COMMON SENSE 1776
1. The essay seems to persuade the colonies to seek independence. Paine strongly infers that he wants this independence to come about peacefully, but he says that it’s inevitable.
2.
a. This was written in 1776. The Revolutionary War started in April of 1775. When people are shooting at each other in fields, the time for talking it over is presumably long gone. (Given it could’ve been written prior to publishing, but wars take planning.)
b. He blames the English. Just like everyone else in the United Kingdom, nowadays.
c. He’s referring to the New World, what became North America, but more specifically what became the United States.
3. What he says: “This is a very important matter. Every city, country, province, and kingdom,
…show more content…
I’d think the side that had soldiers patrolling towns, inviting themselves into people’s homes whenever they wanted to, might’ve been the forceful one. But I’d be wrong.
5. a. “As much hath been said of the advantages of reconciliation, which, like an agreeable dream, hath passed away.” b. The Colonists’ side of the argument. The damage done to the colonies. The benefits of independence. The morality of Britain’s rule.
6.
a. That America will not be happy without Britain’s assistance. b. “We may as well assert that because a child has thrived upon milk, that it is never to have meat, or that the first twenty years of our lives is to become a precedent for the next twenty.”
7. He argues against the fact that Britain cares for the colonies, as anything other than another subjugated land.
8.
a. Britain’s involvement in the colonies’ affairs was because the colonies didn’t have any of their own affairs. Any adversity that came was against the English, and it was dealt with by the English. b. Peace with France and Spain would come.
9.
a. The argument that Britain gave birth to the colonies and they should not break from it. b. Paine claims that it’s because of
2. Analyze the ways in which British imperial policies between 1763 and 1776 intensified colonial resistance to British rule and their commitment to republican values.
3. Were all the American grievances really justified, or were the British actually being more reasonable than most Americans have traditionally believed?
The colonists argument is that the king was paying them too much for taxes. The king was paying the people in the country less
a. The British people are referred to as “our British brethren.” They and the colonists share a “common kindred”. But they, like King George, “have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity.” Thus, the British people must be held, like the rest of the world is help, as “enemies in war, in peace, friends.” The king and Parliament bear the brunt of the colonist “wrath.” It is the king who is charged with all their grievances. His history is one “of repeated injuries and usurpations.”
This next argument is on the colonist Economic well being. The first subject on economic well being is the Quartering act the Quartering act was good for economic well being because this gave the british troops shelter, supplies, and food which saved money. The next subject in the Tea act. The tea act was when they lowered the price on tea by letting east india company ship directly to the colonist pior.
I think that the american colonies were justified in fighting for their independence from the british. The reason I think that they are justified Is because the british took advantage of the colonists and forced them to follow their kings orders. In this essay I will explain why the colonies were justified on fighting the war against the british and declaring their independence from them. One reason why they are justified In declaring their independence Is that they were being taxed and punished by the british for trying to speak out against the british king. The boston tea party and other colonists rebellions punished everyone including the innocents of the colonies.
For a better part of the eighteenth century, the American colonists expressed vexation and disapproval of the "coercive " acts, which the British Government perpetrated on the colony through series of legislative acts by the British Parliament. Prior to the acts that the colonists in America termed as atrocious and oppressive, they were willing to cooperate and reaffirm loyalty to the King of England. Some of the legislations and declarations that colonists participated in was the sustenance of British soldiers in the colony, payment of import tariffs and other forms of taxes to support the British central government. These are but a few, the reasons as to why colonists objected to the mode of British rule in America. Another concern was the "Rights violations" by the English government regarding economic progress and representation. Because of these grievances, British colonists in America stepped up agitation through violation of the "tyrannical" Acts and petitions through the Continental Congress. The essay explores the grievances that Colonists in America held against the British government, in riposte to "My Dear America Cousin" letter.
Paine argues for the independence of the American colonies by providing multiple reasons for why he thinks they should leave Great Britain. Most of the reasons center around war, especially the fact that anybody Great Britain goes to war with, will also be at war with the American colonies. The American colonies cannot ally with any other countries because of their ties with England, and therefore will be missing out on opportunities and might get involved in something they don’t want to be part of due to them being part of England. The many kingdoms in Great Britain also increase chances of going to war, which would not be good for the colonies at all. Paine also argues that America is too far away to be part of England still, making it hard for them to communicate, and also for Great
The first reason that caused Britain and the colonies to fall apart was the Proclamation of 1763. Britain did not want to anger the Natives in area. In the text it said, “Britain wanted to avoid further wars with Native Americans on the frontier.” Britain did not want another war because they were still in debt from the French and Indian war. Britain then created the Proclamation of 1763, banning the movement west of the Appalachian Mountains. On page 145-46 in the textbook it says, “...British
Colonists sought independence from British government for a multitude of reasons. Tension quickly rose between England and the thirteen colonies due to the unjust taxing without fair representation in Parliament, the colonist’s rights to assemble were taken away by the British, and there were many unreasonable Acts and laws put into place in attempt to have complete control over the colonists as well as intimidate them. For these reasons and the suffering that the colonists endured at the hands of the British government, I feel that the colonists had plenty just causes to separate themselves from England.
While the colonists had many grievances surrounding King George III the strongest grievance was his plan “To force colonist to buy English products” he had Parliament place high taxes on goods from other countries. The key word
Some of the people from the colonies believed that they had a loyalty to England and some believed that they have a duty to this new sense of being an “american.”
In conclusion, the Colonists were very justified in waging war as they were being over taxed, being ruled from across the sea, and weren’t being taken seriously. The main reason was that the King was no longer for his people and was for the money instead. They were rightly justified because a leader of a country should always be for his people. These reasons helped the Colonists because it gave them a reason to keep going when things got tough. They could see the future of this country and they continued to fight until they could live their vision and
The first reason that the colonists were justified in breaking away from the British was because the British Parliament and soldiers made unjust decisions for their own personal gain and abused their powers over the colonists. As stated in Document 2 of the packet “Document-Based Questions--Path to Revolution”, the British parliament taxed the colonists for the sole purpose of levying money upon them (Stamp Act). The taxes was also mainly used to pay for the French-Indian War, which seems like it justifies the British taxing, except for the fact that it was taxes without representation, which can be labeled as tyranny. This supports my argument, as the American colonists didn’t like having to pay for the war, and let Britain take money away from them for profit. Another piece of evidence that supports my claim would be that on Document 10 of the packet it was stated that, “We have understood it be
This particular section also plays an especially vital role in declaring the independence from Great Britain as it clearly lays out all of the usurpations the King has committed. When analyzing this segment in particular, it should be noted that this section has a strategic organization in itself as the list of usurpations increases with severity as the list goes on. Expanding upon the organization of this portion of the document, there seems to be a segmentation of the listed abuses. The first section addresses the diminishment of a representative government, and explains how the tyranny of the King has replaced such a system. The following group of accusations include the restrictions the monarch has placed on the colonies’ ability to self-govern. Finally, the last few grievances depict the barbaric nature of the King’s rule, and explain that he has waged war upon the colonies. An abuse that addresses such cruelty is given in the following quote: “HE has constrained our fellow Citizens taken to Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the Executioners of their Friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.” Succeeding the long list of the King’s exploitations are the last two paragraphs of the document, which make up the