Written and originally performed in a period of Athenian ascendency, Sophocles’ Oedipus the King presents a subversive view of human nature. Through Oedipus and Jocasta, Sophocles dangerously pushes the boundaries of our beliefs, insisting that not only may the knowledge we think we possess be largely based on an illusion, but also that we may lack power over the world around us and through extension, our own identities. Yet while Sophocles may deny us the freedom and control we desire, he does offer us something much more real, namely, the inhospitable truth of the limitations of our human existence. And while we may throw our lives up against this reality in a futile attempt to maintain our sense of control and security, ultimately the domain …show more content…
However, Sophocles goes astray as the pain and suffering continually accrue to an unbearable and unimaginable point demonstrating our vulnerability all too clearly. When Oedipus and Jocasta face “the blackest things / a man can do” (1543-44), Jocasta commits suicide and, as Sophocles describes with revolting imagery and vivid diction, Oedipus “rips off her brooches, the long gold pins […] looking straight up into the points” and “digs them down the sockets of his eyes, crying […] his voice like a dirge, rising, over and over / raising the pins, raking them down his eyes. / And at each stroke blood spurts from the roots, / splashing his beard, a swirl of it, nerves and clots--/ black gail of blood pulsing, gushing down” constructing a sense of empathy, causing us to cringe in visceral repulsion and vicariously endure the unbearable pain and violation Oedipus voluntarily subjects himself to, perhaps the only thing he can do in response to the truth he relentlessly pursued (1404, 1406–8, 1412-17). But as the impossible becomes a reality, our tendencies towards faith in our own “full knowledge” and avoidance of truth and humility that Sophocles aims to debase are merely reinforced and affirmed (286). We flinch in fear at the extreme consequences Oedipus cannot but subject himself to and we consequently …show more content…
The immediate reversal from “deep joy” to “wailing, madness and doom, death, disgrace / all the griefs in the world that you can name” highlights the unyielding power the truth holds over Oedipus, a truth we consequently experience a repulsion from (1420–22). However, the only world where the truth could possibly hold such power and result in such suffering is one where the truth did not exist in the first place. The disastrous influence of the truth on Oedipus’s and Jocasta’s lives forces a radical “[readjustment] of our position” beyond just the world of the stage as we realize not that our understanding of the world may not encompass the entire truth, but rather, as indicated by the extent of the consequences of the truth, that we have perhaps built our entire lives and beliefs on a lie about who we actually are (Brook 75). In this manner, Sophocles emphasizes our vulnerability that at the very least demands a reevaluation of ourselves as we must humbly recognize that we have been wrong. Moreover, when we must choose to follow the path of either Oedipus or Jocasta, choose to pursue the truth like Oedipus or comfortably rest in a denial of it, Sophocles further pushes us into a position of humility through a demonstration of our limitations. As the opposing
Oedipus is blind, not only in "mind," but also in "ears." He has proven himself to be a man who can listen carefully, but when he becomes angry he cannot hear anyone’s views but his own. His ability to reason, his second great virtue, falls victim to his
Throughout the tragedy by Sophocles, the king Oedipus relies on his personal glory to attain long lasting fame and balks when confronted with anything that might shatter this perception that he is the best. While both characters have done marvelous deeds in the past, their inherent arrogance, which is part of the tragic flaw of each of the characters,
In the tragic story “Oedipus the King”, Sophocles emphasizes on the idea of sight and blindness. Sight or blindness can have more than just physical characteristics; a person can have mental insight or can ensue blindness in a situation. The blindness issue remains an effective contrasting method for Oedipus at many points in the drama. It breaks down into two components: Oedipus 's ability to physically see and his willingness to see the truth in what has transpired. Even people who have 20/20 vision, can still remain blind to the truth, facts, and the complete understanding of any situation. Within his writings, Sophocles ' frequently address the ideas of sight and blindness, using them as metaphors for insight and knowledge. This will be the focal point of this essay.
In his tragedy Oedipus Rex, Sophocles utilizes irony to show that sometimes the true fatal flaw lies not within how closely a character conforms to society’s definition of idealness, but instead, it lies intrinsically within society’s very definition of idealness itself. When Oedipus questions the shepherd who first found Oedipus, and the shepherd initially refuses to answer, Oedipus threatens, “So, you won’t talk willingly—then you’ll talk with pain” (228: 1266-1267). Here, Oedipus demonstrates his quality of quick decision-making, which, despite coming across to the modern audience as rash and headstrong, contemporary Athenians strongly valued. This action, selfless from Oedipus, ironically leads to his demise. At the fateful crossroads
The characters in the play Oedipus The King, by Sophocles, respond to suffering in a variety of ways. Characters like Tiresias respond altruistically to protect others from the truth, other characters similar to Oedipus tend to approach these situations with gall and are hasty with allegations, and the remaining characters respond like Jocasta with disbelief and extremity. Ironically, although suffering is painful and destructive, the way the characters dealt with suffering brought each of them to find the true value of clarity and healing that can be found when suffering.
Throughout Sophocles’ exhilarating play, “Oedipus Rex”, the reader is presented with various themes that contribute to this extraordinary play. Some of the themes explored throughout the story include: “Mercy versus Justice”, “Loyalty versus Truth”, and “Sight versus Blindness.” However, “Fate versus Free Will” is the theme that is frequently presented throughout the play and it contributes to the revelation of Oedipus’ tragic destiny. As “Oedipus the King” begins, the scene is revealed to be located at the palace in Thebes where several people express their concern of the plague that has affected Thebes in major ways. Oedipus concerned for the lives of his “children” sends his brother-in-law, Creon, to discover the reason behind the occurrences.
