Crimes are committed by individuals for various reasons. There is no definite answer as to why crime is committed, but several theories help explain them. Biological theories of crime explain criminality “as a result of an inherited trait in an individual” (Mallicoat 80). This theory focuses on the genetic makeup that leads to criminal behavior. Similarly, psychological theories of crime “explain criminal behavior by individual factors, such as deficiencies in early childhood socialization or experiences, that lead to gaps in cognitive development” (Mallicoat 81). Psychological theories focus on the individual as well, but specifically on the mind. However, sociological theories of crime “look at how larger social structures, such as environments and institutions can help explain criminal behavior” Mallicoat (84). Sociological theories focus on factors outside of the individual. Contemporary theories of crime focus on the crucial role adolescence has …show more content…
Social disorganization theory “is a reflection of how crime is related to socioeconomic status, particularly for lower class-communities” (Mallicoat 85). High crime rates are commonly attributed to high poverty rates and this theory reflects that idea. Based on the text, “Alas, the downturn of the economy meant that people were soon left with an area where there was little social structure to help promote a positive community” (Mallicoat 86). The loss of industrial jobs had an irrecuperable impact on the community and Flint’s crime rate reflects that. According to the author, “Since 2007, Flint’s violent-crime rate has been among the top five among cities of 100,000 or more, and the city has been ranked number one since 2011” (Mallicoat 86). The loss of jobs and deterioration of the city has spiked the violent crime rate. This pattern is not distinct to Flint, and many cities have experienced the same
There are several theories that are used to explain why people commit crimes. These theories cover a range of scientific studies that still continue to be used in crime studies today. By using these theories and information gathered, an explanation of the criminal behaviours will be examined and explained relating to each supporting theories. The traditional explanations for crime are nature vs. nurture debate and the ideas relating to any possible biological reasons that turns someone into a criminal. Are some people really just ‘born bad?’ or are there other, social reasons for criminal behaviour? In this essay I will look at both sides of the argument, and offer an insight into the reasons behind such criminal behaviours. The Classical
First, psychological theory suggests that a person’s environment and past can influence their ability and desire to commit crime while biological theory suggest a person’s DNA makeup could influence their ability to commit crime. “Biological theories within the field of criminology attempt to explain behaviors contrary to societal expectations through examination of
This can be applied to the behaviors of criminals. According to Fishbein (1990, pg.37), “behavior [is] primarily attributed to inherited predispositions and genetic influences.” Nurture is the environmental influence that shape human behavior (Fishbein, 1990, pg.37). Human genetics and environmental factors contribute to the uniqueness to a person’s behavior. However, there are underlying qualities in a criminal’s historical background. Aspects of the nature and nurturing of a criminal behavior includes some problems with earlier biological explanations and some recent biological explanations which have overcome the weaknesses of
There are many theories for why criminals are criminals. These theories have been developed, changed, and even thrown out over the years. Each one has been contradicted and reaffirmed, until eventually there is a consensus for both biological and sociological reasons which would explain why a person would act criminally or participate in a criminal act/behavior. I argue that the most relevant theories to answering why a person would do these things are social disorganization and neurological factors, specifically testosterone levels in males.
For several years, theorists have come to the conclusion that people commit crimes for several different reasons. Some say that criminals are born; some say that it is because of self gratification and the need to be rewarded. Theorists believe that there is a psychological, biological, and sociobiological theory that will explain the genuine
What is crime? Crime is an unlawful act which usually results in punishment. This paper will include information that goes in depth about crime and a couple theories of crime, which include the biological and sociological theories. Both are very reasonable theories on why criminals commit crimes. What will be introduced first is the basic concept of what crime is.
This breakdown of organization and culture within a community leads to a lack of informal social control which in turn leads to higher crime rates especially in the juvenile population (Simons, Simons, Burt, Brody, & Cutrona, 2005). Social disorganization theory asserts that strong levels of connection within a community along with a sense of civic pride motivate individuals to take a more active role in the community therefore acting as a deterrent to crime.
Crime occurs in society for a number of reasons. The reasoning behind the commission of an offense may not always be crystal clear. In certain cases theories as to the “Why” of a crime have been developed and numerous studies conducted to substantiate that particular idea. Theories like social learning and sociocultural behaviors focus largely on a learner being taught the manner in which they ought to behave. If a young child is shaped to be a certain person later in life, they will likely follow what they know to be right.
Women may commit more crimes than is proved as they may not have been caught and the crimes may not have been recorded. Biological, psychological and sociological can be explanations for crime. Gender predicts crime. Males are seen to be offenders.
This paper summarizes four theories of criminology. Rational choice theory states that criminals act based on a thought process that weighs the pros and cons of criminality. Criminologists who believe in this theory feel that most criminals are people capable of having rational thoughts before committing a crime. Trait theory is the view of criminology that suggests criminality is a product of abnormal biological or psychological traits. Criminologists who believe in this theory feel that criminals choose to commit crime because of a brain anomaly or chemical imbalance. Social structure theory is “a view that disadvantaged economic class position is a primary cause of crime” (Seigel 139). Those who follow this theory often believe social forces can have a great effect on whether or not a person commits a crime. An example would be those who are poor are more being more prone to commit crime. Social process theory is a view that criminality depends on how a person interacts with different organizations and institutions and processes in society. For example, a family would be considered
There are many perspectives in which one can analyze and understand why a person decides to commit a crime. Some perspectives are social learning theory, strain theory, classical and rational choice theory, deterrence theory, biological and psychological positivist theories, among others. However, for the purposes of this paper, the biological and psychological theories will be discussed.
What makes a criminal a criminal? Can anyone become a criminal? Answering and understanding these questions is the core work of criminologists as most criminologists attempt to make sense of why people do certain things (Garland, Sparks 2000). This essay will consider the notion that any person could become a criminal and in so doing consider the initial question. This essay will outline a range of theories that attempt to describe human behavior in relation to criminal behavior given the complexities of behaviour. Several theories will be considered as no single theory of behavior can account fully for the complexities and range in criminal behaviour. The theories range from social-control, to classical, to biological, to personality
For the most part, biological theories of crime and deviance have had an unsuccessful and undistinguished career among sociologists. The Italian physician Cesare Lombroso suggested that someone who is born criminal possesses atavism or primitive evolutionary characteristics that produced violent, savage, and apelike tendencies in humans (Goode, p. 27). In addition, biological theories of deviance see crime and deviant behavior as a form of illness due to pathological factors to certain individuals. The biological theory is another example of Charles Whitman actions. Smart, strong, and talented, Charles Whitman seemed like a perfect all-American boy stereotype.
The causes of crime seem to be indefinite and ever changing. In the 19th century, slum poverty was blamed; in the 20th century, a childhood without love was blamed (Adams 152). In the era going into the new millennium, most experts and theorists have given up all hope in trying to pinpoint one single aspect that causes crime. Many experts believe some people are natural born criminals who are born with criminal mindsets, and this is unchangeable. However, criminals are not a product of heredity. They are a product of their environment and how they react to it. This may seem like a bogus assumption, but is undoubtedly true.
Figuring out why people commit crimes is one of the central concerns of criminology. Do most criminals act rationally after weighing the costs of crime? Is society ever to blame for an individual to commit a crime? Do mental diseases or even genetics factor into whether a person will live a life of crime. Over the years, many people have developed theories to try to answer these questions. In fact, the number of theories of why people commit crimes sometimes seems to equal the number of criminologists. I explore these questions and much more in the paper that follow.