The United States of America is a very diverse country. It is filled with people with different races such as African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, Native Americans, India, England, and so much more cultures as well. Although the country may be diverse as the nation as a whole, it is not diverse within the country. David Brooks argues that the country is diverse in terms of social and personal lives. He also stated that “the United States might be a diverse nation when considered as a whole, but block by block and institution it is a relatively homogeneous nation” in which he may state that this is true he argues that “we are finding places where we are comfortable and where we feel we can flourish. But the choices we make toward that end lead to the very opposite of …show more content…
Brooks support his argument by giving examples of how the U.S is a homogeneous nation. One example would be when he declares how in Washington, D.C., Democratic lawyers seem to result in living in suburban Maryland and Republican lawyers seem to live in suburban Virginia. He stated by saying if you asked a Democratic lawyer to move from Maryland to Virginia, she would look at you “as if you had just asked her to buy a pickup truck with a gun rack and to shoe chewing tobacco in her kid’s mouth.” Another example he wrote was when he explained how Boulder, Colorado once became known for radical mountain bikers
How is the United States so diverse? Well, through immigration, the United States has acquired different races of people. Just like many other immigrants, Julia Alvarez came to the United States. Not by choice but by force due to the dictatorship in her home country. At the beginning of the text, you can see that the author has no issues with her place of origin.
Using date from the analysis of the 2000 census data to support his claim and also use math calculation to make his point on page 32 he use college graduation and the sometimes poses you question and make you think “If you had chosen them randomly from the American population, the odds that half of your twelve closest friends would be college graduates would be six in a thousand”, he ask a question then give you the answer to it in the next tine “The odds that half of the twelve would have advanced degrees would be less than one in a million”. If faculties reflected the general population, 32 percent of professors would be registered Democrats and 31 percent would be registered Republicans. Forty percent would be evangelical Christians. This statistics on college and friend bring it close to Brooks’ audience. Brooks does not come out there and say “you do not live a divest life “ but he use this article to teacher himself and people around him” Many of us live in absurdly unlikely groupings, because we have organized our lives that way”, Brooks his not posting fingers at one group but making it
Many individuals interpret diversity differently specifically in the United States because of its melting pot of distinct cultures and lifestyles. In his essay “People Like Us”, David Brooks’ argues that although the United States is a diverse nation as a whole, it is homogeneous in specific aspects like interactions between people. To some extent, his observation is true; people tend to stick to what or who they are comfortable with. There are also exceptions where the American people attempt to establish relationships with others because of their desire to expand out of their norm. For instance, Brooks excludes the
In the essay, "People Like us" by the author, David Brooks, the main focus is the diversity in America. The United states has a label as being a country that is very diverse. Our country has many different types of ethnic groups, religions, personalities, interest, etc. so in that case, you really can justify the United states as diverse. Brooks mostly uses logic in his essay to prove that, once you look at the United States with a more magnified view, you might realize that technicalities come into play and change the previous statement to, unfortunately, the complete opposite, a corrupt society with no diversity.
Ever since birth Americans are told that they live in a free country with a diverse cultured society. But these myths are misleading. The myth of the Melting Pot and of Freedom in accord with the other myths mentioned in this book deceivingly make the United States appear to be more equal than it actually is. The Myth of the Melting Pot says that the United States is like a “melting pot” of cultures and ethnicities.
Brooks uses the diversity of neighborhoods in America to support his claim: America lacks diversity. He states that he has noticed people are “making strenuous efforts to group themselves with people who are basically like themselves” (Brooks 132). People who share common values and interests seem to attract, including in communities. Brooks points out that many neighborhoods have a general race, values, and interests. When making this argument Books neglects addressing the origin of segregated neighborhoods. When America was just developing its government and values, millions of people where coming into America from other countries and relocating themselves. They moved in by and reached out to others who shared their common values and cultural beliefs. They segregated themselves for support and structure during their new adventure, becoming an American. While understanding that it looks as though America is not diverse because of the efforts made by Americans to segregate themselves, we have to keep in
David Brook’s essay, “People Like Us, describes about the tolerance and diversity in the United States. Since the great immigration of the late 19th century, America has been cited as one of the most diverse countries in the world. The United States is home to individuals from many different races, ethnic backgrounds, religions, political views, interests, personalities, and income levels. However, according to Brook’s, instead of the population of the country uniting in its diversity and using it as a strength, individuals are trying to distance themselves from others who are not like themselves, rather, band themselves together with those who are like them. Brook’s notes that, even though most of Americans are doing the right thing by finding locations where they are most comfortable and where they believe they can succeed. Their decisions make them achieve their goals often lead towards their own ethnic or racial extractions. For instance, Brook’s himself confesses that he has in the past gravitated towards places where he believed he could be most comfortable in and where he also felt he could pursue his identity. He further states, that the majority of his friends are middle-income level Caucasians and conservative Christians. Brooks’ main argument in the essay is that many individuals in the United States often do not even bother to show that they would like to
The authors further explain their reasons for calling America a “racial democracy” and how conflicted they are. Jason Stanley and Weaver explain how minorities
Have you ever been in a situation where you have to choose one side or another, but agree and disagree with both sides? Everyday American citizens deal with this problem everyday of their lives. There are two sides, or parties, of America, Republicans and Democrats. These two parties hardly, if ever, agree with a particular issue. However, they always find ways to disagree, and explain why the other side is simple minded with a particular issue. In the Ted talk, “Can a divided America heal,” it explains ways how our divided America can heal, as well as ways why our divided America will not heal. I believe that American citizens are too stubborn to be able to come together, and heal America.
Malcolm Forbes once said, “Diversity: the art of thinking independently together.” The same diversity that shaped the United States going back to the sixteenth century when immigrants landed in North America. Diversity of people and species, but their real differences were religion, politics, economics, social issues, and the fantastic ways they dealt with those issues.
The United States is one of, if not the most, diverse nations in the world. It is often described as a
The United States has Changed from a Melting Pot to a Vast Culture with Varying Racial Backgrounds
Multiculturalism is also known as ethnic diversity relating to communities containing multiple cultures. The term is used in two different broad ways, descriptively and normatively. By using the descriptive term, we usually refer to the simple fact of cultural diversity. This can be applied to the demographic make-up of a specific place and sometimes at the organizational level such as schools, neighborhoods or nations. The normative term is often referred to ideologies or politics that promote this diversity or its institutionalization. The United States have been a magnet for people all over the globe, searching for a better life and bringing their own culture and traditions to a new vast country. No
The United States has a motto, e pluribus unum, that suggests that in America, embracing diversity creates unity. Long ago, during the 1900s, assimilation was considered to be crucial in order for a naturalization process to occur. Immigrants were forced to assimilate and adopt to the American culture, in which they had never been introduced to before. Over time, things evolved and changed to the point where people began to assimilate to a certain point, but still have their cultural traditions, giving America a nickname known as the Melting Pot. America being known as “The Melting Pot,” defends the claim that in today’s society, The United States of America is moving toward a new standard in which diversity and individuality are encouraged more than uniformity and conformity.
Even though these three people are from a different ethnicity they believe that an America and any person from a different ethnicity who lives in this country have the same rights and opportunities. Person one who is from Cambodia said, “In this country, I have the freedom to express myself”. Also, they stayed that their ethnicity does not affect their lives. They feel very good at what they are and their origin. Moreover, they said that this country is a multicultural society. There are people from different countries with different traditions, religions, and ideas around the U.S. The three interviewees have friends from different ethnicities. Person two said, “When I was living in the Los Angeles, I met people from Germany, el Salvador, and