Is Knight Argument For The Existence Of Social-Based Knowledge?

| The study of knowledge: What constitutes knowledge, the nature of knowledge, and whether knowledge is possible

* There are three (3) schools of thought regarding risk. The first considers the positive and negative aspects of risk, but sees them as separate. The second group believes that there are benefits from treating threats and opportunities together, while the third school does not label uncertainties, but addresses uncertainty as part of “doing the job.” Argue the value of having a risk strategy despite the cost associated with it. Include an example to support

There are two different types of knowledge people have: common knowledge that we just accept and knowledge that is obtained through direct observation and personal experience. However most of what we know can’t be learned through experience but social structure allows us to believe what others tell us, as he states, “The basis of knowledge is agreement.” To achieve an agreement, both science and sociology require three major things: theory, data collection, and data analysis. However in science, the data must make sense and doesn’t contradict the actual observation. Social research looks for patterns of regularity in social life of

Gun control is a major topic in today’s society and it is broken into many subcategories that all have different arguments and views. A few examples are The Second Amendment is not an unlimited right to own guns, more gun control laws would reduce gun deaths and more gun control leads to fewer suicides in the United States. The gun control category I am focusing on in this essay is, should teachers and students be able to carry firearms on a college campus. I chose this since I am currently attending college and this could have an effect directly on me or ASU. The idea of teachers and staff being able to carry firearms on a college campus has come up many times in the media recently due to the rise in mass shootings. Many states are now looking at this problem and voting on it. This topic is always heavily debated due to the many different sides and varying beliefs on gun control and safety. The NRA (National Rifle Association) has a heavy influence on the united states and who should be allowed gun and what legislation is passed. The gun control topic of firearms on a college campus has become politicalized and is commonly drawn into political debates and has become a political tool for winning elections. Some states have already voted and taken action on this new idea and have allowed staff to carry guns on campuses and in cars parked and locked in secure parking lots. Another major idea that is constantly brought up with campus carry and firearms on campuses

The Italian Renaissance that took place in the 1400’s was a time of discovery and innovation. New ways of painting and different forms of art were created. The middle ages consisted of only religious paintings; while as the Renaissance had paintings of elegance and beauty. Arguably, one of the most important forms of art discovered was secularism, and the man who influenced it among the people was Sandro Botticelli. Secularism is a theme that is seen through art and has nothing to do with religion.

The similarities of Griffin and Dr. Kemp are shorter than their differences so we begin with the notoriety they both seek as scientists. Dr. Kemp seeks to be a member of the Royal Society, the oldest national scientific society in the world and once the leading national organization for the promotion of scientific research, as a 'speculative philosopher ' as the author deems in chapter 15 with his study of 'remote speculation of social conditions of the future '. Griffin too seeks

When people take risks they are willing to put themselves into situations that they can both lose or gain something valuable. The object can be both tangible and tangible. Uncertainty is when a person is unsure about a situation. An example of uncertainty is when a person is in doubt and not sure how to handle the situation. Risk and uncertainty are separate, but they are typically found within the same situation (McConnell, 2015).

Social Reality is a theory of knowledge that examines the development of jointly constructed understandings of the world. It assumes that understanding, significance and meaning are developed not separately within the individual, but in coordination with other human beings. The elements most important to the theory are the assumption that human beings rationalize their experience by creating a model of the social world and how it functions and, that language is the most essential system through which humans construct reality. Without language we cannot understand the meaning of what we see; we cannot recognize the context in which the meaning of what we see is shared and constructed. Intentionality is based on the recognition that one knows what one sees or that one understands the meaning of what one sees. This means, again, intentionality is based on language, and more generally, the use of symbols.Social reality is all about a the group aspect of ethics.

Risk can be defined as “The possibility of a (negative) event occurring”. Risk and uncertainty go hand in hand. When you are certain about something that you do then there is less or no risk involved. There is more risk when there is uncertainty about a particular outcome and you still go for it.

However, as Gregory (2002) argues, it should be noted that such knowledge, be it implicit or explicit, is shared by the members of a social group “by way of their discourses”; and therefore “the pattern of their knowledge is observable and so describable, and this caters too for what is pertinent about an individual’s knowledge” (Gregory, 2002, p. 16).

The claim “Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organization of facts,” has many flaws in its implications. All of the knowledge that we gain as ToK knowers cannot be considered infallible fact. The term “fact” implies that the statement or claim can be reinforced with substantial evidence and can be proven, and we have learned that almost any information can be considered knowledge, no matter how subjective or specific the information is. Given that an individual is defined by having a specific and unique way of thinking and perceiving the world, most of the knowledge gained in several different Areas of Knowledge are heavily dependent on the perspectives of the individuals under examination. Both the Areas of Knowledge of Ethics and Human Sciences have many ambiguities when it comes to organizing and legitimizing this data. This leads the knower to ask, “What makes information factual in terms of ToK knowledge?” It can be proven through Ethics and Human Sciences that knowledge is not the systematic organization of facts, but the systematic organization of collective data to show trends and patterns.

Objectivity in Social Research is the hunt for an objective i.e. truth. The opinion that the philosophy of science, comprising economics is under accumulative pressure curtailing from the post-positivist assessment of science; conversely the revolution in research behaviour as a result of its marketization calls for an amplification of the content and positioning of this philosophy.

Interpretivists also argue that the statistics and data used by positivists to discover their ‘laws of society’ might be invalid, because of the way they are gathered.

Knowledge is defined to be facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education. There are two categories that fall under knowledge; personal knowledge and shared knowledge. Shared knowledge refers to what “we know because.” It can also be defined as communicated and constructed knowledge; within culture, social norms, and semiotics. Personal knowledge refers to “I know because.” An expanded definition of personal knowledge refers to personal experiences, values, and perceptions. Shared knowledge changes and evolves over time because of methods that are continuously shared. It is assembled by a group of people. Personal knowledge, on the other hand, depends crucially on the experiences of a particular individual. It is gained

Positivism can be referred to as a hypothetical and methodological approach in History. It is also believed by positivists that human actions are produced by biological, psychological or social factors as well as forces. A positivist’s outlook of the world is quite different as science was seen as a means of getting the truth, to comprehend the world sufficiently so that we might foresee and control it. The world as