In any company or organization, there will always be a time of turnover. Turnover can be high or low with many contributing factors. Onboarding programs are effective ways of hiring good and productive employees. "Onboarding programs help employees to integrate, assimilate, and transition to new jobs by making them familiar with corporate policies, procedures, culure, and politics by clarifying work-role expectations and responsibilities (Kinicki, A., & Fugate, M., 2016, pg. 65)." I could not agree more than personality testing is very important in the preemployment process. However with hiring you always running the risk of hiring good employees and bad employees. Turnover has pros and cons. Losing low-performing person is always a …show more content…
These factors include things such as effective communication and true commitments. In this assignment we will be discussing how job satisfaction and workplace attitude affects production. Currently, I work as an insurance agent. I can tell you from working as an insurance agent now and working as a phlebotomist for many years how attitude and job satisfaction affected these two careers. Job Satisfaction When a person comes to work each day, they are required to perform their job duties to the best of their ability. However, how a person performs these duties each day depends on how much they like or dislike their occupation. Job satisfaction affects job performance and turnover rates. “Job satisfaction essentially reflects the extent to which an individual likes his or her job. Formally defined, job satisfaction is an effective or emotional response toward various facets on one’s job (Kinicki & Fugate, 2016, pg. 57).” It is possible a person only likes part of his or her job though. Job satisfaction has five predominant models. These models are: was need fulfillment met, are expectations met, values, equity (fairness), and dispositional/ genetic components. Job satisfaction also affects attitudes and …show more content…
James 4: 10 (NKJV) “ Humble yourself in the sight of the Lord, and He will lift you up.” The ability to be humble is a strength that everyone do not have. To some individuals, always being humble is weak. However as stated in out video presentation, “Every strength is weakness on the other side of the coin (Kinicki & Fugate, 2017).” References Presentation: Lesson 2 – Individual Behavior in the Organization. (n.d.). Retrieved March 29, 2017, fromhttps://learn.liberty.edu/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_339117_1&content_id=_16408684_1 Kinicki, A., & Fugate, M. (2016). Organizational behavior: A practical, problem-solving approach plus Connect. McGraw-Hill NKJV Bible Landis, E. A., Vick, C. L., & Novo, B. N. (2015). Employee attitudes and job satisfaction. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 12(5), 37-42. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/1764139256?accountid=12085 Reply Quote Mark as
Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2013). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Retrieved from
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Organizational behavior (16th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Note: Refer to Chapter 3)
Please answer all questions in this exam. Answers to the multiple choice questions need to be filled in on the scantron sheets (remember to use pencil to fill in the circles) and also circled on the exam itself. Answers to the short answer questions should go in the exam booklet provided. All three components (scantron sheets, exam booklets, paper copy of exam) should be turned in at the conclusion of the exam.
John Molson School of Business Department of Management Comm 222: Organizational Behaviour and Theory Winter 2013 General Information Comm 222 Section E Class times: Monday & Wednesday 8:45 – 10:00 Class location: MB 3.430 Credits: 3 Instructor:
Buchanan, A. H. (2001). Organizational Behaviour:An Introductory Text (4 ed.). (F. T. Hall, Ed.) Pearson Education.
Colquitt, J. et al (2011). Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace (2 ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational Behavior (14th Edition). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
Colquitt, J., Lepine, J., & Wesson, M. (2013). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workpla
(Source: Wood, J. Zeffane, R. Fromholtz, M. Wiesner, Morrison, R. & Seet, P 2013, Organisational Behaviour: Core Concepts and Applications, 3rd Australasian Edition Wiley, Brisbane; pp. 75)
Job satisfaction is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences. It has been treated both as a general attitude and satisfaction with five specific dimensions of the job: pay, the work itself, promotion opportunities, supervision, and coworkers. Challenging work, valued rewards, opportunities for advancement, competent supervision, and supportive coworkers are dimensions of the job that can lead to satisfaction (Nelson & Quick, 2013, pg.
References:Huczynski, A. A. and Buchanan, D. A. (2007) Organizational behaviour: An introductory text. 6th ed., Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Job satisfaction is the very important factor in general quality of life because it is closely connected with working life (e.g. Argyle, 1989; Bang & Lee, 2006), with family life, everyday life, and mental health (Orpen, 1978; Schmitt and Bedeian, 1982; Faragher, Cass & Cooper, 2005). Level of job satisfaction is also highly related to turnover, absenteeism rate, work productivity or accomplishment (Muchinsky, 1977; Organ, 1977). Many researchers (e.g. Cherrington, 1994; Acorn, Ratner & Crawford, 1997; Ostroff, 1992; Spector, 1997) state that employees who experience high job satisfaction contribute to organisational commitment, job involvement, their physical, mental health and overall well-being are improved. Job dissatisfaction on the
Over the course of this semester, Organizational Behavior has highlighted numerous topics, which concentrated on
The Value Percept Theory argues that job satisfaction depends on whether a job supplies the things an individual value most. Overall satisfactions derive form combined levels of satisfaction from various elements of an individual’s job, whether it’s: pay, promotion, supervision, coworkers, or the work itself. Job satisfaction is based on cognitive and affective components, which is evaluated by what an individual thinks about the job, and how they feel. Cognition evaluation is based on experiences, weighing different aspects of a job; as affect is a reaction of the job, which can fluctuate based on moods and emotions. Level of dissatisfaction is measured by the difference between what one has and what one wants, and the level of importance of that facet to the individual. Statistics have proven, that supplying individuals with what they value, will increase the chance of better performance, which has a high correlation with an individual’s affective commitment with the organization.
Organizational behavior is the behavior of individuals, either one or a group. It is not the behavior of an organization, but rather the behavior of the people in an organization. This can be anywhere from a family at home to a church to a work group within a company. Some of the challenges that make behaviors challenging in today’s workplace are high performance, ethical behavior, productivity improvement, technology utilization, quality, diversity, work-life balance, and the global economy, (Schermerhorn, 2003, P. 1).