The famed tragedian Sophocles is known for his unique ideas and intellect. Sophocles carefully utilizes of all of his intelligence and creative ability in order to make use of illuminating moments throughout the play which allow his audience to draw conclusions about free will, fate, knowledge, and power throughout perhaps his most iconic play, Oedipus Rex. the main character Oedipus experiences an illuminating moment when he gouges his eyes out at the discovery of the truth about his actions. This illumination is expressed in order to express Sophocles’ idea that fate overpowers free will.
A recurring theme in literature is justice and injustice. It seems that in most things that we as a society watch, read, and act upon are the justices and injustices in our world, both in real life and in fiction. What that shows is that the struggle between justice and it’s antithesis is entwined in everyday life. But, that struggle is not just of this epoch, it’s also evident in times of others, such as in Oedipus Rex by the ancient Greek tragedian Sophocles. In this work King Oedipus of Thebes must use his knowledge and understanding of justice to right a curse that has been placed on his kingdom.
From an early age children are told ‘Never ask questions you do not want the answers to.” In Oedipus the King by Sophocles, Oedipus’s ignorance and pride leads him to ignore other’s warnings and follow his own desires. Oedipus wanted to know who he was despite admonition, and exposed the truth that would lead to his own undoing. Sophocles conveys a unique universal message using verbal, situational, and dramatic irony that warns readers the search for truth is unfavorable.
The play Oedipus the King by Sophocles explores themes of prophecy and knowledge. In this paper, I shall discuss the interactions between Teiresias and Oedipus in Oedipus the King, and I will elaborate on how Teiresias is more knowledgeable than Oedipus, but does not posses any greater wisdom or practical knowledge. I shall argue that Sophocles does not see Teiresias as superior to Oedipus, in fact they are both in the wrong when it comes to morality and the truth. Throughout the play, Sophocles emphasizes that the acquisition of knowledge is futile in circumventing fate and prophecy, thus he presents a nihilistic argument in matters of agency and choice.
The production of great tragedy in ancient Greece was a pursuit attempted by many but accomplished only by some. Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex is considered today as one of the greatest tragedies produced by an author during this time. Carefully crafted motifs, character-developing monologues, and poignant irony all combine to create a tragedy that leaves readers stunned and grieving for poor Oedipus. Throughout Oedipus Rex, the motif of blindness and sight emphasizes the struggle between the power of free will and the power of the gods made evident in Oedipus’ interactions with Tiresias, Jokasta’s attempts to assuage Oedipus’ fear of his crime, and the development of Oedipus’ own character from a man who held little faith in prophecy to one who
The tragic hero’s epiphany manifests once he discovers his wife and mother’s body, which finally forces him to not only accept the truths he’s previously avoided for the entirety of the text but also realize his whole life he acted as his own worst enemy. Oedipus’ crimes evoke horror and disgust from the audience, allowing them to feel a moral superiority to this fictional character and take comfort in the fact their transgressions seem minute comparatively. Once the pain of knowledge becomes too intense for the character to bear, he results to gouging out “his own eyeballs” in a desperate attempt of a momentary distraction with physical pain; hence Oedipus’ understanding catalyzes the scene of suffering (Sophocles 1458). While the average viewer will probably never commit the crimes of Oedipus, this self punishment and gore serves as a cautionary tale that even minuscule infidelities hurt others but the remaining guilt becomes a burden on the transgressor as well. Through vicariously committing the most heinous crimes imaginable and concluding their
It is said that the truth will set you free, but in the case of Sophocles’ Oedipus, the truth drives a man to imprison himself in a world of darkness by gouging out his eyes. As he scours the city for truth, Oedipus’ ruin is ironically mentioned and foreshadowed in the narrative. With these and other devices Sophocles illuminates the king’s tragic realization and creates a firm emotional bond with the audience.
Tragedy can either be the darkest part of life for one person or it can be a learning opportunity for the other person. Of all the tragedies written in the literate, “Oedipus the King” written by ‘Sophocles’ is one of the oldest and the most prominent tragedy written till date. It is the story of the king, who is brutally left to die by his own parents, luckily survived, unknowingly killed his own father and married his mother. Although this story was written 2000 years ago, but it still has a great significance in the modern world. Of the most powerful tragedies of the time, “Oedipus the king” discloses such values and situations as parental aggression, child abandonment, self-confidence, ability to handle trauma, and parent-child intimate relationship that people are struggling with in today’s world. Sophocles reveals these behaviours and incidents through the actions of Oedipus.
exercising his free choice by making bad decisions . Oedipus certainly meets these portrayals of a tragic hero. The dialect of tragedy consists of two circles: one is a relative point and the other is impacted and the effect on its audience. Sophocles and Aristotle’s achieve that task with absolute clearness. The modern reader, coming to the classic drama not entirely to the enjoyment, will not always surrender himself to the emotional effect. He is apt to worry about Greek ‘fatalism’ and the justice of the downfall of Oedipus, and, finding no satisfactory solution for these intellectual difficulties, loses half the pleasure that the drama was intended to produce . In dramatizing stories, there will dependably blends of passionate sentiments, suspense, and fervor to discover what’s