia finds herself in a clinic with the life altering decision of getting another abortion to ultimately please her husband. “I was carrying the baby he did not want. My last chance to be a mother. I kept thinking of what Charla had said: This is your child, too. For years, I had longed to give Bertrand another child. To prove myself. To be that perfect wife the Tezacs approved of… But now I realized I wanted this child for myself. My baby. My last child.” (de Rosnay 167) While trying to live up to the perfect wife in the Tezacs family,

Anne is a rude protagonist that speech is reflected by the tone of the story. The tone is explained by using insults against a character in the story. She keeps the arrogance that she had when she lived a normal life as a teen. But now it is reflected on her pregnant self. The selfish remark about her shows a harsh mean tone that is undeserving. With a simple sentence like that the reader understand what the character and the author feel. The tone complements the the protagonist’s ideas by letting them “shine”. Next, Anne jokingly messes with the other characters that are pregnant. Anne state “:I think someone should gag that Nancy and push her off a roof”(37). Unsurprisingly, the other girls do not take it as a joke. They are all insecure about themselves already about being pregnant. They have discussed committing suicide by many means. They even state that they want to throw themselves off a roof at a group meeting. In torment, Anne says that instead of committing yourselves, try killing someone else and their baby. This tone is unbearably dark and it shows the fact that the author has some past

Her pregnancy dominates her thoughts as she only thinks about herself and she is unable to mourn her loss. Darl knows her secret, and she hates him for knowing. She imagines killing Darl: “I rose and took the knife from the streaming fish still hissing and I killed Darl” (121). This imagining emphasizes how she can only focus on her current situation, instead of thinking about her mother. When she makes it to the drugstore, the clerk, MacGowan, describes Dewey Dell: “One of them black eyed ones that look like she’d as soon put a knife in you as not if you two-timed her” (242). After all the pain the pregnancy caused her, her interactions with manipulative men (such as with the drugstore clerk, her family and with her baby’s father), have made her distrust men and look menacing to strangers. The heartache she feels from her overwhelming stress causes her to primarily stay in the anger stage throughout the book, causing her to turn on others.

Garcin is put in a situation where he is begging, banging on the door to leave when the door does open he doesn’t leave. He really wanted to leave but, when faced with the option to leave he stays and starts laughing right after. Inez and Estelle are torturing Garcin which in ironic because, when Inez and Estelle come in they ask Garcin if he is there torturer. They are all in there because of their actions on earth which can’t be un done. Garcin is so obsessed with proving Inez that he is not a coward that he blocks out the trail to freedom.

Yesterday, I enrolled for class. Now this decision was definite as I couldn’t go back and not enrol. However, the actual action of me actually attending was completely my choice; a conscious decision. Although it was compulsory to attend, nothing given could determine the outcome. John Paul Sartre an eminent existentialist, would argue that just because I made a commitment didn't necessarily mean I needed to follow through with it. Enrolling was part of the facticity of the in-itself. I had only made the decision, I had to follow through with an action. Sartre would contend that by forcing myself to attend if I didn’t want to would be trying to escape from my freedom. Sartre, stated that the basic principle of existentialism was existence precedes essence for human beings. In his essay, Existentialism is Humanism, Sartre attempts to answer the accusations. Essentially, he rejects the notion of any innate human nature; implying that because our essence comes to be after our existence, we are free to choose and live our lives accordingly. This essay will discuss Sartre’s explanation of the expression and the related implications.

Evelines situation becomes an inner battle between the ideas of leaving and staying, all of the thoughts she have sadly become a reality, so many ideas of better places, better times and an overall better life. Eveline is tired: “She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue. Her head was leaned against the window curtains and in her nostrils was the odor

When he returns home to Algiers, Meursault carries on with life as normal. Over dinner one evening, his neighbor Raymond tells of his desire to punish his mistress for infidelity, and asks Meursault to write a letter to the mistress for him. Meursault agrees, saying "I tried my best to please Raymond because I didn’t have any reason not to please him" (32). While Raymond is a man of questionable morals, he acts with purpose. Meursault, on the other hand, acts with mostly passive indifference, doing things simply because he doesn’t have a reason not to do them.

653. This is the same mindset that Sartre applies to the anti-Semite- the refusal to consider the complexity of the world in favor of a system that provides easy answers to all life’s questions. Only, unlike the anti-Semite, the woman is turning her hatred inward; does she hate herself because she fears freedom or because she feels she is not worthy of it? De Beauvoir seems to believe that fear is the primary cause for this willing dependency. She cites the psychoanalytic view that women’s obsession with love does not comes from a desire for men at all, but from a desire to return to the secure dependency of childhood. This explains the lifelong refuge some women take in infantile (“cute”) behavior and appearance, but psychoanalytic explanations for human behavior have proven to be far less than perfect, and a woman’s self-worth (or, in this case, lack thereof) has far more complex roots than a Freudian theorem.

Jean Sartre uses elements of existentialism in No exit to function as a metaphor for the hellish impact of war. Sartre employs imagery, allusion, and imprisonment in order to express the tragedies and complexities of living under Nazi occupation.

When he realizes she provides Eilert with the medium for his suicide, he blackmails her into becoming his mistress in exchange for protection from scandal.

With each letter in Les Liaisons dangereuses, Choderlos de Laclos advances a great many games of chess being played simultaneously. In each, the pieces—women of the eighteenth-century Parisian aristocracy—are tossed about mercilessly but with great precision on the part of the author. One is a pawn: a convent girl pulled out of a world of simplicity and offered as an entree to a public impossible to sate; another is a queen: a calculating monument to debauchery with fissures from a struggle with true love. By examining their similarities and differences, Laclos explores women’s constitutions in a world that promises ruin for even the most formidable among them. Presenting the reader glimpses of femininity from a young innocent’s daunting debut to a faithful woman’s conflicted quest for heavenly virtue to another’s ruthless pursuit of vengeance and earthly pleasures, he insinuates the harrowing journey undertaken by every girl as she is forced to make a name for herself as a woman amongst the tumult of a community that machinates at every turn her downfall at the hands of the opposite sex. In his careful presentation of the novel’s female characters, Laclos condemns this unrelenting subjugation of women by making clear that every woman’s fate in such a society is a definitive and resounding checkmate.